Fact not Fiction by Mohammed A. Hegazi

A FOUR-MINUTE VIDEO ON CHRISTIAN ZIONISM

2012-01-21T08:20:00.003+11:00

By: Tom Compton

Yes, it’s true, there have been at least 29 views of our newest YouTube video, “John Hagee with Benny Hinn: Praying for War In The Name of Jesus” in the Palestinian Territory and in 121 other countries around the world. In just over a week, there have been over 18,000 views of the video. This video highlights the mission of We Hold These Truths and shows the un-Christ-like danger Christian Zionism poses to the people ofPalestine, whether they are Christian, Muslim, or Jewish. For in fact, Christian Zionism beliefs are helping the Israelis to commit national suicide as evidenced by their occupation of Palestine and the repression of Palestinians for over 60 years and the "insane policies" of the Israeli government (see the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz: “Insanity,not logic, guides Israel’s leadership”).

The “likes” (110) and “dislikes” (40), YouTube ratings for the video are encouraging, along with the over 170 posted comments in the first week. We have ruffled some feathers, and, are also reaching people who have not thought about the issue in the past. Discouraging is the statistic that only 5.7% of the viewers in the US are under the age of 35, typically the top age group fighting these endless wars. In our experience from conducting over 70 vigils around the country, it is the under thirty people we talk to, who are more receptive to new ideas that might challenge their current beliefs, and are more receptive to pro-peace arguments than their parents. It is no secret that the majority of evangelical Christians in the US have supported the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. And, as John Hagee has publicly stated, these wars were needed to protect Israel (he says so in his prayer in our video).

In New Zealand, 37% of the YouTube viewers were under the age 35. Perhaps, they haven’t been weaned on serial wars like the youth here in the US. We need to do a better job of reaching youths on the Web. Why don't you help by passing on the link to “John Hagee with Benny Hinn: Praying for War In The Name of Jesus” or posting it to your FaceBook orTwitter accounts or email list. This video carries a ton of impact in only four minutes.

Tom Compton

WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS & PROJECT STRAIT GATE

P.O. BOX 35

WHEAT RIDGE, CO 80034

whtt.org

In the News -US Readies for Committing Suicide in Iran

2012-01-13T15:44:00.002+11:00

http://rt.com/politics/us-georgia-iran-war-441/

The United States is sponsoring the construction of facilities in Georgia on the threshold of a military conflict in Iran, a member of Georgian opposition movement Public Assembly, Elizbar Javelidze has stated.

According to the academician, that explains why President Mikhail Saakashvili is roaming the republic opening new hospitals in its regions.

“These are 20-bed hospitals…It’s an American project. A big war between the US and Iran is beginning in the Persian Gulf. $5 billion was allocated for the construction of these 20-bed military hospitals,” Javelidze said in an interview with Georgian paper Kviris Kronika (News of the Week), as cited by Newsgeorgia website.

The opposition member stated that the construction is mainly paid from the American pocket.

In addition, airports are being briskly built in Georgia and there are talks of constructing a port for underwater vessels in Kulevi on the eastern Black Sea coast in Georgia.

Javelidze believes that it is all linked to the deployment of US military bases on the Georgian soil. Lazika – one of Saakashvili’s mega-projects, a new city that will be built from a scratch – will be “an American military town”. According to the politician, “a secret airdrome” has already been erected in the town of Marneuli, southern Georgia.

The opposition member wondered who would protect Georgia in case if Iran fires its missiles against US military facilities on the territory of the Caucasian state.

All in all, about 30 new hospitals and medical centers were opened in the former Soviet republic in December last year. The plan is to build over a hundred more.

As for Lazika, the Georgian president announced his ambitious idea to build a second-largest city in Georgia, its western economic and trade center, at the end of 2011. According to the plan – which was slammed by his opponents and many analysts – Saakashvili’s dream-town will become home to at least half a million people within a decade.

HOMOSEXUALITY AND JEWS

2012-01-09T00:36:00.003+11:00

The gay plague

Insight into destructive forces

determining the way we think

By John Kaminski

Homosexuals are not normal human beings in the same way that Jews are not normal citizens of any country in which they reside.

Public acceptance of homosexuality has been used by the Jewish puppetmasters to destabilize societies they are plundering.

All societies coalesce on the basis of protection of one's own children and property. Homosexuals and Jews sabotage this life-sustaining coalescence as they are motivated by their own pathological and physiologically deviant propensities.

The original, official acceptance of homosexuality in contemporary society occurred in 1973 after three-year long jihad of outrageous public insults to American psychiatrists by an ad hoc army of gay activists.

To get the aggressive homosexuals to stop harassing them, the American Psychiatric Association canvassed its 10,000 members and by a vote declared that the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-II (DSM-II) would no longer classify homosexuality as a pathology. Instead, it would be called an alternative lifestyle.

No medical evidence whatsoever figured in this decision.

Coming on the heels of ten turbulent years of the totally Jewish Women's Liberation Movement, which exacerbated the deterioration of the American nuclear family, this gay pronouncement further loosened what religious types might call the bounds of decency, and boldly pushed homosexuality into the public limelight as something that deserved our tolerance and compassion.

On an interpersonal level, this attitude is desirable, because love and understanding are the most important things in life.

But what are we trying to understand? A physiological and psychological perversion. It is not an alternative lifestyle, it is the physiological consequence of testosterone deficiency during early pregnancy that produces effeminate males.<http://news.softpedia.com/news/Low-In-Utero-Testosterone-Levels-Determine-Homosexual-Behavior-in-Males-52005.shtml>

The real question is why those effeminate males produce such a flamboyantly depraved culture, and the simple answer is that is because homosexuality is depraved, unnatural and irresponsible to the highest degree.

It is probably the most potent weapon in the arsenal of the Jewish destabilization template, which has now destroyed most of the countries it has touched (and that's all of them).

On a sociological level, the attempt to pretend homosexuals are normal has resulted in just what homosexual behavior always produces:

• Unwanted sexual attacks on children and adults.

• Accelerated deterioration of the nuclear family.

• Skewing of discussions about anything because of having to recognize the gay perspective (which is strikingly like the Jewish perspective), and . . .

• Utter unreliability and untrustworthiness in any institution, organization, or business that employs gays, whose behavior, either in concealment or extravagant flaunting of their chosen attitude, always destabilizes any relationship with any member of the heterosexual majority.

The answer you get when you protest these things is always "we must tolerate others who are different."

The response to that should always be "I have no wish to recognize an obvious illness, a sickening deviation from normal behavior, as normal, because (1) it disgusts me, and (2) it is extraordinarily unhealthy and destructive behavior."

Thus does a small percentage of psychological and physiological aberrants force the vast majority of ordinary heterosexuals to tolerate something that disgusts them, verifying Nietzsche's observation that the Jewish philosophy promotes disease and depravity as virtues, something we observe in today's slanted media almost every day.

How this whole pro-gay agenda has metastasized into the sewer of destructive social engineering now dominating mainstream society — with transgender sex advocates prominent on our Supreme Court and closet homosexuals selected as U.S. presidents, senators, judges and generals so they can be more effectively controlled by their beastmasters at suburban East Coast synagogues — is the focus of our story tonight.

You must know by now that for a decade or more, poison Jewish rules from the American Federation of Teachers have brought condoms into elementary schools and homosexual advocates talking to first graders about how great queer folk really are.

The heterosexuals of America have cringed in horror at this blatant disregard and destruction of most people's moral values, as well as the minds of children who are forced to receive these perverted messages.

Since people's first sexual experience almost always becomes a sexual preference throughout life, millions of healthy lives have been ruined by inserting this information into the mind of child too young to grasp its implications, or molesting him or her at any age.

The conflict and chaos, both inner and outer, that results from this profound psychological intrusion illustrates a classic example of Frederic Bastiat's concept of having to choose between morality and the law.

Parents have lost their right to teach their children about life, because our anti-human government has declared we must be nice to homosexuals, and accept their warped behavior no matter how much it makes us want to hurl. Or no matter how many children it hurts.

The American people have pretty much gone along with this twisted policy, and reaped the noxious consequences of it, principally the destruction of the American family, which had already suffered greatly as a result of the Women's Liberation Movement.

Because we kept silent, these attacks on our natural rights as human beings have increased in both number and profundity. The protestations of religious types were drowned out by a combination of preachers getting busted with hookers of both genders, or Jewish-generated liberal Protestant denominations ordaining gay priests into their roles as societal saboteurs.

What got the big headlines was the Catholic priests with their hands down boys' pants, although the Jews milked that for all it was worth (almost as much as the Holocaust reparations scams, but that's another story). The aspect of this story never told is the covert effort to get gay Jews into Catholic seminaries.

These laws demanding we accept sexual aberrations as normal, based on false data that have prostituted our children and profaned our lives, are nothing we ever wanted or approved; they are the degenerate plan of master race advocates to morph us into passive automatons, barely conscious, responding only to the commands of our supervisors.

As Freud's master manipulations gave us a society ruled by pill pushing Jewish dissemblers forcing us to eat the feces of their own nihilistic projections, so Jewish controlled Washington has dispensed an endless array of drugs, weapons and mental constrictions on a populace that mostly has never cared about who is taking how much off the top as long as they have their sedatives and distractions secure and nearby.

Mental constructions, media creations, Rumsfeldian productions that allege some terrible thing about someone else, mention that it is our goal to protect these people, then kill large numbers of them, and the American people, at least through what the media tell us, cheer this behavior. If this is you, please step in front of a speeding bus now.

Tyrants never give up their power voluntarily. It's up to those who resist to figure out the components of the tyranny, and dismantle them.

The born gay hoax

http://www.freewebs.com/theborngayhoax/theapa.htm

Prior to December 14, 1973, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) considered same-sex attraction a disorder. The disorder was listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-II (DSM-II) under the label, “Homosexuality.” Psychiatry’s authoritative voice influenced public opinion, which at the time was negative toward both sodomy and the types of people who engaged in such acts. Although public sexual activity in parks and public restrooms contributed to societies negative views, “scientific opinion” was crucial in the public attitude.

In an effort to remove “Homosexuality” from the DSM pro-sodomy activists began a program of intimidation aimed at the American Psychiatric Association circa 1970. Activist Franklin Kameny states the movement’s objective clearly, “I feel that the entire homophile movement…is going to stand or fall upon the question of whether or not homosexuality is a sickness, and upon our taking a firm stand on it…”[1] Franklin Kameny led the Washington D.C. chapter of the Mattachine Society during the 1960’s. In the tradition of Magnus Hirschfield and Alfred Kinsey, Kameny viewed one’s attraction to a specific gender as fluid, and viewed sodomy as morally equivalent to natural sexuality. Led by radicals like Franklin Kameny, pro-sodomy activists attacked psychiatrists across America, asNewsweek describes:

“But even more than the government, it is the psychiatrists who have experienced the full rage of the homosexual activists. Over the past two years, gay-lib organizations have repeatedly disrupted medical meetings, and three months ago—in the movements most aggressive demonstration so far—a group of 30 militants broke into a meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in Washington, where they turned the staid proceedings into near chaos for twenty minutes. ‘We are here to denounce your authority to call us sick or mentally disordered,’ shouted the group’s leader, Dr. Franklin Kameny, while the 2,000 shocked psychiatrists looked on in disbelief. ‘For us, as homosexuals, your profession is the enemy incarnate. We demand that psychiatrists treat us as human beings, not as patients to be cured!’”[2]

Ironically, at the very moment Franklin Kameny was claiming that sodomy was healthy, safe, and natural a deadly virus was silently passing through communities of men all over the nation. Only a decade later, thousands of men would be dead or dying of AIDS.

Homosexual Activists Intimidate American Psychiatric Association into Removing Homosexuality from List of Disorders

Dishonesty and intimidation had won the day for the same-gender sex movement, and when activists publicly claim that this vote was a scientific decision; they hide three years of deceit and intimidation.

http://conservativecolloquium.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/homosexual-activists-intimidate-american-psychiatric-association-into-removing-homosexuality-from-list-of-disorders/

It's very interesting that during the past four decades mainstream media have shined a bright light on the heterosexual trysts of famous politicians and celebrities, from Monica Lewinsky to John Edwards. But the homosexual entanglements of presidents draw nary a raised eyebrow as they are kept secret by media moguls who only reveal secrets that suit them.

Could be that most of the Jewish media moguls, like a significant number of famous politicians, are really closet homos.

In addition to his famous gay bathhouse membership with "friend" and "adviser" and now Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Obama has a string of dead friends (in addition to Larry Sinclair, who also was recently murdered) all alleged to be his sexual partners in his younger days. <http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/11/03/breaking-mother-of-murdered-obamas-gay-partner-speaks-up-1-of-the-3-homosexual-members-of-obamas-trinity-church-murdered/

The gay proclivities of former President George W. Bush have been well documented if totally suppressed by the mainstream, but his famous overnight visits from body building homosexual ex-Marine Jeff Gannon testify to his preference.<http://www.newsfollowup.com/ledeen_8.htm#gannon><http://www.newsfollowup.com/ledeen_8.htm#Abramoff>

Even recently in the news was former president Richard Nixon's allegedly gay relationship with Miami raconteur Bebe Rebozo back in the 1960s and '70s. <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2078822/Did-Nixon-gay-affair-Mafia-fixer-Forget-Watergate-A-new-book-claims-Americas-corrupt-President-hid-far-personal-scandal-.html#ixzz1hheLH5or>

Then throw in the secret Skull & Bones initiation at Yale that compromises initiates with filmed homo behavior as a blackmail tool that guarantees their sticking with the program of the predators who are plundering the world.<http://mindprod.com/politics/bushbooksskullandbones.html>

Combine all these things with the Israeli worldwide sex slavery ring, stealing white girls from impoverished Slavic countries and putting them in brothels around the world; the demonic Talmudic suggestions that it is OK to have sex with children; and the societal push over the course of my lifetime to saturate the world's media with sexual images in order to sell things, and you have a vast substrate of sexual perversion that undermines societies everywhere in the world.

The fabled Jewish fact manipulator Henry Makow, so popular on the false opposition websites for his ability to claim that good Jews are forever being victimized by bad Jews, recently postulated the disinfo theorem that "all pornography is gay", following the policy of the Sanhedrin and the Protocols of Zion to destabilize the heterosexual population.

As usual, Makow, best known for his insistence that the Balfour Declaration that started World War I was a Christian idea and plot, deliberately got it backwards. The real lesson is this. All homosexuality is pornography. And all pornography — this is a well known fact — is Jewish.

This will tell you why the behavior of homosexuals and Jews is so similar.

Which leads us to the the real point, and a solution to the problem — because it is a problem, and a big one — of homosexuality in the world.

It is not homosexuality that is the real problem; it is the sex addiction. Basing a monogamous heterosexual relationship on sex is well known to be a failed emotional strategy that inevitably leads to disillusionment and/or disaster. Yet it is this chimera that all homosexual relationships are based upon — guaranteeing either failure or hypocrisy.

So-called individual freedom advocates down through time have all castigated the repressive dictatorship all religions have insisted upon regarding sexual matters. But what too few residents of this planet have ever understood is that this so-called tyranny in the regulation of sexual relationship by the church was essential to the creation of relatively stable societies.

And we see clearly today that the abandonment of these principles has led to a miscegenative nightmare in a society generally considered to be disintegrating on all levels at this time.

Thus, the real problem is not males who like males, or females who like females, but people who use sex as a drug instead of a sacrament, people for whom sex is an escape from their chosen daily torment rather than a sublime bonding with your best friend, and bridge to the universal vibe that watches out for our welfare every second we know it's there.

The one thing I hope you remember from this story is that homosexuality gained its mainstream approval on the basis of nasty public pressure from an insistent group of flaming faggots, without a shred of medical evidence to back up their claims.

Now we have a White House full of homosexual "czars" ready to wreak their Jewish-taught pathological vengeance on innocent people who have done them no harm. Since first sexual experiences tend to remain the preference for life, how many otherwise healthy lives (because homosexuality is simply not healthy for anyone) have been ruined — with our government's enthusiastic approval?

Did you ever notice that the one significant word that does not appear in the Talmud is love?

Personally, sex without love is something I'd rather not have. But society, pretty much run completely by Jewish pornographers, has taught generations of humans that getting off is more important than getting home.

Beyond the gay problem is a larger dilemma, one the Jews have exploited to destabilize societies everywhere. This is the real gay plague, and it's not limited to homosexuals.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

John Kaminski is a writer who lives on the Gulf Coast of Florida, constantly trying to figure out why we are destroying ourselves, and pinpointing a corrupt belief system as the engine of our demise. Solely dependent on contributions from readers, please support his work by mail: 250 N. McCall Rd. #2, Englewood FL 34223 USA. http://johnkaminski.info/

Mubarak Dug his Own Grave

2011-03-17T00:29:00.003+11:00

By: Mohammed A Hegazi

This idiot of a despot will be remembered as the most inept of all thieves. Together with his own family of gangsters, they robbed the Egyptian people of more than 100 billion US$. One could wonder: What can a person or a family do with one, just one, billion dollars? Bear in mind that the money robbed deprived 85 million people of any hope of a decent future for themselves or their children.

Under this dictator, Egypt finished with 2 million homeless children, who have no family and no social security system of any kind, save for a small number of impoverished charities which could only offer very little for the very few of those poor children. Those unfortunate youngsters had to scavenge for sustenance and shiver through cold nights.

What kind of a human being is this “Mubarak”? The sad irony is that the word “mubarak” in the Arabic language means “blessed”. Makes you wonder if greed could really be a blessing!

Before the Egyptian revolution erupted on 25 January 2011, this idiot had the chance to pacify his people with some genuine reforms. But he was too busy laundering his embezzled billions or shuttling his numerous overseas bank accounts from one haven to another. He was in denial of the fact that the peaceful crowds would eventually depose him in a white revolution unprecedented in human history. He relied heavily on a tight savage security structure.

Mubarak is now waiting precariously on a private resort in Sharm Elsheikh, close to the borders with his sub-human ilk, the Israeli Jews. His loyal generals are gradually abandoning him under pressure from their army subordinates and the Egyptian people. Those generals were hand-picked by Mubarak in order to ensure the loyalty of the army to him.

The generals could not stall for long. It is obvious that they have been weighing their chances. They must be coming to the realisation that they have to come to a decision, better sooner than later. The Egyptian people are not naïve. They do understand that the generals are not exactly clinically clean. But the Egyptian people are also forgiving. The limited corruption of the generals can be forgiven at a very small price: Send Mubarak and his family to the gallows and turn the page. The Egyptian people would forgive your “corruption by association”. They would hail you as heroes if a summary execution of Mubarak and his family could take place before handing over to an elected government.

Libya and Imperialism

2011-03-01T10:52:00.004+11:00

By: Sara Flounders*

February 24, 2011

Of all the struggles going on in North Africa and the Middle East right now, the most difficult to unravel is the one in Libya.

What is the character of the opposition to the Gadhafi regime, which reportedly now controls the eastern city of Benghazi?

Is it just coincidence that the rebellion started in Benghazi, which is north of Libya’s richest oil fields as well as close to most of its oil and gas pipelines, refineries and its LNG port? Is there a plan to partition the country?

What is the risk of imperialist military intervention, which poses the gravest danger for the people of the entire region?

Libya is not like Egypt. Its leader, Moammar al-Gadhafi, has not been an imperialist puppet like Hosni Mubarak. For many years, Gadhafi was allied to countries and movements fighting imperialism. On taking power in 1969 through a military coup, he nationalized Libya’s oil and used much of that money to develop the Libyan economy. Conditions of life improved dramatically for the people.

For that, the imperialists were determined to grind Libya down. The U.S. actually launched air strikes on Tripoli and Benghazi in 1986 that killed 60 people, including Gadhafi’s infant daughter – which is rarely mentioned by the corporate media. Devastating sanctions were imposed by both the U.S. and the U.N. to wreck the Libyan economy.

After the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 and leveled much of Baghdad with a bombing campaign that the Pentagon exultantly called “shock and awe,” Gadhafi tried to ward off further threatened aggression on Libya by making big political and economic concessions to the imperialists. He opened the economy to foreign banks and corporations; he agreed to IMF demands for “structural adjustment,” privatizing many state-owned enterprises and cutting state subsidies on necessities like food and fuel.

The Libyan people are suffering from the same high prices and unemployment that underlie the rebellions elsewhere and that flow from the worldwide capitalist economic crisis.

There can be no doubt that the struggle sweeping the Arab world for political freedom and economic justice has also struck a chord in Libya. There can be no doubt that discontent with the Gadhafi regime is motivating a significant section of the population.

However, it is important for progressives to know that many of the people being promoted in the West as leaders of the opposition are long-time agents of imperialism. The BBC on Feb. 22 showed footage of crowds in Benghazi pulling down the green flag of the republic and replacing it with the flag of the overthrown monarch King Idris – who had been a puppet of U.S. and British imperialism.

The Western media are basing a great deal of their reporting on supposed facts provided by the exile group National Front for the Salvation of Libya, which was trained and financed by the U.S. CIA. Google the front’s name plus CIA and you will find hundreds of references.

The Wall Street Journal in a Feb. 23 editorial wrote that “The U.S. and Europe should help Libyans overthrow the Gadhafi regime.” There is no talk in the board rooms or the corridors of Washington about intervening to help the people of Kuwait or Saudi Arabia or Bahrain overthrow their dictatorial rulers. Even with all the lip service being paid to the mass struggles rocking the region right now, that would be unthinkable. As for Egypt and Tunisia, the imperialists are pulling every string they can to get the masses off the streets.

There was no talk of U.S. intervention to help the Palestinian people of Gaza when thousands died from being blockaded, bombed and invaded by Israel. Just the opposite. The U.S. intervened to prevent condemnation of the Zionist settler state.

Imperialism’s interest in Libya is not hard to find. Bloomberg.com wrote on Feb. 22 that while Libya is Africa’s third-largest producer of oil, it has the continent’s largest proven reserves – 44.3 billion barrels. It is a country with a relatively small population but the potential to produce huge profits for the giant oil companies. That’s how the super-rich look at it, and that’s what underlies their professed concern for the people’s democratic rights in Libya.

Getting concessions out of Gadhafi is not enough for the imperialist oil barons. They want a government that they can own outright, lock, stock and barrel. They have never forgiven Gadhafi for overthrowing the monarchy and nationalizing the oil. Fidel Castro of Cuba in his column “Reflections” takes note of imperialism’s hunger for oil and warns that the U.S. is laying the basis for military intervention in Libya.

In the U.S., some forces are trying to mobilize a street-level campaign promoting such U.S. intervention. We should oppose this outright and remind any well-intentioned people of the millions killed and displaced by U.S. intervention in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Progressive people are in sympathy with what they see as a popular movement in Libya. We can help such a movement most by supporting its just demands while rejecting imperialist intervention, in whatever form it may take. It is the people of Libya who must decide their future.

*Sara Flounders is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=listByAuthor&authorFirst=Sara&authorName=Flounders

A CALL FOR USA REVOLUTION!

2011-02-20T23:05:00.005+11:00

Liberation Square, Cairo

Can The Egyptian Revolution Be Enacted in the USA? Is There an Alternative to Sarah Palin and Newt Gingrich for America?

By: Ziad Shaker elJishi

15/02/2011

I was asked today how America was going to be under Sarah Palin and what I thought a good alternative to her would be?

America under Palin (or Newt Gingrich for that matter) will be a very ugly place especially for the 80% of the population of Americans who are removed from wealth with a large group of which are of poverty line status or below the poverty line. These constitute the majority of Americans who lie outside the 20% who control wealth and political power in the USA today and who in turn will pay the heaviest and dearest of price for Palin's election.

Domestically we would anticipate under Palin that these marginalized groups would suffer tremendously. Groups of the new immigrants, poor White, Black, Latino and others, the poor elderly, the sick, the disabled, the far-removed from wealth and political power would be pushed further into debt, a life-style of consumerism which leads to obesity, more poverty, family breakups, a break-down in moral values, drug-abuse, crime, a life-style seeking instant gratification and constant entertainment, and sickness that leads to death will proliferate.

Violence and crimes will increase while state oppression under the guise of fighting terrorism will make it very difficult for people of Islamic or Arab descent to live freely in the USA. We would see fascistic measures enacted onto the so-called illegal immigrants much like what took place in the state of Arizona.

Under Palin, Reaganomics will be enacted. Here major cuts for the poor will lead to food-lines in the worst case and increased poverty in the best case scenario for the 80% of marginalized in American society. Corporations will do very good, the military will receive an enormous amount of money, "Israel" and other oppressive regimes will receive great aid-packages like the Mubarak regime did for 30 years, while health-care, quality education, and social services will be exclusive to the 20% who constitute the wealthy in the US and to the demise and loss of these services to the 80% majority of others; and finally many many more American soldiers will die.

Under Palin more wars will be waged under the guise of fighting terrorism. More homeland security abuses domestically will be enacted and more militarization and increased budgets for an imperialist foreign policy will be necessary to invade other nations under the excuse of keeping Americans safe-at-home. This will lead to retaliatory attacks against American citizens at home who will have to contend with another 9/11 type attack.

Maquiladoras border towns with Mexico will see increased activities ala NAFTA-style where exploitation of cheap Mexican labor is sought after minus the minimum guarantees for adequate wages, environmental protections, and labor-site safety which will be compromised. Under Palin profit will be more important than people. And people of poverty will pay the heaviest price.

The only real alternative has to be for the 80% of Americans to refuse this in the form of a popular revolt!

A revolt that mimics the footsteps taken by the Egyptian revolution. For such to succeed million men/women marches must come out and must be joined by the lower rank soldiers of America who are dying in America’s wars and nothing short of this critical mass of people has to mobilize across America and enable a true popular revolution to take place. This revolution is a peaceful revolution which can quickly become violent if the oligarchy that governs the US today decides to mobilize the National Guard against it as it did in Ronald Reagan's time.

These popular marches must bring to an end the rule of the oligarchy that governs the US today and comprises of a minority 20% of the wealthy and their lobby groups who are serving corporate interests, the Zionists, the bankers, and media and Hollywood tycoons, the military generals, and the dynasties that govern the United States today and comprise of the likes of the Bush dynasty and Clinton dynasty.

Instead the popular masses need to demand that this oligarchy step-down from office. To leave power to a truly popular vote which necessitates we get rid of the two-party system of no choice! And to instill in its place a multi-party system of all political persuasions. From the right to the left. And here I am not talking about the Republican and Democratic parties as the right and leftIam talking about a real right and left.

I am talking about a conservative party, liberal party, socialist party, nationalist party, religious parties (Islamic, Christian, and others), atheist party, green party.

These Egyptian style protestations will demand an end to the two-party system in the USA to be replaced by a mutli-party system and people Parliament where all political opinions are represented. To demand a popular president who is elected by popular vote and to get rid of the electoral-college which is to be replaced by a true popular voting system that enables participation of the 80% of Americans who largely are currently outside of the election process. In 2008 for example voter turn out was less than 57% which is considered high. Federal voter turnout historically can reach as low as 37% such as that took place in 2006 in non-presidential elections.

These protests must demand an end to the rule of the oligarchy in America, amendments to the US constitution subject to a public referendum to be decided on by the majority of the people, and re-structuring of the three branches of government where a people Parliament with multi-party representation takes place and popular free elections take place for a popular president.

That is the correct alternative and only choice available to the marginalized groups of Americans who constitute the majority in America today if a true and fundamental change is to affect their lives for the better.

MUBARAK: THE DILEMMA OF A FAILED DICTATOR

2011-02-05T13:55:00.005+11:00

By: Mohammed A Hegazi

History is littered with the names of ruthless dictators who suppressed their people for what they thought were worthwhile objectives. We had Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin, Mao Zedong, Gamal Abdul Nasser, Rubert Mugabe, idi Amin and Saddam Hussein, to mention only a few. They all had one thing in common: They had a purpose and a vision for their countries, towards which they took the wrong path. You could agree or disagree with their ideologies, but you cannot deny that each and every one of them had an ideology that made of him a historical figure.

I tried hard to place this shrimp, Hosny Mubarak, among them. He did not fit. He is a nobody among dictators, or even among ordinary men. He lacks talent, charisma, statesmanship or any worthwhile quality that would help classify him. He is just a lacklustre imbecile, who amazingly managed to suppress a great people for over 30 years.

After boring you with this lengthy introduction, I come to the point: Today is the fifth of February 2011. Egypt has been in turmoil for 11 days asking Mubarak to step down. Hundreds of thousands are defying a curfew and standing fast in Tahrir (Liberation) Square in downtown Cairo. More people are demonstrating in all major cities from Damietta in the North of Egypt to Aswan in the South.

Mubarak refuses to step down. His American-Israeli sponsors are sending very clear signals to him that they can no longer support him. The message failed to get through his thick skull. He still believes in the strength of his police state, which is gradually crumbling, and the effect of his propaganda machine on rebelling Egyptians. It is clear that the idiot is under-estimating the fact that we live in an age where the flow of news and information cannot be blocked. He imposed bans on the Internet and mobile texting, but failed to realise that the skies are full of satellites beaming TV broadcasts. He began to chase foreign correspondents and even kill some of them, a policy that backfired and angered even the closest of his allies.

What has this idiot achieved? He blocked all possible avenues of a safe face-saving exit. He cannot persist or prevail in the face of an unrelenting popular revolt that could turn nasty at any moment and could very well end in having him lynched in Liberation Square.

A ZIONIST JEW NAMED JON FAINE

2010-11-03T20:42:00.016+11:00

Kevin Bracken

By: Mohammed A Hegazi

In Australia, and elsewhere, fanatic Jews creep-on to government owned media, spouting their venom at taxpayers’ expense. "Jon Faine" hosts a talk program on ABC radio. He managed to gain undeserved popularity for years, pretending to be fair and seeking the truth.

Faine kept on faring freely until "Kevin Bracken" got-on to his program in order to raise the alarm about the reality of what happened in New York and Washington on 11/09/2001, when the world was conned into the belief that a dozen ”Islamic Terrorists” invaded America.

The attitude of Faine was rude and dismissive, while Bracken gave him no chance to mislead the listeners. Bracken remained cool and collected, while Faine rudely uttered nothing but nonsense and irrelevant trash. The dialogue ended with Bracken challenging Faine to a debate, while Faine tucked his tail between his legs and ran off mumbling silly comments. I would rather let you listen to excerpts of the exchange and a brilliant commentary by Anthony Lawson. Click on the link below, or watch the uploaded video at the end of the article:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE3pMPObcGU&feature=related

That was not the end of this revealing incident. Cowardly politicians were quick to condemn Kevin Bracken in the most derogatory terms. Julia Gillard exposed herself as another pale copy of John Howard. Mind you that the main discipline in Bracken’s qualifications is engineering, while the main occupation of those people is gutter politics. They do not represent average honest educated Australians. Bracken knew what he was talking about, and why the official narrative of 911 is scientifically flawed. Those cowardly politicians are representing the interests of Zionist USA. They do not care about the interests and security of Australia. Watch this and try not to vomit:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LlBj-ftRno&feature=related

What a freebie!

2010-09-19T11:26:00.005+10:00

YOM KIPPUR

A License to Lie,

Cheat & Steal

Today Jews around the world are gathering to celebrate the

most holy day on the Jewish calendar. It is called Yom Kippur,

or the Day of Atonement.

At synagogues everywhere worshippers will be reciting the
so-called Kol Nidre prayer. Taken from the first two Hebrew words

of the prayer, "Kol Nidre" means "all vows."

The goyim* are told that Yom Kippur is an occasion when pious,

saintly Jews approach their Maker in a penitential rite to beg his

forgiveness for wrongs they have committed during the past year.

RUBBISH! The occasion is nothing less than a time when Jews ask

for and receive absolution for all the sins and wrongs they are about

to commit—IN THE COMING YEAR! In so doing, they cut a lawyer's

deal with their god (whom they call YHWH, or Yahweh) that gives

them an exemption in advance from all wrongdoing.

Here is the actual text of this outrageous "prayer":

"All vows, obligations, oaths or anathemas, pledges of all names,

which we have vowed, sworn, devoted or bound ourselves to,
from this day of atonement, until the next day of atonement,
we repent, aforehand, of them all; they shall all be deemed absolved,
forgiven, annulled, void and made of no effect; they shall not be

binding, nor have any power; the vows shall not be reckoned as vows,

the obligations shall not be obligatory, nor the oaths considered

as oaths."

That's pretty clear, unambiguous language. What we have here,

in fact, is nothing less than a one-year, renewable license to lie,

cheat and steal with impunity, all based on a decree from the

Jews' so-called holy book, which says:

"And he who desires that none of his vows made during the year

shall be valid, let him stand at the beginning of the year and declare,

'Every vow which I make in the future shall be null.'"

(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Nedarim 23a & 23b)

Among those who will be reciting the Kol Nidre oath at this time are

Jewish politicians, lawyers, judges, corporate executives, businessmen,

journalists and public officials. It should be noted that any oaths they

may take to uphold and defend the Constitution or otherwise tell the

truth are, as of tonight, "abandoned, cancelled, null and void" and

rendered "without power and without standing."

Isn't that nice?

* A derogatory Hebrew word for non-Jews

_______________________________

THIS MESSAGE IS BROUGHT TO YOU AS A PUBLIC SERVICE BY THE —

NEW ORDER

Dept E

PO Box 270486

Milwaukee WI 53227

http://www.theneworder.org

CHRISTIAN ZIONISM

2010-04-15T07:38:00.002+10:00

CHRISTIAN ZIONISM WILL KILL POPULIST REVOLT

By Rev. Ted Pike*
12 Apr 10

A fanatic is "possessed by an excessive and irrational zeal for a religious or political cause" (American Heritage Dictionary). Today, two types of fanaticism threaten the safety of our republic and the future of our populist revolt. The first is Christian Zionism. The second is right-wing calls for violence.

Contradicting the Bible, Christian Zionism says Jews and Israel are favored above all other races and nations, no matter what they do. Most Christian Zionists believe God will curse anyone who criticizes Israel. Jewish supremacists—whose ancestors founded communism and its offspring, liberalism—today corrupt the Gentile world through their predominant influence in international banking, Congress, and big media.

This weakening of Gentile power is encouraged by Jewish Talmudic/Kabbalistic scripture so that the Jewish messiah can someday rule the nations. Nevertheless, most Christian evangelicals ignorantly preach and practice ironclad non-criticism of everything Jewish. This formula is taken so far that no major Christian, conservative leadership group will criticize the Jewish Anti-Defamation League, despite its anti-Christian, pro-homosexual agenda and creation of Christian-persecuting hate crime laws worldwide.

The second fanaticism that threatens freedom is revealed in those who call for imminent violence to overthrow our government. An example may be the nine Hutaree militia members who allegedly planned to jumpstart revolution by killing a policeman, then bombing police at his funeral. If guilty as charged, the Hutaree held both forms of fanaticism. Their website displays "Seven Reasons Why Christians Should Support Israel."

Contrary to media spin, they were not anti-Semitic. Their stated intent of supporting Israel unconditionally is the same position held by Pastor John Hagee, Dr. Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson. A militia leader told me that in 2007 he visited the now arrested leader of the Hutarees, David Brian Stone; he said Stone's headquarters were decorated with flags of Israel and the leader angrily denounced any critique of Israel as "anti-Semitic."

This underscores an ominous reality. Pro-Israel fanaticism, with its welcoming invitation to supremacist Jews, runs so deep everywhere in the Christian right that it would continue, even if a government overthrow did take place. The pattern of supremacist Jews hijacking a conservative "revolution" already occurred in recent history. In 1980, Ronald Reagan accomplished his own coup against liberalism. The "Reagan Revolution" brought new respect for conservatism in America. Immediately, Jews flooded the movement, creating the Jewish "neoconservative" faction of the Republican Party. This Jewish lobby's insistence on special favors to Israel helped pressure Pres. George W. Bush to invade Iraq, protecting Israel from Saddam's "weapons of mass destruction" – which were never found. The same Jewish neo-cons goaded Bush to invade Afghanistan after 9/11**, again to secure the safety of Israel. These two wars, promoted by Israeli dual-loyalists high in Republican circles, gave the Democrats the anti-war issue they needed to end Republican credibility and elect Obama. Now, the same pressure is witheringly applied on the Obama administration to take military action against Iran, again to insure the safety of a greater Israel.

What does America really need?

Through education and return to sound, Biblical interpretation, we need to overthrow the power of Jewish supremacism. It will do little good to topple the present government if this is not confronted. With incredible speed, supremacist Jews will only resurface like toxic mushrooms after a thundershower. Incredibly, triumphant evangelicals like Sarah Palin would be the first to invite such Jews to participate. A violent revolution would only substitute one Jewish-controlled government for another.

Instead, there must be a complete willingness to examine Jewish power and motives, and how they brought us to the straits we are in. Up to this point, Christian, conservative leaders have refused such inquiry. What America needs now is not radical revolution—but radical reevaluation of how supremacist Jews have ruined, and will continue to ruin, our hopes.

* Rev. Ted Pike (born Theodore Winston Pike) is an American clergyman and director of the National Prayer Network, filmmaker and author. He has produced such films as Unholy Alliance, Why the Mid-East Bleeds, and The Other Israel. Pike's work contains fierce criticism of Jews and of Israel and references to a Global Jewish conspiracy. He is also an outspoken critic of the Anti-Defamation League.

** 911 is a code name adopted for the destruction of the world trade centre by explosives and hitting the pentagon by a missile on 11 September 2001. It was an operation carried out by the Israeli Mossad in collaboration with rogue elements in the CIA and the US government. Proper investigation of the crime has been vehemently and persistently refused by both Bush and Obama. Any scientific investigation would dispel the flimsy flawed explanations propagated by the US government.

INTERNET SECURITY

2010-03-21T14:51:00.008+11:00

Spying on the net has been rife since day one. What has changed is our awareness of its existence as users of the web. There is no security when it comes to bodies such as the CIA, AFP and a myriad of other secret agencies, with or without the support of your ISP.

Like most users of the net, I installed the usual firewalls, antivirus, spyware removers, etc. Nothing seemed to work against my adversaries. When I got sick of the frequent loss of files and changes to my pc settings, I decided to do the logical thing. I had a second pc that is never connected to the net, where no meddling can take place.

Nothing of any value to me, or to them, is left on my ”Internet pc”. It is almost blank. Anything worthwhile is downloaded to an USB pen, then stored on my “no-connection pc”. Any problems created on my “internet pc” can readily be fixed.

The only problem that remained was fax and email communication. Selected incoming and outgoing messages end in a black hole. The aim of the culprit is to sever communication with like-minded activists overseas. I got over that by phone communication.

The game is not devoid of some funny moments. One of the kids on night shift got bored. So, he (it had to be a he because a she would act more responsibly) decided to block my access to my yahoo email account. Not only that he did so, but he also wanted to reveal his identity. I took the above photo of the frozen non-responsive Yahoo logon page. The red square on the top right-hand side displayed the message: AFP ARE USELESS NUTS.

I tried to tell the lad that I did not disagree with his message, but I had no means of telling him other than to write this article, in the hope that some wise high ranking AFP officer might read it and remind those aspiring young lads that their job is to spy, not to interfere.

WILL AMERICANS WAKE UP?

2010-03-08T10:49:00.004+11:00

The 911 lie lingered on since 11 September 2001. Zionist Jews planned and executed the crime, but made it look as if it were committed by “Moslem terrorists”. It was claimed that a handful of young Arabs received instruction on how to fly jumbo passenger planes. They also were claimed to have left behind some “do it yourself” manuals. All was done under the supervision of the mythical maverick Osama Bin Laden.

Enlightened scholars were shocked by the obvious fallacies and blatant scientific lies dressed as indisputable facts. They echoed their opposition to the flawed official whitewash. They continue to demand a fresh investigation.

Fallacies like the Jewish Holohoax (Holocaust) continued against all historical investigation. The six million lies story still have its adherents because of the lack of tangible evidence after so many years. But in the case of 911, the evidence is there. It will continue to present itself because the crime has been recorded on video tape. It has since been digitised and thoroughly analysed. No one can destroy the evidence that the WTC buildings were pulled down by controlled demolition, and the pentagon hit by a rocket. What is being sought now is to admit and declare the confirmation of specialists in the fields of chemistry, physics, engineering, aviation, defence, fire fighting and all related areas of human knowledge.

Various patriotic bodies in the USA are reaching out to the millions of deluded Americans. The following message by Ted Walter is an example of this snowballing trend:

March 7, 2010

Dear Vote For Answers Supporter,

On behalf of our friends in the Monadnock 9/11 Truth Alliance, we thank you for donating generously to the Vote For Answers New Hampshire campaign.

Together we raised $2,753 to help the dedicated activists in New Hampshire publicize their campaign effectively. A perfect combination of endorsements from local leaders, mainstream local media coverage, and ads in local newspapers have made 9/11 a major topic of discussion throughout New Hampshire. For the first time ever, the New Hampshire media have covered the pursuit of truth in a truly unbiased and positive manner.

On Tuesday, March 9, eight of the twelve towns where the Vote For Answers resolution is being considered will cast their votes, and on Saturday, March 13, a ninth town will vote. The last three towns will cast their votes in early May.

These are two of several ads we were able to put in local newspapers thanks to your support.

In authentically democratic fashion, most of these votes will take place by a show of hands from the dozens or hundreds in attendance at the town meeting. This will give the Vote For Answers activists in each town the opportunity to speak to those in attendance about the need for a new 9/11 investigation. Together with NYC CAN they have developed a uniform approach for presenting in the town meetings, which will be 1) to read the statement in the above ad signed by eight military veterans and former Arizona State Senator Karen Johnson, 2) to read the statement signed by former Keene Mayor Michael Blastos and six current and former State Representatives, and 3) to convey a concise set of talking points related to the 9/11 Commission’s admissions of failure.

We have also undertaken a coordinated effort to get all of the petition signers to attend the town meetings and vote in favor of the resolution. That coupled with all of the publicity and the apparent lack of any opposition makes us confident the resolution will pass in most towns.

Success at the town meetings will lead to many things. Former Keene Mayor Michael Blastos and the Monadnock 9/11 Truth Alliance will work on getting the Keene City Council and other City Councils to pass their own resolutions; NYC CAN will use the momentum to launch campaigns in several other states and to apprise elected officials in New York City of the mounting support for reinvestigating 9/11.

We will inform you of the results once they come in, so please stay tuned!

Thank you for donating and thank you for believing in our style of advocacy. By creating public dialogue through the ballot box we are opening the eyes of tens of thousands of New Hampshire citizens who would have otherwise thought it crazy to question 9/11. Together we are taking one more important step in the march toward truth.

Sincerely,

Ted Walter
Executive Director

Thinkers think and talkers talk. Patriots ACT.

NYCCAN.org

VoteForAnswersNH.com

Bravo Spain!

2010-03-04T23:06:00.002+11:00

Israeli embassy complains over 'antisemitic' postcards from Spanish children

Spokesman voices anger after Valencia primary schoolchildren sent 'disturbing' messages about war, money and killing children

* guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 2 March 2010

A Palestinian woman surveys her destroyed house after an Israeli air strike in Jabalya in Gaza

The Israeli embassy in Madrid has complained of antisemitic postcards from Spanish schoolchildren. Israel has complained to the Spanish authorities after its embassy in Madrid received postcards from nine-year-old schoolchildren accusing it of killing Palestinian babies and waging war for money.

A spokesman accused the Spanish government of allowing state schools to be used to promote hatred of both Jews and Israel in a country it claims already ranks as one of the most antisemitic in Europe.

The complaint came after eight and nine-year-olds from a state primary school in Almoines, near Valencia, sent the Israeli ambassador a series of cards which also suggested Israelis should abandon their country and hand it over to the Palestinians.

"Some had very disturbing messages," an embassy spokesman said. "They asked things such as: 'Why do you kill children?' or said that 'money is not everything' and that if someone should leave, it should be the Israelis 'because it is not your land'.

"These are messages about a political situation that they do not understand. Most of these children probably do not even know where Israel or Palestine are."

The postcards had gone beyond legitimate debate about Israeli policy and contained racist insults, he added.

"The connection between Jews and money is an old stereotype, and killing babies is also a stereotype that was used in Spain in the dark ages," he added. "We thought it was part of the past, but obviously it is not."

Joan Malonda, the head teacher of El Castell primary school in Almoines, today confirmed that the hand-drawn cards had come from his pupils.

He denied the children were being indoctrinated, adding: "A lot of this work was done at home and reflects the atmosphere in their own social environment. They were simply asked to write a postcard on the subject.

"We try to teach the children to have a critical attitude, but we also want them to contrast their criticism against other points of view."

Malonda, who received the backing of parents when he fought off attempts by local authorities to remove him from his post last year, said he would welcome an approach from the Israeli embassy.

"We haven't heard back from them," he said.

JEWISH NEO-CONMAN HAS A PLAN

2010-02-09T11:47:00.002+11:00

Zionist Jews will never run out of ideas in order to sap the energy of the United States and help its premature death. A Jew who was instrumental in getting the US into a bloody quagmire in Iraq now has a plan to do the same for the US in Iran. It is not a new formula. When Roosevelt was unable to get the United States out of the Great Depression, the Jews solved the problem and saved his presidency by rallying everyone around the flag and getting the country into a war against Germany. When Zionists wanted a pipeline to transport oil through Afghanistan, they orchestrated the demolition of the World Trade Center in New York and shoving a rocket into the Pentagon in 2001. Read what this devil of a Jew is advocating:

BOMB IRAN!

Obama needs dramatic gesture to save presidency

By: DANIEL PIPES

I do not customarily offer advice to a president whose election I opposed,
whose goals I fear and whose policies I work against. But here is a way
for Barack Obama to salvage his tottering administration by taking a step
that protects the US and its allies.

If Obama’s personality, identity and celebrity captivated a majority of the
American electorate in 2008, those qualities proved ruefully deficient in
2009. He failed to deliver on employment and health care, he failed in
foreign policy forays small (e.g., landing the 2016 Olympics) and large
(relations with China and Japan). His counterterrorism record barely
passes the laugh test.

This poor performance has caused an unprecedented collapse in the polls
and the loss of three major by-elections, culminating two weeks ago in an
astonishing senatorial defeat in Massachusetts. Obama’s attempts to “reset”
his presidency will likely fail if he focuses on economics, where he is just
one of many players.

He needs a dramatic gesture to change the public perception of him as a
lightweight, bumbling ideologue, preferably in an arena where the stakes
are high, where he can take charge and where he can trump expectations.

Such an opportunity does exist: Obama can order the US military to destroy
Iran’s nuclear weapons capacity.

Circumstances are propitious. First, US intelligence agencies have reversed
the preposterous 2007 National Intelligence Estimate that claimed with
“high confidence” that Teheran had “halted its nuclear weapons program.”
No one (other than the Iranian rulers and their agents) denies that the
regime is rushing headlong to build a nuclear arsenal.

Second, if the apocalyptic-minded leaders in Teheran get the Bomb,
they render the Middle East yet more volatile and dangerous. They might
deploy these weapons in the region, leading to massive death and
destruction. Or they could launch an electromagnetic pulse attack on the
US, devastating the country. By eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat,
Obama protects the homeland and sends a message to America’s friends
and enemies.

Third, polling shows long-standing American backing for an attack on
the Iranian nuclear infrastructure.

• A Los Angeles Times/Bloomberg poll in January 2006 found that 57%
of Americans favored military intervention if Teheran pursues a program
that could enable it to build nuclear arms.

• A Zogby International poll in October 2007 found that 52% of likely
voters supported a US military strike to prevent Iran from building a
nuclear weapon; 29% opposed such a step.

• McLaughlin & Associates in May 2009 asked whether people would
support “using the [US] military to attack and destroy the facilities in Iran
which are necessary to produce a nuclear weapon”; 58% of 600 likely
voters supported the use of force and 30% opposed it.

• Fox News in September 2009 asked: “Do you support or oppose the
United States taking military action to keep Iran from getting nuclear
weapons?” Sixty-one percent of 900 registered voters supported military
action and 28% opposed it.

• Pew Research Center in October 2009 asked which is more important,
“to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons, even if it means
taking military action” or “to avoid a military conflict with Iran, even if
it means they may develop nuclear weapons”; of 1,500 respondents,
61% favored the first reply and 24% the second.

Not only does a strong majority – 57%, 52%, 58%, 61% and 61% – already
favor using force, but after a strike Americans will presumably rally
around the flag, pushing that number much higher.

Fourth, were the US strike limited to taking out Iran’s nuclear facilities,
and not aspiring to regime change, it would require few “boots on the
ground” and entail relatively few casualties, making an attack politically
more palatable.

Just as 9/11 caused voters to forget George W. Bush’s meandering early
months, a strike on the Iranian facilities would dispatch Obama’s feckless
first year down the memory hole and transform the domestic political scene.
It would sideline health care, prompt Republicans to work with Democrats,
make netroots squeal, independents reconsider and conservatives swoon.

But the chance to do good and do well is fleeting. As the Iranians improve
their defenses and approach weaponization, the window of opportunity is
closing. The time to act is now or, on Obama’s watch, the world will soon
become a much more dangerous place.

8 February 2010 / 24 Shevat 5770

The Jerusalem Post

AN INVENTION CALLED BIN LADEN

2009-12-13T09:30:00.014+11:00

False photos of Bin Laden who died in 2001 were concocted by CIA and propagated by Aljazeerah TV

US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long Dead

By: Gordon Duff*
December 10, 2009

Conservative commentator, former Marine Colonel Bob Pappas has been saying for years that bin Laden died at Tora Bora and that Senator Kerry's claim that bin Laden escaped with Bush help was a lie. Now we know that Pappas was correct. The embarassment of having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December 13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn't nuts is finally saying what they have known for years.

However, since we lost a couple of hundred of our top special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after we knew he was dead, is someone going to answer for this with some jail time? Since we spent 200 million dollars on "special ops" looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the US? This is a criminal act if there ever was one.

In 66 pages, General Stanley McChrystal never mentions Osama bin Laden. Everything is "Mullah Omar" now. In his talk at West Point, President Obama never mentioned Osama bin Laden. Col. Pappas makes it clear, Vice President Cheney let it "out of the bag" long ago. Bin Laden was killed by American troops many many years ago.

America knew Osama bin Laden died December 13, 2001. After that, his use was hardly one to unite America but rather one to divide, scam and play games. With bin Laden gone, we could have started legitimate nation building in Afghanistan instead of the eternal insurgency that we invented ourselves.

Without our ill informed policies, we could have had a brought diplomatic solution in 2002 in Afghanistan, the one we are ignoring now, and spent money rebuilding the country, 5 cents on the dollar compared to what we are spending fighting a war against an enemy we ourselves recruited thru ignorance.

The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts ever perpetrated against the American people. We don't even know if he really was an enemy, certainly he was never the person that Bush and Cheney said. In fact, the Bush and bin Laden families were always close friends and had been for many years.

What kind of man was Osama bin Laden? This one time American ally against Russia, son of a wealthy Saudi family, went to Afghanistan to help them fight for their freedom. America saw him as a great hero then. Transcripts of the real bin Laden show him to be much more moderate than we claim, angry at Israel and the US government but showing no anger toward Americans and never making the kind of threats claimed. All of this is public record for any with the will to learn.

How much of America's tragedy is tied with these two children of the rich, children of families long joined thru money and friendship, the Bush and bin Laden clans.One son died in remote mountains, another lives in a Dallas suburb hoping nobody is sent after him. One is a combat veteran, one never took a strong stand unless done from safety and comfort. Islam once saw bin Laden as a great leader. Now he is mostly forgotten.

What has America decided about Bush?

We know this: Bin Laden always denied any ties to 9/11 and, in fact, has never been charged in relation to 9/11. He not only denied involvement, but had done so, while alive, 4 times and had vigorously condemned those who were involved in the attack.

This is on the public record, public in every free country except ours. We, instead, showed films made by paid actors, made up to look somewhat similar to bin Laden, actors who contradicted bin Laden’s very public statements, actors pretending to be bin Laden long after bin Laden's death.

These were done to help justify spending, repressive laws, torture and simple thievery.

For years, we attacked the government of Pakistan for not hunting down someone everyone knew was dead. Bin Laden's death hit the newspapers in Pakistan on December 15, 2001. How do you think our ally felt when they were continually berated for failing to hunt down and turn over someone who didn't exist?

What do you think this did for American credibility in Pakistan and thru the Islamic world? Were we seen as criminals, liars or simply fools? Which one is best? This is also treason.

How does the death of bin Laden and the defeat and dismemberment of Al Qaeda impact the intelligence assessments, partially based on, not only bin Laden but Al Qaeda activity in Iraq that, not only never happened but was now known to have been unable to happen?

How many "Pentagon Pundits," the retired officers who sold their honor to send us to war for what is now known to be domestic political dirty tricks and not national security are culpable in these crimes?

I don't always agree with Col. Pappas on things. I believe his politics overrule his judgement at times. However, we totally agree on bin Laden, simply disagree with what it means. To me lying and sending men to their deaths based on lies is treason.

Falsifying military intelligence and spending billions on unnecessary military operations for political reasons is an abomination. Consider this, giving billions in contracts to GOP friends who fill campaign coffers, and doing so based on falsified intelligence is insane. This was done for years.

We spent 8 years chasing a dead man, spending billions, sending FBI agents, the CIA, Navy Seals, Marine Force Recon, Special Forces, many to their deaths, as part of a political campaign to justify running American into debt, enriching a pack of political cronies and war profiteers and to puff up a pack of Pentagon peacocks and their Whitehouse draft dodging bosses.

How many laws were pushed thru because of a dead man?

How many hundreds were tortured to find a dead man?

How many hundreds died looking for a dead man?

How many billions were spent looking for a dead man?

Every time Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld stood before troops and talked about hunting down the dead bin Laden, it was a dishonor. Lying to men and women who put their lives on the line is not a joke. Who is going to answer to the families of those who died for the politics and profit tied to the Hunt for Bin Laden?

* Gordon Duff is a US Marine combat veteran and regular contributor on political and social issues. He is Senior Editor of “Veterans Today”.

A VISIT BY FREDRICK TOBEN

2009-12-04T10:41:00.006+11:00

Latest photo of Fredrick Toben in Australian prison at Cadell

I was sitting quietly in my study room reflecting on the reasons for the steady decline of the evil American empire. I had on my computer screen a graph showing the diminishing amount of Euros US dollars could buy. Mathematically, the trend showed no respite for those useless green pieces of paper. Their value will continue to decline until they become cheaper than toilet paper. Historically, whenever American economy weakened, Jews who run America created a flimsy reason in order to wage a war in some miserable small country far away from home, while the average American fat nuts continued to patriotically wave their rags of stars and stripes. Political analysts are almost in total agreement that another war is unlikely. I tend to differ, those bastards thrive on war and destruction. They have no regard for human life. The only wars on American soil had to be civil wars, and they are heading for one between the ruling Jewish machine and the rest of the impoverished population who are beginning to realise that their country has been highjacked.

The phone ringing cut my thoughts and the familiar voice of Fredrick Toben at the other end came with a cheerful tone, “Mohammed, I am in Melbourne right now, driving through St. Kilda (Jewsville!), where and when could we have a cuppa?. My home was a suitable venue and ASAP was a suitable time. Fredrick looked amazingly slim and active. I asked him about the delay of his new book to which he answered that he would soon see the publishers in America.

- What? Are you really planning to travel to that God-forsaken piece of shit (pardon my French)?
- Yes.
- I would not go there even if I were offered free passage and free five-star accommodation. I would rather visit Iran and enjoy good manners and sincere modest hospitality. The country oozes culture and moral values. Americans are the descendants of rogue adventurers. They seem to be criminals by nature. They did prove it in their insignificant short history of a few hundred years.
- Mohammed! They are not all that bad. It is only because of the political elite who took over the country.
- Come on Freddie, do they import soldiers from Mars in order to do the killing in Iraq and Afghanistan?
- Thanks Mohammed, I don’t have sugar with my coffee.
- A piece of cake?
- No thanks, I am on diet.

HOW JEWS RUN THE USA

2009-11-02T13:58:00.007+11:00

This scene is not unique. It can happen wherever Jews constitute a majority. They have their own agendas and receive instructions as to how to vote. There is no need to pay attention to any discussion.

House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, pictured standing, far right, speaks while colleagues Rep. Barbara Lambert, D-Milford and Rep. Jack F. Hennessy, D-Bridgeport, play solitaire, as the House convened to vote on a new budget. The guy sitting in the row in front of these jokers is on Facebook, and the guy behind Hennessy is checking out the baseball scores.

These are the Jews who are bringing down the USA to its inevitable demise in the not-so-distant future. It could happen much sooner than expected, while those Jewish yo-yo’s might still be playing solitaire.

REPORT ON FREDRICK TOBEN

2009-10-15T12:03:00.008+11:00

For those who do not know Fredrick Toben, he is an outstanding and outspoken revisionist. His work is dedicated to exposing the fallacy of the mythical so-called “Jewish Holocaust”. The dogmatic assertion by fanatic Jews, that six million of their tribe were gassed and roasted by the Germans, is a sick joke that has been marketed by the Jew-controlled mass media since WW2. Revisionists are out to expose this filthy lie.

Jews have been relying on this lie, in order to milk sympathy and reparations from a gullible world that has been captive to the Jew media until the advent of the Internet. It is this marvellous new medium, the Internet, that enables you to read these humble lines and to exchange messages and opinions in real time. Jews failed to distract serious work on the Internet by their pornography sites. So, they are now trying the legal backdoor in order to shut down sites that expose their activities.

Toben has been recently framed by three Australian Jewish judges, in a high court, and sent to prison on account of a flimsy Jewish allegation of “contempt of court”. The alleged contempt charge emanated from his refusal to stop exposing the Holohoax lie, according to an order from an Australian Jewish judge, in a lower court.

Dr. Fredrick Toben, who committed no crime, was unfairly arrested on 13/08/2009 and taken to a low security prison in a small South Australian country town called “Cadell”, where he is staying for a prison term of three months, until 12/11/2009.

I paid Toben a visit on 10/10/2009, together with our mutual friend Peter Hartung. Peter is the present director of Adelaide Institute, an organisation that is causing Jews much trouble by being on the alert exposing their lies. Peter lives in the city of Adelaide, which is less than 200 km from Cadell. This enabled him to pay frequent visits to Fredrick. On the way, I asked Peter, “How is Fred coping?” He replied, “Fred is in great shape. He is more determined than ever to continue the fight after this minor hiccup.”

We arrived to Cadell at one o’clock. We had to wait until the “prisoner” came to the visitors area. We were allowed to stay for three hours under the indirect surveillance of the prison guards. We had a “picnic lunch” with Fred and discussed our future plans of our long protracted fight against Jewish distortion of history.

Trying to comfort, or probably tease, Fred I commented, “Any change is healthy, even a short spell in prison would be!” Fred spontaneously shouted back, “What? Let the bastards wait until I get out of here. Don’t you worry Mohammed, I understand the mentality of those people.”

To all friends of Fredrick Toben, he is fit and well. In his captivity, he would have had the time to think. I gathered that he would come out with a thunderous new book that would send shock waves down the spine of the cowardly vermin that sent him to prison, on account of expressing his opinions. It all happened because Australian Jews managed to pass unconstitutional laws that infringe upon the right of all Australians to free speech.

BLAIR THE BLATANT HABITUAL LIAR FULLY EXPOSED

2009-10-13T07:40:00.017+11:00

Here are some of the key statements made by Blair, as prime minister, about Saddam Hussein's weapons - before and after the war. [Source: BBC archives]

10 April 2002, House of Commons
"Saddam Hussein's regime is despicable, he is developing weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot leave him doing so unchecked.
"He is a threat to his own people and to the region and, if allowed to develop these weapons, a threat to us also."
Full story

24 September 2002, House of Commons
"It [the intelligence service] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population; and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability..."
Full story

25 February 2003, House of Commons
"The intelligence is clear: (Saddam) continues to believe his WMD programme is essential both for internal repression and for external aggression.
"The biological agents we believe Iraq can produce include anthrax, botulinum, toxin, aflatoxin and ricin. All eventually result in excruciatingly painful death."
Full story

11 March 2003, MTV debate
"If we don't act now, then we will go back to what has happened before and then of course the whole thing begins again and he carries on developing these weapons and these are dangerous weapons, particularly if they fall into the hands of terrorists who we know want to use these weapons if they can get them."
Full story

18 March 2003, House of Commons
"We are asked now seriously to accept that in the last few years-contrary to all history, contrary to all intelligence-Saddam decided unilaterally to destroy those weapons. I say that such a claim is palpably absurd."
Full story

4 June 2003, House of Commons
"There are literally thousands of sites. As I was told in Iraq, information is coming in the entire time, but it is only now that the Iraq survey group has been put together that a dedicated team of people, which includes former UN inspectors, scientists and experts, will be able to go in and do the job properly.
"As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction."
Full story

8 July 2003, Evidence to Commons liaison committee
"I don't concede it at all that the intelligence at the time was wrong.
"I have absolutely no doubt at all that we will find evidence of weapons of mass destruction programmes."
Full story

16 December 2003, Interview with British Forces Broadcasting Service
"The Iraq Survey Group has already found massive evidence of a huge system of clandestine laboratories, workings by scientists, plans to develop long range ballistic missiles."
Full story

16 December 2003, Interview with BBC Arabic Service
"I don't think it's surprising we will have to look for them. I'm confident that when the Iraq Survey Group has done its work we will find what's happened to those weapons because he had them."
4 January, 2004, Speech to British forces near Basra, Iraq
"Repressive states are developing weapons that could cause destruction on a massive scale."
Full story

11 January 2004 , Interview with BBC Breakfast with Frost
What you can say is that we received that intelligence about Saddam's programmes and about his weapons that we acted on that, it's the case throughout the whole of the conflict.
I remember having conversations with the chief of defence staff and other people were saying well, we think we might have potential WMD find here or there.
Now these things didn't actually come to anything in the end, but I don't know is the answer. And what I do know is that the group of people that are in there now, this Iraq survey group, they produced an interim report."
Full story

25 January 2004, Interview with the Observer newspaper
"I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the intelligence was genuine.
"It is absurd to say in respect of any intelligence that it is infallible, but if you ask me what I believe, I believe the intelligence was correct, and I think in the end we will have an explanation."
Full story

3 February, 2004, evidence to Commons liaison committee
"What is true about (ex-Iraq Survey Group head) David Kay's evidence, and this is something I have to accept, and is one of the reasons why I think we now need a new inquiry - it is true David Kay is saying we have not found large stockpiles of actual weapons."
Full story

6 June, 2004, BBC Radio 4 Today programme
"What we also know is we haven't found them [weapons of mass destruction] in Iraq - now let the survey group complete its work and give us the report... They will not report that there was no threat from Saddam, I don't believe."
Full story

6 July, 2004, evidence to Commons Liaison Committee
"I have to accept we haven't found them (WMD) and we may never find them, We don't know what has happened to them. "They could have been removed. They could have been hidden. They could have been destroyed."
Full story

14 July, 2004, statement on the Butler report
"We expected, I expected to find actual usable, chemical or biological weapons after we entered Iraq.
"But I have to accept, as the months have passed, it seems increasingly clear that at the time of invasion, Saddam did not have stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons ready to deploy."
Full story

28 September, 2004, keynote Labour conference speeech
"The evidence about Saddam having actual biological and chemical weapons, as opposed to the capability to develop them, has turned out to be wrong. I acknowledge that and accept it. I simply point out, such evidence was agreed by the whole international community, not least because Saddam had used such weapons against his own people and neighbouring countries.
"And the problem is, I can apologise for the information that turned out to be wrong, but I can't, sincerely at least, apologise for removing Saddam.
"The world is a better place with Saddam in prison not in power."
"I can apologise for the information being wrong but I can never apologise, sincerely at least, for removing Saddam. The world is a better place with Saddam in prison."
Full story

29 September speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme
The prime minister was asked about UN secretary general Kofi Annan's assertion that the war with Iraq was illegal.
"That is his view - it is not our view," Mr Blair said.
"The view we took at the time and we take it now is that the war was justified legally because he [Saddam Hussein] remained in breach of UN resolutions."

Full story

THE WAR CRIMINAL TO HEAD THE EU

2009-10-12T22:17:00.004+11:00

The Scotsman newspaper
9 October 2009

FORMER prime minister Tony Blair was publicly snubbed by a bereaved father yesterday who accused him of having "blood on his hands" for sending troops to fight in Iraq.

Mr Blair, who has repeatedly defended his decision to lead Britain into the conflict, was rebuked by Peter Brierley, whose son, Lance Corporal Shaun Brierley, 28, was killed in 2003.

The clash came at a reception for guests who had attended a commemoration service marking the end of Operation Telic – the Iraq campaign – and honouring the 179 British personnel who died during the six-year conflict.

Mr Brierley refused to shake Mr Blair's outstretched hand at the event staged at the Guildhall in London and told the politician: "I'm not shaking your hand, you've got blood on it."

The former prime minister was ushered away and afterwards Mr Brierley, from Batley, West Yorkshire, said: "I understand soldiers go to war and die but they have to go to war for a good reason and be properly equipped to fight. I believe Tony Blair is a war criminal. I can't bear to be in the same room as him. I can't believe he's been allowed to come to this reception."I believe he's got the blood of my son and all of the other men and women who died out there on his hands."

His son was a 28-year-old radio systems operator with 212 Signal Squadron when he was killed in a road traffic accident in March 2003 in Kuwait while serving in Operation Telic.

Readers’ Comments:
(1)....that he ( Saddam Hussein) has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes -24 Sep 2002
"There are literally thousands of sites. As I was told in Iraq
"As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction." - 4 June 2003
"I don't concede it at all that the intelligence at the time was wrong.
"I have absolutely no doubt at all that we will find evidence of weapons of mass destruction programmes." 8 July 2003
"We expected, I expected to find actual usable, chemical or biological weapons after we entered Iraq. 14 July, 2004
"The evidence about Saddam having actual biological and chemical weapons, as opposed to the capability to develop them, has turned out to be wrong. I acknowledge that and accept it.28 September, 2004
"The view we took at the time and we take it now is that the war was justified legally because he [Saddam Hussein] remained in breach of UN resolutions." 29 September 2004
All by Tony Blair from the BBC - http://tinyurl.com/ygf7nrn

(2)Tony Blair heard some home truths at both the service and the reception commemorating the dead of the Iraq war. Rowan Williams said that both policy makers and commentators warbled on about the looming conflict without really measuring the price that was going to be paid by those involved. He suggested that if those in power were to take any lesson from the build-up to the Iraq war, it was the importance of avoiding exaggerated rhetoric. “Perhaps we have learned something, if only that there is a time to keep silence, a time to let go of the satisfyingly overblown language that is so tempting to human beings when war is in the air." Blair learned something else when Peter Brierley, whose son was killed, refused to shake his hand because his son’s blood was on the hands of the former PM. Of course three Blair’s bodyguards sprang into action, ushering him away from reality. Yet almost 200 British soldiers died between the start of the conflict in March 2003 and the withdrawal of British troops in April this year. Brierley later spoke for all service families such as my own when he said, “The truth is that we went to war on the lies told by Tony Blair about the fictional weapons of mass destruction. He sent our fine men and women to fight without proper transport, kit or arms. And as a result of that decision, I have lost my son whereas Blair has made £14million on the back of taking us to war and they are now talking about making him president of the EU.” EAXCTLY!!!!

(3) Comment by Mohammed A Hegazi:
Tony Blair was not the only war criminal. The war on Iraq involved Cheney, Bush, Blair and an Australian shrimp. They all connived and lied in order to wage a war for oil. They all ignored the voice of the people who moved en-masse in unprecedented numbers in order to show their opposition to the war. Yet, we still have Kevin Rudd in Australia, in a typically Jewish manner, dragging his feet about pulling the last Australian soldier out of Iraq.

WHO IS JAMES TRAFICANT

2009-10-09T10:02:00.006+11:00

The word Traficant has nothing to do with traffic. In order to make a name, it has always been a Jewish tradition to select a common word and mutilate it by adding or deleting a few letters. Putting this aside aside, James or Jim Traficant is a US Jewish ex-senator. Being a bit far-sighted, he could see the damage caused to the US as a result of its one-eyed policies in the Middle East and its unlimited support of Israel’s dangerous expansionist policies that destroyed the economy and standing of the US to a point that is now beyond repair.

Traficant raised the alarm seven years ago, when the so called neo-cons were at the helm, steering the US empire to its inevitable end, which came faster than all expectations. His fellow Jews did not like his attitude at the time, so they quickly fabricated or, to be more exact, exposed some of his practices that are common to most US politicians, and fall into the realm of white-collar crimes. He was sent to prison, which is the popular method for Jews to eliminate their political opponents.

Traficant came out of prison only to emerge far more defiant than before. He found his way to the Jew-controlled media via a Jewish backdoor. In a video clip, which might not last for long on Utube, he is being interviewed by Greta Van Susteren , a Jewess who must be at least 20 years past her “use by date”. Both pretended to be discussing the issue of Israel-US relations in a fair manner, but you can sense the typical Jewish methodology of slipping some poison into the honey. The usual cliché of “ain’t you being anti-Semite?” was thrown at the miserable guest, to which he did not reply by, “But I am a Semite myself.”

While Traficant did raise important true and sincere patriotic issues about the fatal error of supporting Israel, he had to stick to common Jewish fallacies such as:

∙ Israel is the only true ally of the US in the middle East.
∙ Arabs export terrorism to the US, a view that supports the common lies about 911.

Anyway, the clip is really worth watching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0scNGzWfv8A

ONLY IN AMERICA

2009-09-30T23:57:00.029+10:00

Would you believe such American passive ignorance? It can happen only in America, where ignorance prevails among those fat tv-bound dummies.3000 Americans died inside the buildings of the World Trade Center in New York City on 11 September 2001. Forget about the millions killed by Americans or Jews, in the wars that followed in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine. Just think from a pragmatic American angle:

When a patriotic movement demonstrated requesting proper investigation of what happened, only 300 people took part. If 80 thousand people signed a petition demanding a proper investigation, one would expect a sizeable fraction of them to demonstrate on a Sunday. But this did not happen.

I can now understand why Jews controlled America. The reason is such apathy, laziness, ignorance and sheep mentality. I would not be surprised if most of the herd still believed that Osama Bin Laden planned and executed such horrendous crime.Click on the links below and see for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkCos-y-WWM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VptWc4F3wNQ
http://hegazi.blogspot.com/2008/02/911-ultimate-american-deception.html

NYC CAN CANNOT!

2009-09-27T08:43:00.009+10:00

As per previous posts, NYC CAN is a popular movement by more than 80 thousand New York City citizens, not to mention the silent majority they might represnt. The aim of the movement is to investigate the 911 coverup. I totally support the movement, but I also claim myself an expert on matters Jewish. As such, I expect the movement to be totally drowned by the Jews of New York. Below is the latest info release by NYC CAN. I read it differently from many unsuspecting citizens of this world. When I sifted quickly through the lines, I came across the name "Judge Lehner", who is obviously a Jew. Many might say, "So what?". Well, wait and see for yourself. Here is the NYC CAN latest report about their march, which will take place in a few hours:

MARCH FOR ANSWERS

September 27, 2009 2pm Battery Park (State Street) to City Hall

List of Speakers:

Bob McIlvaine - 9/11 Family Member
Manny Badillo - 9/11 Family Member
Daniel Sunjata - Star of FOX's "Rescue Me"
Eileen Coles - 9/11 Survivor and Whistleblower
Major Mike McCormack - 9/11 First Responder
Mark Crispin Miller - Professor of Media Studies at NYU

*Live Feed of March Likely! Check Website Before March!
__________________________________________
Breaking News: Court Referee Recommends Ruling in Favor of City;
NYC CAN To File Motion To Reject Referee's Recommendation
Rather than waiting until the scheduled decision date of Monday, September 28, Referee Louis Crespo issued his "report and recommendations" on Friday, September 25, and recommended that the Court rule in favor of the City.

After reviewing the referee's report, we feel he did not give adequate consideration to the extensive arguments presented in our memorandum of law submitted on Monday, September 21. The report seemed more a cut and paste from the City's original motion papers than a balanced weighing of the arguments. In particular, the referee's report failed to analyze the vast majority of NYC CAN's legal points as to why the City's claims were unfounded and its reliance on certain case law wholly inapplicable.

Officially, Judge Lehner has up to 60 days to either adopt, modify, or reject the referee's report and recommendation, and render a decision. However, with the deadline for inclusion on the ballot fast approaching, NYC CAN lawyers will bring a motion on Monday, September 28 to ask the Court to reconsider the matter immediately, and render a judgment in favor of the Petitioners. We anticipate that the matter will be heard and decided on Tuesday, September 29, or Wednesday, September 30.

Judge Lehner may decide the case on the paperwork submitted, or hear oral arguments as well. If oral arguments are ordered, the proceeding should be open to the public. If so, we will ask everyone who can to attend and help maintain the tidal wave of support that will crescendo with the March For Answers on Sunday.

Only in fighting to the very end will the voices of 80,000 New Yorkers resonate across the country, and those who are still asleep awaken to the mockery of justice in a local government claiming it has no jurisdiction over thousands of its residents being murdered.

The 9/11 Commission Report - a disgrace to any society that considers itself just, democratic and transparent; and a shameless affront to those who died on September 11th - is on its last legs.
Thinkers think and talkers talk. Patriots ACT.

www.NYCCAN.org

NEW YORK CITY DEMANDS PROPER 911 INVESTIGATION

2009-09-24T10:29:00.010+10:00

The following item is a message from NYC CAN requesting celebrities to join a march demanding proper re-investigation of the 911 coverup. Will this endeavour succeed in bringing Cheney and his mafia to justice? Personally, I believe that American democracy is dead, but you never know what could happen if people are united:

MARCH FOR ANSWERS NYC CAN:

An Open Letter to All Celebrities Who Want A New 9/11 Investigation March For Answers September 27, 2009 2pm Battery Park 80,000 New Yorkers have signed a petition to place a referendum for a new 9/11 investigation on this November’s ballot. Over 100 victims’ family members are leading this call, and are joined by dozens of first responders and survivors.

The city government is now attempting to silence the voice of the people by challenging the legality of the petition. NYC CAN, the sponsoring organization, is not backing down, and a legal battle with the City has unfolded. Click to read NYC CAN's legal memo.

In a truly democratic society, this monumental democratic statement and subsequent attempt to silence the voices of 80,000 voters would be widely reported in the media. In our society, such monumental efforts only register if they have the vocal support of people like you.

Now is our chance. This Sunday, September 27 at 2pm, supporters of this historic initiative will march from Battery Park past Ground Zero and the State Supreme Court all the way to the steps of City Hall.

At this critical moment in the pursuit of truth about 9/11, we ask you to join us as we MARCH FOR ANSWERS. Now is the time to stand UP and stand WITH the 80,000 proud New Yorkers who have courageously said YES, we MUST investigate 9/11!

Your single voice can allow for the voices of 80,000 New Yorkers to be heard, which in turn will bring unprecedented legitimacy to your voice when you call for a new 9/11 investigation. Together, we can take a giant step toward justice and accountability.

Please contact NYC CAN at (917) 627-8467 to be a part of this historic march.

Sincerely,
Donna Marsh O’Connor, Mother of Vanessa Lang Langer
Bob McIlvaine, Father of Bobby McIlvaine
Jean Canavan, Sister-in-Law of Sean Canavan
Manny Badillo, Nephew of Thomas Joseph Sgroi
Janette MacKinlay, Survivor.

_________________________________

Meet Bob McIlvaine
Bob's son Bobby was killed on 9/11. Bob knows that his son's death is the pretext for the wars the US government has waged since 9/11. Bob stood by helplessly as the White House official who wrote the Preemptive War strategy, Philip Zelikow, went on to run the 9/11 Commission's investigation into his son's murder. Is it a conflict of interest that the same Bush insider who wrote the policy of Preemptive War also wrote the pretext justifying that policy? Is his word good in your book? Not in Bob's book.

That's why on Sunday, September 27 Bob will march alongside the 80,000 New Yorkers who have called for a new 9/11 investigation; one that will NOT be run by those who advocate wars. He hopes you will too.

JEWS WAGING BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ON AMERICA AND THE WORLD

2009-09-20T09:35:00.005+10:00

The article below sheds much light on the manufactured pandemic scare waged from time to time in the form of red herrings such as swine flu, bird flu and the like:

Len Horowitz - Pandemic Charges Filed With FBI In NYC
Attorney Harold H. Burbank, II

Friends,
The substance of the message below on a false flag h1n1 flu pandemic has been widely discussed on the net for months, but the message indicates the first serious US legal action I have seen on it. I have with the help of many been tracking this issue as it affects states and localities, anticipating the need to file injunction lawsuits v. any government taking steps to compel vaccination. It is presumed by Dr. Horowitz and others that government will attempt to compel vaccination v. h1n1, which is not possible under current law, especially US Constitution and state constitution law for many First Amendment and related privacy and civil rights reasons. I offer the message as a warning as to how serious the talks, research and some of the proposed h1n1 policy state laws under consideration opposing civil rights, especially in ME, MA and OK, have become.

Having read of lawsuits filed against h1n1 in Europe for reasons indicated in the below article, I am convinced that there is considerable reason not to take any new so called h1n1 vaccine, and to prepare for simlilar suits in the US, which I am prepared to do.

To lawyers receiving this message, I welcome your comments on how to prepare clients and friends to defend against unconstitutional h1n1 legislation and acts, and any common effort we might begin in the US.

Harold Burbank
2008 CT Green Party candidate, US House
Release: No. H1N1-15
Date Mailed: Sept. 15, 2009
For Immediate Release
Contact: Rob Potter--(959) 715-1520 or 310-877-5002

LOS ANGELES, CA -- Drug-industry investigators have uncovered documents exposing an international drug ring, operating from New York City, is behind the H1N1 swine flu fright and vaccination preparations.

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane, an investigative journalist, have released evidence in legal affidavits that leaders of a private global biotechnology "trust" are behind the pandemic flu, including its origin and alleged prevention via vaccinations. Their documents, being sent by attorneys to the FBI this week, evidence industrialists are operating a crime ring within the "Partnership for New York City" (PNYC), and are behind the pandemic's creation, media persuasions, vaccination preparations, and health official promotions.

"David Rockefeller's trust, that engages several powerful partners on Wall Street, including media moguls Ruppert Murdock, Morton Zuckerman, Thomas Glocer, and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Jerry Speyer, are implicated in advancing global genocide," Dr. Horowitz wrote to FBI directors.

"This 'partnership' controls biotechnology research and development globally. Health commerce internationally is also controlled virtually entirely by this trust that also exercises near complete control over mainstream media to promote/propagandize its products and services for the drug cartel's organized crime. This trust, in essence, makes or breaks medical and natural healing markets, primarily through the mass media companies and propaganda it wields for social engineering and market building," Dr. Horowitz wrote.

Among the revelations from the Horowitz-Kane research are those linking Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, Inc., and the 9-11 terrorist attacks, to the drug cartel's geopolitical, economic, and population reduction activities. Mr. Silverstein, leaser of the World Trade Center who authorized to have Building-7 "pulled" [detonated] is a chief suspect in the "9-11 truth" investigation. Silverstein is currently landlord and co-partner in the biotechnology trust founded by David Rockefeller and implicated by these new discoveries.

Given the unprecedented nature and urgency of these findings, Dr. Horowitz has posted his affidavit for public review on FLUscam.com, hoping wide spread dissemination will prompt governments worldwide to cease mass vaccination preparations to avoid becoming accessories.

"The last time I contacted the FBI I warned them about the impending anthrax attacks one week before the first mailings were announced in the press," Dr. Horowitz recalled. "It took them 6 months to respond. When they did, they made me a suspect in the mailings. This time I am warning the Justice Department a month before the deadliest genocide in history. I'm praying they'll take kindly to my appeal for a PNYC investigation, and Court-ordered injunction, to stop the vaccinations for public protection."
-End-

Attorney Harold H. Burbank, II
84 N. Mountain Rd.
Canton, CT 06019
860.693.2687
email haroldburbank@comcast.net

FRAUDULENT TALMUDIC CITY CLERK DEFEATED

2009-09-14T22:44:00.004+10:00

A fraudulent city clerk tried to obstruct a petition by thousands of New York City residents to have the crime of 911 properly investigated. When the legal noose was tightened around his neck, his lawyer admitted that his client was in error. Thus paving the way for the next stage in the legal battle against NY CITY's Zionist Jews. Below is the full story as related on the website of NYC CAN:

City of New York Concedes 9/11 Coalition Has 30,000 Valid Signatures To Put Referendum For 9/11 Investigation on November Ballot

New York – In a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors, indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures to put the referendum for a new 9/11 investigation before the voters of New York City this November.
In an earlier letter from the City Clerk dated July 24, 2009, the City had claimed only 26,003 signatures were valid, 3,997 short of the requisite 30,000. The City’s concession that over 30,000 of the 52,000 signatures submitted were in fact valid paves the way for lawyers from both sides to argue the legality of petition.
Asked whether he thought NYC CAN could overcome the City’s challenge to the legality of the petition, legal counsel to the petitioners, Dennis McMahon, said, “Absolutely. Although the City has an incredibly successful record of shooting down ballot initiatives, we will be arguing from a fresh perspective that reflects the unprecedented events of 9/11. We believe the courts will see how critical an issue this is, and be persuaded with our legal reasoning and point of view.” A final determination on the legality of the petition will be reached in time for the referendum to be included on the November ballot should the petitioners prevail.
Representatives for NYC CAN, 9/11 family member Manny Badillo and Executive Director Ted Walter, arrived at the Board of Elections on the morning of Wednesday, September 9, to assist the court-appointed referee in commencing a line-by-line review of the disputed signatures, only to learn the referee’s review had been called off due to a last minute concession by the City. Mr. Badillo immediately got on the phone to inform others of the news.
“The City conceded we have 30,000 valid signatures. Big victory.”
The City’s concession comes as a result of the immense effort put forth by 50+ volunteers who gave more than 1,000 hours over a two week period from August 10 to August 25 to identify a total of 7,166 signatures that were wrongly invalidated by the NYC City Clerk and Board of Elections. On August 27, NYC CAN filed the 631-page Bill of Particulars cataloguing each of the 7,166 signatures it contended were in fact valid. NYC CAN submitted another 28,000 signatures on September 4 to guarantee the referendum will go on the ballot if they win the court case, bringing the total signatures submitted to 80,000.
631-page Bill of Particulars Filed on August 27
NYC CAN must deliver its memorandum of law in response to the City’s motion for summary judgment by Monday, September 21. The City will be given an opportunity to reply before the referee’s decision is made on Monday September 28. Fast-track appeals will likely follow no matter who wins. A final decision will have to be made by September 30.
If the referendum passes in November, it would lead to the creation of a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks.
http://www.nyccan.org/

Further Comment by M A Hegazi:

This battle between the Jews of New York City and the rest of the city’s decent citizens is indeed significant and crucial. It is symbolic of a raging large scale battle between the citizens of the United States of America and the Jewish minority that highjacked the country. This evil treacherous minority controls the White House, Congress, the Senate and every government department. It is the same minority that dragged America into barbaric wars and gave America the ugly image it has today.

This battle is indeed crucial and of utmost importance, but you will never hear about it in the Jew-controlled mass media. You might hear about rabbis trading in human organs on the black market, but you will never hear about Jews fighting for the coverup of the 911 Zionist crime.

So, please spread the news and follow the fast developments from here to November 2009. More importantly, please donate to this significant and worthy cause. The legal and other cost are hefty. Personally, I am not optimistic because I know how strong is the grip of those evil Jews over public life wherever they existed. I do know that Jews are never loyal to their countries of birth, citizenship or livelihood. Jews are loyal only to their Jewishness and the state of Israel as a symbol of their unworthy existence. However, I do wish the patriotic group NYC CAN success in their battle against the Jews of New York.

WHO ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS?

2009-09-12T14:06:00.014+10:00

Throw this question at the average American simpleton and you would get his spontaneous emphatic reply:

The terrorists are those evil Moslems and Arabs.

Why do you get such erroneous absurd reply?

It is because of the continual bombardment of these simple unsophisticated minds by the evil Jewish mass media. In reality, all those Moslems and Arabs that you see wandering in their funny cumbersome garb are simple people who harbour no evil feelings towards others. They are too busy trying to understand the vague metaphoric nuances of their own benign mysterious religion.When extremist Jews or Christians discuss Islam, they pick on the harsh metaphoric stance Moslems are instructed to take against their enemies, when the latter mount a war against them.

As such, media Jews have depicted Moslems as untrustworthy blood-thirsty people. You would find similar harsh statements in the old and new testaments, if you look hard enough, not to mention the evil Talmud, which is an indictment of its own followers.

But who are the real terrorists?

They are those American, British and European Jews who are running the affairs of the US, UK and most of Europe. They are those power-hungry quasi-human beings who mounted devastating wars on innocent people, after advancing fabricated pretexts for war.

After almost a decade since the MOSSAD-CIA-CHENEY gang planned and executed the tragedy of 911, many simple-minded people in this world do still believe that the cave-dweller Osama Bin Laden was the culprit. It is a shame that only about 70 thousand inhabitants of New York are taking legal action to have 911 properly investigated, while all informed people can find the truth about 911 via a simple push of a computer button. Here is one Internet link of hundreds, if not thousands of links that offer you indelible proof that the US government has been, and still is, involved in a massive coverup of the crime of 911.

Why the coverup?

If the crime of 911 is exposed, so would be the crimes of the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. It is that simple. This is why Obama would never have the guts to re-examine 911, regardless of the striking facts that require re-investigation.

HOLOHOAXING IN GAZA

2009-09-02T08:26:00.005+10:00

They missed their Holohoax class!

VICTIMS OF ISRAELI GENOCIDE OUTRAGED
Hamas slams UN attempt to teach Jewish pseudo-history

'Holocaust classes' in Gaza!
By NIDAL al-MUGHRABI
Reuters Sunday, 30 August 2009 GAZA, Palestine

Hamas condemned the United Nations Sunday, saying it planned to teach Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip about the Holocaust® — but the UN agency which runs schools in the enclave would not confirm any change.

Branding the [alleged] Nazi genocide of the Jews "a lie invented by the Zionists," the Islamist movement which runs the Gaza Strip wrote in an open letter to a senior UN official that he should withdraw plans for a new history book in UN schools.

A spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which educates some 200,000 refugee children in Gaza, said the Holocaust® was not on its current curriculum. He would not comment on Hamas's statement that it was about to change.

'We refuse to let our children study a lie'

Palestinians resent the way world powers reacted to the Holocaust® by supporting the establishment of Israel in 1948, a move that left half the Arab population of then British-ruled Palestine as refugees in Gaza, the West Bank and abroad.

Hamas said it believed UNRWA was about to start using a text for 13-year-olds that included a chapter on the Holocaust®.

In an open letter to local UNRWA chief John Ging, the movement's Popular Committees for Refugees said: "We refuse to let our children study a lie invented by the Zionists."

UNRWA spokesman Adnan Abu Hasna said: "There is no mention of the Holocaust® in the current syllabus." Asked if UNRWA planned to change that, he declined to comment.

Israelis upset

In the Israeli-occupied West Bank, run by the Western-backed Palestinian Authority of President Mahmoud Abbas, teachers said there was no official guidance on teaching about the Holocaust®.

Israelis are angered by denial of the Holocaust® among some in the Middle East, notably lately by leaders in Iran, who provide support for Hamas. Abbas, who has engaged in negotiation with Israel, has had to distance himself from his own 1980s doctoral thesis, which cast doubt on the scale of the Holocaust®.

Hamas's official spokesman in Gaza, Sami Abu Zuhri, said he did not want to discuss the history of the Holocaust® but said: "Regardless of the controversy, we oppose forcing the issue of the so-called Holocaust® onto the syllabus, because it aims to reinforce acceptance of the occupation of Palestinian land."
-------------------------------------------------http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE57T1JW20090830 Continuing the fight for a better world —NEW ORDERDept EPO Box 270486Milwaukee WI 53227

THE TOBEN CASE: WELCOME TO TALMUDISTAN

2009-08-16T02:07:00.019+10:00

(Photo by: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org)

I went to Adelaide in order to attend the final kangaroo court hearing that dispatched Dr Fredrick toben to prison. Toben was appealing against the decision by a lower court judge to impose on him a three-month jail term for an alleged “contempt of court” offence. The reason given for the allegation was that on numerous occasions Toben did not believe the allegation that Germans gassed jews in the fourties of the twentieth century. The said judge ordered Toben not to insult jews who believed in the Holocaust myth, and to stop “vilifying” them by believing and asserting that those deluded individuals were “of limited intelligence”, an assertion with which many, including my humble self, would totally agree. People do not need to be of super intelligence in order to be able to see that the so called “Jewish Holocaust” was a total fabrication.

Jews in Germany were among many other groups accused of being “enemies of the state”. They were arrested and sent to concentration camps to be used as forced labour for the German war effort during WW2. There is not a shred of real or logical evidence that any Jew had been deliberately killed. The conditions in the camps might have been bad, the food rations might have been inadequate, but the allegation that Jews were mass-killed is totally absurd. Some workers died because of infectious typhus, a disease transmitted by body lice. The corpses of the dead had to be burnt in order to stop the spread of the epidemic. The claim that six million Jews were executed is a blatant lie propagated by demented individuals who survived the war.

Anyway, I delved into the “Adelaide High Court” where a “full court” of three judges sat on the bench. As the hearing progressed, I could clearly see that the judges had made up their minds before walking into the room. As the formalities continued, David Perkins, the defence counsel, opened for the three judges every possible avenue that would have enabled them to reach a sensible decision. He tried to make them understand that the “Anti Discrimination Act” should not override the constitutional right to free speech, but they shunned him and insisted that the whole matter was an ordinary run-of-the-mill simple case of contempt of court that had nothing to do with the Holocaust.

As the legal theatrics progressed, the outcome became apparent to me. Hiding behind this flimsy façade of “contempt of court”, the presiding judge began to read the justification for the forthcoming sentence. My stomach could not take such nonsense. I stood up in protest and walked out of the courtroom before the sentence was announced. At the door of the courtroom, I turned around to face the judges and gave a respectful bow, which is a custom in court procedures. It shows respect for the law, but not necessarily for the judges who failed it.

As I waited outside the door of the courtroom, I reflected sadly on my last forty years as an Australian citizen. Is this really the free country I loved so dearly? Will it continue to be my refuge from the ugly totalitarian system I left back at my birthplace Egypt?

My colleague, the brave fearless Fredrick Toben, walked out a few minutes after. We exchanged a reassuring look and, together with Peter Hartung and several other supporters, walked for a few metres in the direction of a number of Federal Police agents, who were shyly ready to carry out the instructions they previously received. Fredrick bid us goodbye and walked to them with a friendly smile saying, ”Here I am, I am ready and I have nothing to carry with me.” Minutes later, I met David Perkins who, almost talking to himself, remarked, “They gave us no chance!”

Unlike the programmed robots I have seen on the day, David struck me as a very decent strong believer in and advocate of free speech. He probably believed that the law of the land and its custodians would never transform Australia into a member of the Talmudic group of nations. I believe that, on 13 August 2009, he faced his day of reckoning.

NEW YORK CITY CAN'T

2009-08-03T13:52:00.030+10:00

NYC CAN Plaintiffs Take City to Court
July 31, 2009

9/11 Family Members, and Survivor File for Re-validation of Citizens’ Signatures with New York State Supreme Court, following rejection of NYC CAN petition by the City Clerk and Board of Elections

New York City– On Wednesday, several 9/11 victim family members and a survivor took the first step in challenging the City Clerk’s rejection of the NYC CAN petition for a new investigation in New York City. The group filed a Verified Petition/Order to Show Cause with the Supreme Court of the State of New York requesting a review of Board of Election documentation and a ‘special referee’ appointed to re-validate the over 52,000 signatures filed by NYC CAN on June 24th.

The NYC CAN petition was rejected by the City Clerk on Friday, July 24th, a week ago, certifying less than the minimum of 30,000 qualified signatures of electors. This benchmark, according to the Clerk’s office was not met. A ‘qualified elector’ is a registered New York City voter who was eligible to vote in the last election. According to the letter sent by the Clerk to the City Council, the NY Board of Elections validated 26,003 signatures and invalidated 24,664, leaving 1,333 that were not certified.

At a hearing scheduled for Monday, August 3rd, before a Supreme Court Justice, the plaintiffs, representing tens of thousands of concerned New Yorkers who support a new 9/11 investigation, will formally raise their request for an independent review of the Board of Elections findings. If granted by the presiding Justice, a re-validation of the petition signatures by an independent special referee will follow.

In addition to the requirement to reach the threshold of 30,000 qualified electors, the petition itself must comply with New York Municipal Home Rule Law and relevant Election Laws. The City Clerk maintains the Petition fell short in several areas but it should be emphasized that this is the legal opinion of the Corporation Counsel, the City of New York’s top lawyer, and will be challenged in court by lawyers for the five plaintiffs.

Legal advisors to the plaintiffs believe that the legal objections raised by the Corporation Counsel are specious and should be set aside, however considering the political implications and official opposition to the proposed Commission, obtaining approval for placing the referendum question on the ballot itself will be fraught with difficulty and challenge each step of the way.

The fact is historically in New York City, ballot initiatives have not been successful. The last two were denied by the City Clerk. In both cases the petitioners filed a suit and ultimately lost and thus NYC CAN anticipated the response of the Clerk. And though the odds are stacked against us, we are committed to take the next steps available to us.

Regardless of the outcome, the court case will serve to amplify the demand for a new 9/11 investigation and with lessons learned, should serve to strengthen the ability of the people to petition their government for meaningful referendums in the future.

Please donate to this historic court case now:Go to –

http://nyccan.org/donate.php
------------------------------------------------------
NYC CAN is non-partisan organization comprised of 9/11 Families, First Responders, Survivors and proud, concerned citizens committed to bringing about an independent, impartial investigation into the events of September 11.
------------------------------------------------------

Comment by Mohammed A Hegazi

"New York City Can" might eventually prove that New York City Can't. In a quasi democracy with a two-party system, fanatic Jews reign.

What America needs now is a revolution to destroy the rotten system and build a new one. American democracy is now totally and comprehensively dead. America is in need of “regime change” and “creative anarchy”.

NYCCAN has my moral and financial support, but I know very well who owns and runs America, so did THE WAR CRIMINAL ARIEL SHARON before me, when he said, “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

FIGHT THE TALMUDIC CITY CLERK

2009-07-31T02:36:00.011+10:00

A CALL TO ACTION – FORWARD WIDELY
　
http://www.nyccan.org/
July 27, 2009

9/11 FAMILIES, FIRST RESPONDERS AND SURVIVORS TO TAKE NEW YORK CITY TO COURT OVER NYC CAN PETITION

SEVENTY THOUSAND New Yorkers signed the NYC CAN petition, raising their voices in support of NYC CAN’s demand for accountability. They have chosen to place the decision to create a new 9/11 investigation – a REAL 9/11 investigation – exactly where it belongs: before the voters of New York City this November.

The voices of SEVENTY THOUSAND Americans who believe in democracy and believe that government exists to serve the people – and not the other way around – have been GAGGED by ONE so-called “PUBLIC SERVANT” – The New York City Clerk – who denied the petition and the voice of the people.

Welcome to America. Democracy denied.

Did you REALLY expect those in halls of power to honor the WILL OF THE PEOPLE? Did you expect this demand for accountability to go uncontested by those who have forgotten the very meaning of the word? Perhaps this obstruction of democracy would go unchallenged in THEIR America. Not in OUR America.

9/11 family members, first responders and survivors expected nothing less than business as usual and ARE NOT HAVING IT. They are preparing to take the City of New York to court to challenge the wrongful denial of our right to decide on the creation of a new 9/11 investigation.

Friends, your determination and generosity have brought us to this crucial moment. TRUTH IS AT THE CROSSROADS, DEMOCRACY UNDER FIRE AND THE DEFINING MOMENT IN THE QUEST FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IS UPON US. This is YOUR movement and nothing may bring you closer to attaining truth than NYC CAN. Stand in the light and demand ANSWERS, not in the shadows of those who would deny you such answers.

THE BIG NEWS: the most experienced election lawyer in New York City stands ready to represent the 9/11 families, first responders and survivors in court in an HISTORIC FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY AND TRUTH. BUT WE DESPERATELY NEED YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. This is your chance – your ONE chance – to stand with the 9/11 families, first responders and survivors, and demand accountability. THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE WORKED FOR, AND WHAT WE CAN ACHIEVE IF WE STAND TOGETHER NOW.

Donate over $25 and we’ll mail you a free NYC CAN button. Donate over $50 and you will receive a free NYC CAN button and a well-made NYC CAN t-shirt.
ACT RIGHT NOW. Go to – http://nyccan.org/donate.php – and donate whatever you can to bring the quest for answers to the biggest stage it has ever had: THE NEW YORK CITY BALLOT.
　
http://www.nyccan.org/
　
　　
"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” Theodore Parker

Comment by Mohammed A Hegazi:

You don't have to be a a New Yorker to donate. You don't even have to be American to help the American people restore their lost freedom and democracy. If the people of New York cannot defeat one fanatic Shylock, New York's City Clerk, then America and the world will be defeated by fanatic Jews.

Please help yourself and the world. Purge humanity of the Talmudic curse. DONATE FOR THIS CRUCIAL ENDEAVOUR.

VIOLATING TALMUDIC LAW

2009-07-30T23:37:00.008+10:00

Jewish leader declares son 'dead'

for squealing in New Jersey scandal

By KATE SHEEHY

New York Post

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

A lot of people might like to wring his neck, but the sleazy real-estate mogul who ratted out everyone from politicians to rabbis in a massive corruption case is apparently already as good as dead to his father.

Israel Dwek — the father of Solomon "Shlomo" Dwek, who helped the feds nail three New Jersey mayors and several rabbis in Brooklyn last week — plans to sit shiva for his son because he is so disgusted with his turning on other Jews, reported the Web site PolitickerNJ.com.

Shiva is the traditional Jewish mourning period held after a family member dies.

Cites Talmudic law
The father — citing "the Talmudic Law of Moses that prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew" — renounced his son from the pulpit at his synagogue in Deal, NJ, on Saturday, the site said.

Israel Dwek is a revered leader of the Sephardic Jewish community in the wealthy enclave. His son, 36, surfaced as the feds' pointman in a widespread probe that brought down 44 people.

Solomon Dwek turned informant after being busted himself in 2006 for trying to rip off $50 million from PNC Bank in a check-kiting scheme. He helped set up stings for the FBI and IRS initially to help expose international money-laundering by rabbis in Brooklyn and Jersey, authorities said.

'Matchmaker' for human organs
During the course of the investigation, he also led the feds to a Brooklyn rabbi, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, who allegedly boasted that he had been helping to peddle human organs on the black market for a decade.

On tapes, Rosenbaum allegedly refers to himself as a "matchmaker" who could find an Israeli donor for a "schmear," or money — specifically willing to trade a kidney for $160,000. Others nailed by Solomon Dwek's undercover work include the mayors of Hoboken, Secaucus and Ridgefield, as well as the Jersey City council president.

Hoboken Mayor Peter Cammarano was caught on tape bragging, "I could be indicted and still get 85 to 95 percent of the vote," according to officials. Last night, opponents calling for his resignation rallied at City Hall.

Released on $10-million bond
Dwek has been released on $10-million bond in his own swindle case, which is still pending. Because of his family's prominence in the Jewish community, he was considered the perfect "in" into what is typically a very insular world, officials have said.

Dwek "would meet them in parking lots, in luncheonettes, diners, offices, basement boiler rooms and bathrooms, and the politicians willingly put themselves up for sale," said New Jersey acting US Attorney Ralph Marra.

HOLOHOAX SEASON IN BRITAIN

2009-07-14T10:41:00.001+10:00

British schools to prepare for
intensified Holocaust® indoctrination

300 schools to become Holocaust® specialists
HISTORY: All secondary schools to have Holocaust® expert
£1.5m national program to train teacher from every secondary school in England*

By ADI BLOOM
The TES Friday, 10 July 2009

LONDON — Hundreds of schools across the country are to become specialist centers of Holocaust® education under a national scheme launched today. The plan, which will be rolled out in 300 schools, forms part of the new £1.5-million ($2.4-million) Holocaust® education program run by London University’s Institute of Education.

As The TES revealed in November, the Holocaust Education Development Program will provide extensive specialist training for 3,500 teachers — one from every secondary in England.

The first cohort of 150 will attend a one-day workshop in London at the beginning of November and a second workshop three weeks later. This will be followed by similar sessions in Liverpool. The training will then be introduced across the country over the next two years.

Masters degree in Holo 'education'
From these teachers, 300 will be able to follow up their training with a masters degree module in Holocaust® education. Their schools will then become designated beacons of excellence in the subject.

The masters module, which will be delivered online, will be free to participating teachers. The cost will be covered jointly by the Pears Foundation and the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

Stuart Foster, director of the program, said: “Professional development can be quite short-lived. We want it to be a continuous process rather than people going away and forgetting about it.”

The specialist teachers will co-ordinate Holocaust® education in their schools. Often, the subject is discussed during history, English, RE and citizenship, but with little collaboration between staff. “Are those teachers working together?” Dr. Foster said. “Is there a sense of collaboration in schools? Often, planning is a little bit arbitrary. We want schools to think about how they organize their curriculum.”

New teaching materials
The Holocaust® specialists will also pilot new teaching materials and provide feedback and suggestions for improvement. Eventually, they will work with local authorities, bringing coordinated Holocaust® education into all local schools. They will also liaise with teachers across the country as part of an online network supporting the national training program.

Paul Salmons, the program’s head of curriculum and development, said: “One of the greatest assets of the program will be this pool of teachers with classroom expertise, ideas and knowledge. They will really immerse themselves in cutting-edge research into Holocaust® history and education.”

At present the Holocaust forms a compulsory part of the national curriculum, but teachers often find it a difficult subject to teach effectively. “You’re talking about mass murder — some of the worst atrocities humans are capable of,” Mr. Salmons said. “That can be very disorientating and distressing for young people. We’re looking at how to move them, without traumatizing them.

'Want to encourage deep reflection'
“Teachers want to encourage deep reflection about the Holocaust®, but not revulsion, horror and disgust. The key is to enhance learning, not to shock.”

Judith Vandervelde, an educator at the Jewish Museum in London, agrees that there is an urgent need for effective methods of teaching about the Holocaust® in schools. “The understanding that pupils get through face-to-face interaction with Holocaust® survivors is quite incredible,” she said. “But they’re not going to be here forever. “We have to look into how we’re going to continue to have that connection
without survivors speaking to pupils. We need to look ahead a few years and make Holocaust® education tangible and accessible.”

http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6017262

* Under this Judeocentric program the suffering, death and extermination of tens of millions of non-Jews is to be ignored as a mere "detail of history."

THE ULTIMATE HOLOCAUST PROOF*

2009-07-11T12:58:00.009+10:00

The dormitories at Auschwitz

WHILE Adelaide's "revisionist historian" Dr Fredrick Toben battles to deny the Holocaust, ANDREW HOLMAN visits Auschwitz-Birkenau and presents the reality:

THE thunder does not rumble over Auschwitz. It roars. Angrily. Like a visitation from the ghosts of history. The air, the ground, the leaves on the trees shake, eerily and in unison. Then it is quiet and still. Until the next violent clap.

A small white fragment reflects from the ground in the fading light. "A bone", says our guide. "The white pieces in the dirt are not stones, they're bits of bones."

You move your feet quickly, trying not to step on the remnants of people's remains. You glance at a small pond and see the reflection of your face. Then your guide says the pond is lined with the ashes of men, women and children who never stood a chance in the Nazi killing machine.

You move again. You notice the dust and ashes on your shoes. You try to shake it off. Everywhere you look, the skeletons of death remain. The thunder roars again but the rain does not come.

The wind blows and you can hear six million voices screaming in your ears, “I never wanted to die, the sun is shining, the flowers are in full bloom casting their bright colours across the blue sky outside the walls of the camp.” You look around you in disbelief. Everything seems so quiet, but you can still hear the faint gasping of all the women and children inside the sixty hundred thousand gas chambers. All of a sudden, you can hear the loud screaming of the guards, “We are running out of gas … we are running out of gas.”

* Please note that the part in black is a cut-and-paste job from an Adelaide newspaper, while the addendum in red is only an improvisation by M A Hegazi, in order to help the writer with his ingenious historic proof that the Holohoax did take place outside the memories and fancies of demented liars.

MUBARAK OF EGYPT COMMITS HIGH TREASON

2009-07-07T17:45:00.007+10:00

Israeli sub enters Suez Canal
DEBKAfile / Special Report Friday, 3 July 2009

TEL AVIV — The Dolphin-class attack submarine is reported to be
the first Israeli naval vessel to transit the Suez Canal in four years on its way from Haifa to Eilat last month.

According to DEBKAfile's military sources, the move indicates a
strengthening of the informal Israel-Egyptian-Saudi pact forged in
recent months against Iran and first revealed by our sources. The three Middle East nations have opted for an Iran policy which is separate from the track pursued by US president Barack Obama.

According to foreign military sources, the Israeli Dolphins are stationed in the Mediterranean, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean opposite Iran's shores. They are said to be armed with torpedo tubes capable of launching nuclear-capable cruise missiles.

OK by Cairo

To transit the Suez Canal, the armed submarine would have required Egyptian permission at the highest level, possibly even President Hosni Mubarak. An official in Cairo told Reuters that its passage would not be problematic as Egypt and Israel are not at war.

This noncommittal response indicates that Egypt has no objection to Israeli military craft passing through the canal on their way to the Red Sea and on to the Persian Gulf in case of a decision to strike Iran. The alternative would be a voyage of weeks around the Horn of Africa.

Our military sources report that since the Israel Navy lost the Dakar submarine near Greece in 1968, all Israeli subs are armed when they move out of harbor. Disclosure of the Israeli sub's passage through the Suez Canal last month is rated by our sources as of high regional significance, over and above the Middle East diplomatic moves afoot.Left: Isaac Rabin; right: The Imbecile-in-Charge of Egypt

====================================
Comment by M A Hegazi

The treachery of the Saudi ruling family has been common knowledge since the US aggression on Iraq and the subsequent occupation. The incompetent Egyptian dictator played a more subtle role, until the time of the Gaza holocaust, when he was stripped of the fig leaf.

Collusion with the Israelis in a possible ill-fated venture against Iran is the ultimate treason. This mad senile dictator deserves a bullet in the head. I am certain that a young Egyptian army zealot would soon finish him off. He crossed all the red lines in his collaboration with Egypt's enemies

I cannot find English adjectives strong enough to describe Hosny Mubarak. Therefore, I can only do him justice in Arabic by calling him "khawal ibn sharmootah".

HAS OBAMA BEEN TRAPPED BY HIS ZIONIST ADVISERS?

2009-06-28T15:14:00.016+10:00

The Wall Street Journal joined the rest of the Zionist spin media drumming up US campaign against peaceful Iran. On Sept. 20, 2002, it echoed the voice of doom and had the arch-Zionist Benjamin Netanyaho beat the drum for preventive strike, such that Americans would not wake up to “a mushroom cloud over an American city”.

The sneaky evil Zionist once said during the period of preparation for the assault on Iraq :

“This is a dictator who is … feverishly trying to acquire nuclear weapons.”

"Saddam’s nuclear program has changed. He no longer needs one large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country — and Iraq is a very big country. Even free and unfettered inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites of mass death.”

“ If action is not taken now, we will all be threatened by a much greater peril … no gas mask and no vaccine can protect against nuclear weapons.”

This kind of false diatribe gushed in abundance out of many other Zionist dirty mouths, such as that of Richard Perle and all the Zionists surrounding the clumsy occupant of the White House at the time.

Perle produced a man of the name “Kadir Hamza”, who was claimed to be and introduced as “Saddam’s Bomb Maker”. Hamza said, “After the Osirak reactor was destroyed by Israel in 1981, Saddam began to build uranium enrichment facilities, many facilities, and we built 400 of them, and they’re all over the country. Some of them look like farmhouses, some of them look like classrooms, some of them look like warehouses. You’ll never find them. They don’t turn out much, but every day they turn out a little bit of nuclear materials.” According to this manufactured evidence, Perle warned, “It’s simply a matter of time before he acquires nuclear weapons.”

Gullible Americans swallowed this nonsense and the Zionist war mongers had it their way. America waged an unjustifiable criminal war against a nation that had no intention to do America any harm whatsoever. America occupied Iraq, killed its people and claimed to have achieved the noble ideal of "democracy and freedom" for the people of Iraq!

To commit such war crime in Iraq is unforgivable. However, the Zionist criminals are working hard in order to get America to commit the same crime in Iran. They are repeating the same tactics with no significant improvisation. They know that average Americans not only do have bird brains, but they also have fish memories.

Obama may just have committed himself to take the same stupid course of action against Iran that his half-brained predecessor took against Iraq. He agreed to a December deadline for progress in talks with Iran, in return for an empty promise by Netanyaho to merely sit with the Palestinians, but not to stop usurping the little left of their country. Obama would not dare make a mention of Israel's 200 or so nuclear warheads. After all, Israel is claimed to be the only "ally" of the US in the Mid-East. If the talks with Iran are not fruitful by then, America will escalate its rhetoric and possibly attack Iran. Such unwarranted aggression has been declared by Obama as an open option when he said, “I’ve been very clear that I don’t take any options off the table with respect to Iran.”

Obama has thus given the green light to Israel, and its American surrogates, to provoke collision with Iran within the next six months until December. The Government of Iran are a group of cool-headed bunch of true representatives of their people. They will continue exactly on the same path. Under the shrewd leadership of Ahmadinejad, there will be no room for error or compromise. No foreign country will dictate to Iran. You can sense this resolve in the way they reacted to the UK embassy in Tehran. The embassy covertly acted to foment public unrest in the aftermath of the recent decisively clean elections.

The false claims against Iraq are now being reiterated against Iran. The same provocative actions are underway. Israel continually threatens Iran via cross-border attacks from Kurdistan. Israel has been practising bombing runs to Greece and Gibraltar, which are equidistant to Tehran. Iran is not passively watching. It has improved its long-range missile system, both in quality and, much more importantly, in quantity.

Israel claims Iran is trucking weapons into Gaza via Sudan. The claim is ridiculous. For these weapons to reach destination, they have to pass through Egypt, cross the Red Sea and Sinai, then pass through Israeli and Egyptian checkpoints. Knowing that the inept Egyptian dictator is essentially a Zionist agent, such mission becomes impossible. This is not to detract from the fact that Iran has the right to help the Palestinians in any manner they see fit.

Hillary Clinton is Zionist to the core. She never missed a chance to glorify Jewish stealing of Palestine. However, since she aspired to become vice president, she has tempered her tone a little. She called an Iranian nuclear capability an “extraordinary threat” and said the U.S. goal is “to persuade the Iranian regime that they will actually be less secure if they proceed with their nuclear weapons program.” Her forked tongue does not answer the basic question: What nuclear weapons program?

According to the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 , American intelligence reports state that Iran halted its weapons program in 2003. There are no reports of the diversion of Iran’s industrial-grade uranium from Natanz or evidence of any secret centrifuge cascade to enrich it to weapons grade. This is reminiscent of Scott Ritter’s reports about Iraq and his repeated declarations that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

The final conclusion is that Iran represents no threat to the United States that would justify a war. However, if you are a US president surrounding yourself with a carefully selected bunch of rabid Zionists, any mad decisions are likely to eventuate. Barack Obama should learn that the crowd manipulating him into war with Iran, especially his vice Joe Biden, has the interest of Zionist Israel in mind. Unluckily, such twisted interest is neither the true interest of the United States nor that of humanity at large.

IS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY FOR REAL?

2009-06-27T00:55:00.005+10:00

"New York City voters have the power to legally mandate the formation of a new investigation with subpoena power by petitioning to place a referendum on the ballot in the November 2009 General Election. In September 2008, the petition reached a milestone of 30,000 signatures, the minimum number required to submit the petition to New York City Council for its approval. By June 2009, NYCCAN will eclipse the 45,000 signatures required to bypass City Council, ensuring its placement on the ballot. With the passage of this referendum New York City will take the first giant step towards truth and justice. "

The above extract appears on the site of "NYC Coalition For Accountability Now".

Is this for real?

In other words, will American quasi democracy repair itself?

Are we going to see the likes of Cheney and Bush behind bars?

Will the world know that 911 was an inside job by a gang of Zionists in the administration?

I find it too hard to believe.

November 2009 is not too far away. We will wait and see.

P. S.:

From: Ted Walter, NYCCAN
On Wednesday, June 24, 2009, we filed the petition with 52,000 signatures. 9/11 Family Members Maureen Hunt and Manny Badillo, and First Responders Charlie Giles of the Feal Good Foundation and Bill Gleason of the World Trade Center Rescuers Foundation, arrived at the City Clerk’s office to deliver the petition and speak on behalf of all the proud and concerned citizens who deserve an unbiased, nonpolitical investigation of the tragedy that has affected us so deeply.

Thank you for getting us this far. City Council now has until August 24 to approve the placement of the referendum on the November 3 ballot. As hundreds more family members, first responders and survivors join our campaign and lobby their council members to support the petition, our chances grow. In the unlikely event City Council does not approve the placement of the referendum on the ballot, we will be prepared to deliver an additional 30,000 signatures on August 24 to guarantee it gets on the ballot. Already we have 8,000 of the additional 30,000.

Sincerely,

Ted Walter

IRAN: THE ELECTORAL FRAUD HOAX

2009-06-22T23:34:00.007+10:00

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: The choice of Iran's masses

“Change for the poor means food and jobs, not a relaxed dress code or mixed recreation... Politics in Iran is a lot more about class war than religion.”
Financial Times Editorial
June 15, 2009

By: James Petras*

Introduction
There is hardly any election, in which the White House has a significant stake, where the electoral defeat of the pro-US candidate is not denounced as illegitimate by the entire political and mass media elite.

In the most recent period, the White House and its camp followers cried foul following the free (and monitored) elections in Venezuela and Gaza, while joyously fabricating an ‘electoral success’ in Lebanon despite the fact that the Hezbollah-led coalition received over 53% of the vote.

The recently concluded, June 12, 2009 elections in Iran are a classic case: The incumbent nationalist-populist President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (MA) received 63.3% of the vote (or 24.5 million votes), while the leading Western-backed liberal opposition candidate Hossein Mousavi (HM) received 34.2% or (3.2 million votes). Iran’s presidential election drew a record turnout of more than 80% of the electorate, including an unprecedented overseas vote of 234,812, in which HM won 111,792 to MA’s 78,300.

The opposition led by HM did not accept their defeat and organized a series of mass demonstrations that turned violent, resulting in the burning and destruction of automobiles, banks, public building and armed confrontations with the police and other authorities. Almost the entire spectrum of Western opinion makers, including all the major electronic and print media, the major liberal, radical, libertarian and conservative web-sites, echoed the opposition’s claim of rampant election fraud. Neo-conservatives, libertarian conservatives and Trotskyites joined the Zionists in hailing the opposition protestors as the advance guard of a democratic revolution. Democrats and Republicans condemned the incumbent regime, refused to recognize the result of the vote and praised the demonstrators’ efforts to overturn the electoral outcome. The New York Times, CNN, Washington Post, the Israeli Foreign Office and the entire leadership of the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations called for harsher sanctions against Iran and announced Obama’s proposed dialogue with Iran as ‘dead in the water’.

The Electoral Fraud Hoax
Western leaders rejected the results because they ‘knew’ that their reformist candidate could not lose…For months they published daily interviews, editorials and reports from the field ‘detailing’ the failures of Ahmadinejad’s administration; they cited the support from clerics, former officials, merchants in the bazaar and above all women and young urbanites fluent in English, to prove that Mousavi was headed for a landslide victory. A victory for Mousavi was described as a victory for the ‘voices of moderation’, at least the White House’s version of that vacuous cliché.

Prominent liberal academics deduced the vote count was fraudulent because the opposition candidate, Mousavi, lost in his own ethnic enclave among the Azeris. Other academics claimed that the ‘youth vote’ – based on their interviews with upper and middle-class university students from the neighborhoods of Northern Tehran were overwhelmingly for the ‘reformist’ candidate.

What is astonishing about the West’s universal condemnation of the electoral outcome as fraudulent is that not a single shred of evidence in either written or observational form has been presented either before or a week after the vote count. During the entire electoral campaign, no credible (or even dubious) charge of voter tampering was raised. As long as the Western media believed their own propaganda of an immanent victory for their candidate, the electoral process was described as highly competitive, with heated public debates and unprecedented levels of public activity and unhindered by public proselytizing.

The belief in a free and open election was so strong that the Western leaders and mass media believed that their favored candidate would win. The Western media relied on its reporters covering the mass demonstrations of opposition supporters, ignoring and downplaying the huge turnout for Ahmadinejad. Worse still, the Western media ignored the class composition of the competing demonstrations – the fact that the incumbent candidate was drawing his support from the far more numerous poor working class, peasant, artisan and public employee sectors while the bulk of the opposition demonstrators was drawn from the upper and middle class students, business and professional class. Moreover, most Western opinion leaders and reporters based in Tehran extrapolated their projections from their observations in the capital – few venture into the provinces, small and medium size cities and villages where Ahmadinejad has his mass base of support. Moreover the opposition’s supporters were an activist minority of students easily mobilized for street activities, while Ahmadinejad’s support drew on the majority of working youth and household women workers who would express their views at the ballot box and had little time or inclination to engage in street politics.

A number of newspaper pundits, including Gideon Rachman of the Financial Times, claim as evidence of electoral fraud the fact that Ahmadinejad won 63% of the vote in an Azeri-speaking province against his opponent, Mousavi, an ethnic Azeri. The simplistic assumption is that ethnic identity or belonging to a linguistic group is the only possible explanation of voting behavior rather than other social or class interests. A closer look at the voting pattern in the East-Azerbaijan region of Iran reveals that Mousavi won only in the city of Shabestar among the upper and the middle classes (and only by a small margin), whereas he was soundly defeated in the larger rural areas, where the re-distributive policies of the Ahmadinejad government had helped the ethnic Azeris write off debt, obtain cheap credits and easy loans for the farmers. Mousavi did win in the West-Azerbaijan region, using his ethnic ties to win over the urban voters. In the highly populated Tehran province, Mousavi beat Ahmadinejad in the urban centers of Tehran and Shemiranat by gaining the vote of the middle and upper class districts, whereas he lost badly in the adjoining working class suburbs, small towns and rural areas.

The careless and distorted emphasis on ‘ethnic voting’ cited by writers from the Financial Times and New York Times to justify calling Ahmadinejad ‘s victory a ‘stolen vote’ is matched by the media’s willful and deliberate refusal to acknowledge a rigorous nationwide public opinion poll conducted by two US experts just three weeks before the vote, which showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin – even larger than his electoral victory on June 12. This poll revealed that among ethnic Azeris, Ahmadinejad was favored by a 2 to 1 margin over Mousavi, demonstrating how class interests represented by one candidate can overcome the ethnic identity of the other candidate (Washington Post June 15, 2009). The poll also demonstrated how class issues, within age groups, were more influential in shaping political preferences than ‘generational life style’. According to this poll, over two-thirds of Iranian youth were too poor to have access to a computer and the 18-24 year olds “comprised the strongest voting bloc for Ahmadinejad of all groups” (Washington Porst June 15, 2009).

The only group, which consistently favored Mousavi, was the university students and graduates, business owners and the upper middle class. The ‘youth vote’, which the Western media praised as ‘pro-reformist’, was a clear minority of less than 30% but came from a highly privileged, vocal and largely English speaking group with a monopoly on the Western media. Their overwhelming presence in the Western news reports created what has been referred to as the ‘North Tehran Syndrome’, for the comfortable upper class enclave from which many of these students come. While they may be articulate, well dressed and fluent in English, they were soundly out-voted in the secrecy of the ballot box.

In general, Ahmadinejad did very well in the oil and chemical producing provinces. This may have be a reflection of the oil workers’ opposition to the ‘reformist’ program, which included proposals to ‘privatize’ public enterprises. Likewise, the incumbent did very well along the border provinces because of his emphasis on strengthening national security from US and Israeli threats in light of an escalation of US-sponsored cross-border terrorist attacks from Pakistan and Israeli-backed incursions from Iraqi Kurdistan, which have killed scores of Iranian citizens. Sponsorship and massive funding of the groups behind these attacks is an official policy of the US from the Bush Administration, which has not been repudiated by President Obama; in fact it has escalated in the lead-up to the elections.

What Western commentators and their Iranian protégés have ignored is the powerful impact which the devastating US wars and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan had on Iranian public opinion: Ahmadinejad’s strong position on defense matters contrasted with the pro-Western and weak defense posture of many of the campaign propagandists of the opposition. The great majority of voters for the incumbent probably felt that national security interests, the integrity of the country and the social welfare system, with all of its faults and excesses, could be better defended and improved with Ahmadinejad than with upper-class technocrats supported by Western-oriented privileged youth who prize individual life styles over community values and solidarity.

The demography of voting reveals a real class polarization pitting high income, free market oriented, capitalist individualists against working class, low income, community based supporters of a ‘moral economy’ in which usury and profiteering are limited by religious precepts. The open attacks by opposition economists of the government welfare spending, easy credit and heavy subsidies of basic food staples did little to ingratiate them with the majority of Iranians benefiting from those programs. The state was seen as the protector and benefactor of the poor workers against the ‘market’, which represented wealth, power, privilege and corruption.

The Opposition’s attack on the regime’s ‘intransigent’ foreign policy and positions ‘alienating’ the West only resonated with the liberal university students and import-export business groups. To many Iranians, the regime’s military buildup was seen as having prevented a US or Israeli attack. The scale of the opposition’s electoral deficit should tell us is how out of touch it is with its own people’s vital concerns. It should remind them that by moving closer to Western opinion, they removed themselves from the everyday interests of security, housing, jobs and subsidized food prices that make life tolerable for those living below the middle class and outside the privileged gates of Tehran University.

Amhadinejad’s electoral success, seen in historical comparative perspective should not be a surprise. In similar electoral contests between nationalist-populists against pro-Western liberals, the populists have won. Past examples include Peron in Argentina and, most recently, Chavez of Venezuela, Evo Morales in Bolivia and even Lula da Silva in Brazil, all of whom have demonstrated an ability to secure close to or even greater than 60% of the vote in free elections. The voting majorities in these countries prefer social welfare over unrestrained markets, national security over alignments with military empires.

The consequences of the electoral victory of Ahmadinejad are open to debate. The US may conclude that continuing to back a vocal, but badly defeated, minority has few prospects for securing concessions on nuclear enrichment and an abandonment of Iran’s support for Hezbollah and Hamas. A realistic approach would be to open a wide-ranging discussion with Iran, and acknowledging, as Senator Kerry recently pointed out, that enriching uranium is not an existential threat to anyone. This approach would sharply differ from the approach of American Zionists, embedded in the Obama regime, who follow Israel’s lead of pushing for a preemptive war with Iran and use the specious argument that no negotiations are possible with an ‘illegitimate’ government in Tehran which ‘stole an election’.

Recent events suggest that political leaders in Europe, and even some in Washington, do not accept the Zionist-mass media line of ‘stolen elections’. The White House has not suspended its offer of negotiations with the newly re-elected government but has focused rather on the repression of the opposition protesters (and not the vote count). Likewise, the 27 nation European Union expressed ‘serious concern about violence’ and called for the “aspirations of the Iranian people to be achieved through peaceful means and that freedom of expression be respected” (Financial Times June 16, 2009 p.4).

Except for Sarkozy of France, no EU leader has questioned the outcome of the voting. The wild card in the aftermath of the elections is the Israeli response: Netanyahu has signaled to his American Zionist followers that they should use the hoax of ‘electoral fraud’ to exert maximum pressure on the Obama regime to end all plans to meet with the newly re-elected Ahmadinejad regime. Paradoxically, US commentators (left, right and center) who bought into the electoral fraud hoax are inadvertently providing Netanyahu and his American followers with the arguments and fabrications: Where they see religious wars, we see class wars; where they see electoral fraud, we see imperial destabilization.

* James Petras is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

WHAT TURMOIL IN IRAN?

2009-06-21T10:35:00.016+10:00

I believe that the alleged turmoil in Iran is just a storm in a teacup. It has been fanned by the Zionist media in the US and Europe. The reality is that the CIA sponsored the losing candidate, who thought he would win and was shocked by the ineptness of his sponsors.

The CIA will never be effective inside Iran. It is very hard to penetrate a country with such strong dedicated national secret service. For decades, the people of Iran had a justifiable innate hatred of the US. There are a few rotten apples among the Iranian population, who fell victim to Zionist propaganda, but they are quickly identified and dealt with.

Iran has an ideal democratic system, with the clergy playing the role of a senate or an upper house. The president does not have as much power as his counterpart in a quasi democracy, such as that of the US or the UK. Iran has poweful institutions that virtually dictate to the president when it comes to matters of defence or foreign policy. There is no room in Iran's politics for the likes of Blair, Bush, or whatshisface who was the premier of Australia at the time of the ill-fated Iraq invasion in 2003.

The article below sheds more light on CIA attempt to destabilise Iran, which is an almost impossible task:

IRAN ELECTION TURMOIL FINANCED BY CIA

TRN Staff
Friday, 19 June 2009

Tehran, Iran (TRN) -- The ongoing turmoil throughout Iran is a result of deliberate destabilization efforts conducted by the US Central Intelligence Agency.

Operating under an operation code named "Restore a Shah" the CIA has been quietly funneling tens of millions of dollars to activists throughout Iran in order to intentionally foment the tumultuous protests being seen in that country since their recent national election.

For more than two years, tens of millions of dollars in U.S. cash has been covertly smuggled into Iran by U.S. troops operating in Iraq. Sources inside the Pentagon have told TRN that much of that cash was recovered from former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The source went on to say that the funds were never reported to U.S. civilian leaders in order that the CIA could make use of that cash as it deemed appropriate, without congressional oversight.

Iran has long been on the radar screen of U.S. Intelligence agencies after the Iranian Revolution toppled the former Shah of Iran who was useful to the U.S. During that Revolution,

Iranians laid siege to the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, occupying it and holding Embassy staff hostage for 444 days. One of the Iranian students who participated in that Embassy Siege was none other than Iran's current President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

In the photo at right, taken by the CIA outside the U.S. Embassy in Tehran during the Iranian Hostage Crisis, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can be clearly seen holding onto a blindfolded American citizen who was a hostage from the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.

Those hostages were physically abused, deprived of food and water, prevented form getting medical attention. It was only after Ronald Reagan was elected U.S. President in 1980, that the Iranians realized they had to let the hostages go.

Sources in the Reagan White House made known to reporters at the time that before his inauguration, Reagan passed a message to Iran telling them that unless the American Hostages were freed before he was sworn-in as President, his first official act would be to order carpet bombing of Tehran by U.S. military strikes.

Unlike former President Jimmy Carter who seemed paralyzed and unable to use force to free his own citizens, Reagan suffered no such fear. Minutes prior to Reagan's inauguration, Iran released all the U.S. Hostages, bringing the crisis to an end.

When US Intelligence agencies realized who the Iranian President was, and that he was personally one of the henchmen who held Americans captive in the late 1970's it was decided to undertake any and every effort to destroy his Presidency. But with no formal relations with Iran since the Embassy crisis, it was difficult for US Intelligence operatives to enter Iran and to establish contacts. During the second war with Iraq, many U.S. operatives were able to successfully cross into Iran and bring with them tons of U.S. cash. That began laying the foundations for the present day turmoil in Iran.

The goal of the CIA: Topple the Iranian government and install another government which will be more secular and friendly to the U.S.

BBC DECEPTION ABOUT IRAN"S ELECTIONS

2009-06-19T11:46:00.003+10:00

NEWS ANALYSIS
BBC caught in mass deception with Iran propaganda
By: PAUL JOSEPH WATSON

The BBC has again been caught engaging in mass public deception by using photographs of pro-Ahmadinejad rallies in Iran and claiming they represent anti-government protests in favor of Hossein Mousavi.

An image used by the L.A. Times on the front page of its website Tuesday showed Iranian President Ahmadinejad waving to a crowd of supporters at a public event.

In a story covering the election protests yesterday, the BBC News website used a closer shot of the same scene, but with Ahmadinejad cut out of the frame. The caption under the photograph read, "Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi again defied a ban on protests."

The BBC photograph is clearly a similar shot of the same pro-Ahmadinejad rally featured in the L.A. Times image, yet the caption erroneously claims it represents anti-Ahmadinejad protesters.

Switching crowds
“Well I guess it sure was a popular fictional rally for Mousavi, because I later noticed while browsing the news sites a familiar picture on the BBC’s lead Iran story – it shows the same crowd, zoomed in to cut out Ahmadinejad,” a reader told the WhatReallyHappened website.

“It is clearly the same protest as in the background are the same tree and odd circular building. However, the BBC managed to outdo the LA times in quality reporting — their actual comment under the photo from the huge PRO-Ahmadinejad rally reads "Supporters of Mir Hossein Mousavi again defied a ban on protests’ — a blatant lie and deliberately misleading description of what is actually occurring in Iran!”

As soon as the truth about the misrepresented images surfaced on the WhatReallyHappened website yesterday, the BBC changed the photo caption on their original article. This is not the first time the BBC has been caught red-handed using crude image and video framing techniques for the purposes of political propaganda.

During the fall of Baghdad in April 2003, the BBC and other mainstream news outlets broadcast closely framed footage of the “mass uprising” during which Iraqis, aided by US troops, toppled the Saddam Hussein statue in Fardus Square.

Old tricks

The closely framed footage was used to imply that hundreds or thousands of Iraqis were involved in a Berlin Wall-style “historic” liberation, yet when wide angle shots were later published on the Internet, footage that was never broadcast on live television, the reality of the “mass uprising” became clear. The crowd around the statue was sparse and consisted mostly of US troops and journalists.

The BBC later had to admit that only “dozens” of Iraqis had participated in toppling the statue. The entire scene was a manufactured farce yet the propaganda technique of blocking wide-angle shots from being broadcast convinced the world that the event represented a triumphant and historic mass popular uprising on behalf of the Iraqi people.

Whatever your views on the legitimacy of Ahmadinejad and the accuracy of the Iranian election results, the fact that the Anglo-American establishment and its media organs are exploiting and fanning the flames of chaos in Iran to provoke further instability is unquestionable.

Indeed, the US State Department, which routinely demonizes the Internet as a tool of extremists and terrorists when it is used to criticize US foreign policy, took the unprecedented step today of requesting that Twitter.com “delay planned maintenance work so that Iranian protesters can continue to use it to post images and reports of unrest,” according to a London Times report. June 18, 2009.

AMERICA DESERVES BETTER

2009-06-13T11:50:00.008+10:00

The number of signatories as on 13/06/2009

The number reached 52375 on 26/06/2009

If you happen to be a citizen of New York, you should know by now that the World Trade Centre was destroyed by controlled demolition. This fact was proven, beyond any doubt, by no less than 400 AMERICAN SCIENTISTS. It is about time you raised your voice demanding a true investigation of 911. It is a crime committed by the Zionists of Israel, in collaboration with the Zionists of USA government. The Devil in Charge was the Zionist criminal Dick Cheney.

You don't have to accept my research or my own conclusions. ONLY ASK FOR AN UNBIASED INVESTIGATION. Honour your country and all what it used to stand for by raising your voice in support of an investigation that answers to nothing and to no one but evidence and fact, wherever they may lead. Join the families, first responders and survivors of September 11th and millions of US citizens in support of the principles and the freedom for which your forefathers fought and died.

Log on and join your fellow New Yorkers:
http://www.nyccan.org/index.php.

THE HOLOHOAX AND 911

2009-06-01T00:12:00.006+10:00

"As these prisoners were being processed for slave labor, many of their friends and families were being gassed and burned in the ovens in the crematoria. The smoke can be seen in the background. June 1944".Wiesenthal - Cosmetically improved version (Please note that the birdbrain who did the colouring-in put the smoke coming out of the fence post )

"Prisoners who are unfit for work are gassed immediately upon arrival at Yatala Gulag, Adelaide, Australia. Their bodies are burned in the ovens in the crematoria. The smoke can be seen in the background."

(courtesy of http://www.adelaideinstitute.org)

The above two images are an illustration of how photographic evidence can be manipulated. Peter Hartung , the director of Adelaide Institute, sarcastically likens the situation of Frederick Toben to the situation of Jews in the alleged Holocaust.

While fanatic Jews keep on trying to sell Holohoax fiction as reality, revisionist historians continue to expose the terrible myth that Germany had a state policy of gassing Jews and roasting their corpses.

Fanatic Jews have an unlimited supply of money and crook lawyers for the fight against revisionism. The last legal fight they mounted was against Dr Frederick Toben. They followed him from Berlin to London and eventually to his hometown Adelaide in Australia.

Unable to find a method to cripple his research, the Jewdiciary invented a law they called the "Anti-Discrimination Act". It is an unconstitutional piece of legal farce that has a projected aim of protecting minorities from "vilification", and a real aim of stifling debate about the fallacy of the much vaunted "Jewish Holocaust".

Jewish media, especially the Hollywood movie industry, bored the world with their stories about the alleged suffering of the "Jewish people" and repeatedly shouted at us with the slogan "Never Again", except in Gaza and the rest of stolen Palestine.

The reality is that the Jewish Holohoax is a filthy lie that has no real historical evidence, except the ravings of some demented individuals, who suffered the bad experience of being used as forced labour in concentration camps. There, they were poorly fed, but the camps allowed them to have their own theatre and music bands. They were looked after as best as Germany could afford under the harsh conditions the war imposed.

Professor Arthur Butz aptly called the Holocaust "The Hoax of the Twentieth Century". What convinces me more than anything else, that the Holohoax was a lie, is that we all have witnessed a similar lie called 911, which could earn the title "The Hoax of the Twenty First Century"; but that is another story which you may find here:

http://hegazi.blogspot.com/2008/02/911-ultimate-american-deception.html

OBAMA'S NEW FIDDLE

2009-05-17T12:23:00.003+10:00

The shrinking size of the proposed new Palestine

The Two-State Delusion

Alan Sabrosky*
10 May 2009

The world is once again being treated to yet another round in the Israeli-Palestinian “peace process” charade.

The “usual suspects” are posturing, pronouncements are being made, speeches are being given, and hints and rumours about a supposed “toughening” in the US government’s approach to Israel are filtering out from the press. We are supposed to think that something different is about to happen, and that, as the old American folk song had it, “The times, they are a-changing.” It is all nonsense. The whole exercise strikes me as what the old Soviet Army used to call a maskirovka, sort of a complex strategic masquerade on steroids, with rehearsed actors playing their scripted roles before a fully aware and involved audience, and that includes the head of the American NSC and his “leaked” memos. There may be some blunter words said to Netanyahu than he (or other Israeli prime ministers) has heard in a while, but it isn’t unprecedented.

Former President Reagan was very pro-Israeli, but he got so incensed at Israel’s 1982 invasion of Lebanon that he reportedly yelled at then-Israeli Prime Minister Begin and deployed Marines with naval support to block them around Beirut. And regardless of how the intervention ended, there were occasions when US Marines and Israeli troops came right up to the edge of a full-scale fire-fight, and I was assured at the time by several Marine officers who were there that they were fully prepared to slug it out with the IDF if that was required, and the 6^th Fleet had standing orders to go to the mat in their support if that happened - a far cry from 1967, when it had stood back in the face of the deliberate Israeli air and naval attack on the USS Liberty that killed or wounded more than 200 American sailors and Marines.

Today that would never happen, of course, or the US Navy & Marine Corps would have punched a hole through the Israeli blockade on Gaza and ended their assault on it a few months ago. They didn’t, and President Obama wouldn’t have sent them in, either — most of the rest of the world has been outraged by the brutal Israeli action that killed over 1400 Palestinians and wounded thousands more, the majority of them women and children, but all Obama does is talk about America’s undying commitment to the security of “our staunch ally Israel,” while the US Congress declaims its support of “poor, brave little Israel” (sic) and continues to vote billions of dollars in assistance to it. What is going to happen is that stories will leak about “full & frank” discussions between Obama & Netanyahu, and then after hemming and hawing for a while, Netanyahu will grudgingly agree to negotiations leading towards a two-state solution, he will be praised as a “man of peace” (just like Ariel Sharon, right?), and that pot will just keep boiling and boiling until both Obama and Netanyahu go away.

Besides, the two-state solution is a dead-in-the-water derelict, and given the Israeli attitude, probably always was. For it to be viable, three things would absolutely have to happen. First, all Israeli settlements would have to be withdrawn from the West Bank and Palestinian refugees allowed to return without Israeli interference. That isn’t going to happen. Second, a viable Palestinian state would have to be sufficiently well armed to make the Israelis think 10 times before doing a Gaza strike in either part. And last, a viable Palestinian state would need armed guarantees from other nations.

Looking beyond the two-state political zombie requires one to look at the key players. Aside from their impoverishment, geographical separation and vulnerability, about the only cards the Palestinians hold are a willingness to persevere and a comparable willingness to die. The misbegotten Palestinian Authority (PA) is so useless, and its top leaders — Arafat as well as Abbas — have been so bad, that I cannot decide if it and they are creations of Mossad, or simply tolerated to ensure that nothing much better will come along.

Hamas is better for Palestinians, of course, which is why it won the election a few years ago, and it is for that reason more than any other that the Jewish lobbies in the US and elsewhere have made its presence in negotiations all but unthinkable.

Israel itself is a fascinating case study in the principle that people often acquire the worst habits of their oppressors, for the dominant Israeli attitude — views Arabs generally and Palestinians in particular much the way their last oppressors viewed Jews.

There is only one possible fly in this ointment, from the Israeli perspective, and it is the only one that anyone wishing to unravel this Gordian knot can exploit: American public opinion. At present, a large majority of Americans support Israel, having been fed a steady diet for decades of Israeli “victimisation” in the face of Arab “barbarism.” But that support is, as the saying goes in America, “a mile wide and an inch deep,” and AIPAC and company know this, which is why they work so hard to filter what most Americans see, hear and read about the Middle East. But it is a filter that is starting to weaken — a difference that is reflected in growing criticism of Israel and of US support for it. Disrupt this pro-Israel filter, make historical events like the Israeli assault on the USS Liberty and the IDF’s murder of a young American woman named Rachel Corrie household words in the US, bring images of ravaged Gaza into American homes, and watch the world start to change — because it can. And the technology is there to do this.

* Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College.

THE FAKE OBAMA

2009-05-14T13:24:00.002+10:00

To Be Black and Head of the U.S. Empire:
A Contradiction in Terms

By: Larry Pinkney

The inescapable but deliberately ignored irony about Barack Obama being installed as this nation’s first so-called black president is that being Black in ‘America’ has in reality always meant so much more than mere color pigmentation.

To be the head of the most aggressive, violent, and hypocritical empire on this planet is not to be Black. It is to be opportunistically and cynically hypocritical while serving the interests of continued U.S. Empire. Those who choose to wrap themselves in the security blanket of the supposed wonderfulness of Obama’s so-called Blackness while ignoring the ongoing horrors that this person supports, are deeply complicitous in perpetrating the misery that this empire is heaping upon Black, White, Brown, Red, and Yellow peoples both inside and outside of its physical borders.

In April of 2007, this writer unapologetically wrote that: “Beyond mere color, being Black is first and foremost a conscious political, social, and economic commitment to the struggle for the collective betterment of the descendants of the Black slavery holocaust in what has now become the United States of America, in conjunction with other people of color and humanity as a whole.” (Reference The Black Commentator, April 19, 2007, issue 226, article entitled, To Be Black In America: An Unflinching Necessity.) In that same aforementioned article, your writer further wrote: “Blackness is, in fact, not only a rainbow of color but also a rainbow of active consciousness and commitment.”

Negrodian misleaders and their so-called “progressive” and “liberal” white counterparts have put forth and pontificated virtually every imaginable sorry excuse as to why Barack Obama and his current regime of the U.S. Empire should be supported. It is a truly pathetic for all conscious people of conscience of all colors to witness.

As the bloody U.S. wars of aggression rage on in Iraq and Afghanistan, and as the war drums of U.S. Empire intensify and deepen into Pakistan under the Obama regime; the peace movement in the United States has been castrated (i.e. made null and void), roaring overwhelmingly with a deafening silence.

As the bankers, the insurance companies, and the other gluttonous barons of Wall Street gorge themselves with trillions of dollars of the people’s money; as more and more people lose their jobs; and as every conceivable action is engaged in to crush the labor movement and the economic and political rights of working people in this nation; the Barack Obama regime, like clever rhetorical sorcerers of the system, keep pouring and passing around the poisonous Kool-Aid of rhetoric for the masses to gulp and ultimately die upon.

Be we Black, Brown, White, Red, or Yellow there is absolutely no legitimate excuse for wrapping ourselves in the hypocrisy of U.S. Empire. We all know, or certainly should know, that the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and now Pakistan are wrong and unacceptable.

Had George W. Bush boycotted and attempted to sabotage the recent United Nations Conference on Racism (in Durban) as did the Barack Obama administration, there would have been enormous outcry from the so-called Black and White left in the U.S. Had George W. Bush continued and even expanded upon the so-called “extraordinary rendition” program (i.e. the illegal kidnapping of persons in other nations by the U.S. Government) as has Barack Obama, there would have been unquenchable outrage! Why the virtual silence and hypocrisy now? It’s time to stop being hypocrites and apologists for yet another administration of U.S. Empire and hegemony.

To be Black has increasingly become clearly less and less about mere color and increasingly about the commitment to political, economic, and social justice.