Fact not Fiction by Mohammed A. Hegazi

AN INVENTION CALLED BIN LADEN

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sat, 12 Dec 2009 22:30:00 +0000

False photos of Bin Laden who died in 2001 were concocted by CIA and propagated by Aljazeerah TV

US Openly Accepts Bin Laden Long Dead

By: Gordon Duff*
December 10, 2009

Conservative commentator, former Marine Colonel Bob Pappas has been saying for years that bin Laden died at Tora Bora and that Senator Kerry's claim that bin Laden escaped with Bush help was a lie. Now we know that Pappas was correct. The embarassment of having Secretary of State Clinton talk about bin Laden in Pakistan was horrific. He has been dead since December 13, 2001 and now, finally, everyone, Obama, McChrystal, Cheney, everyone who isn't nuts is finally saying what they have known for years.

However, since we lost a couple of hundred of our top special operations forces hunting for bin Laden after we knew he was dead, is someone going to answer for this with some jail time? Since we spent 200 million dollars on "special ops" looking for someone we knew was dead, who is going to jail for that? Since Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney continually talked about a man they knew was dead, now known to be for reasons of POLITICAL nature, who is going to jail for that? Why were tapes brought out, now known to be forged, as legitimate intelligence to sway the disputed 2004 election in the US? This is a criminal act if there ever was one.

In 66 pages, General Stanley McChrystal never mentions Osama bin Laden. Everything is "Mullah Omar" now. In his talk at West Point, President Obama never mentioned Osama bin Laden. Col. Pappas makes it clear, Vice President Cheney let it "out of the bag" long ago. Bin Laden was killed by American troops many many years ago.

America knew Osama bin Laden died December 13, 2001. After that, his use was hardly one to unite America but rather one to divide, scam and play games. With bin Laden gone, we could have started legitimate nation building in Afghanistan instead of the eternal insurgency that we invented ourselves.

Without our ill informed policies, we could have had a brought diplomatic solution in 2002 in Afghanistan, the one we are ignoring now, and spent money rebuilding the country, 5 cents on the dollar compared to what we are spending fighting a war against an enemy we ourselves recruited thru ignorance.

The bin Laden scam is one of the most shameful acts ever perpetrated against the American people. We don't even know if he really was an enemy, certainly he was never the person that Bush and Cheney said. In fact, the Bush and bin Laden families were always close friends and had been for many years.

What kind of man was Osama bin Laden? This one time American ally against Russia, son of a wealthy Saudi family, went to Afghanistan to help them fight for their freedom. America saw him as a great hero then. Transcripts of the real bin Laden show him to be much more moderate than we claim, angry at Israel and the US government but showing no anger toward Americans and never making the kind of threats claimed. All of this is public record for any with the will to learn.

How much of America's tragedy is tied with these two children of the rich, children of families long joined thru money and friendship, the Bush and bin Laden clans.One son died in remote mountains, another lives in a Dallas suburb hoping nobody is sent after him. One is a combat veteran, one never took a strong stand unless done from safety and comfort. Islam once saw bin Laden as a great leader. Now he is mostly forgotten.

What has America decided about Bush?

We know this: Bin Laden always denied any ties to 9/11 and, in fact, has never been charged in relation to 9/11. He not only denied involvement, but had done so, while alive, 4 times and had vigorously condemned those who were involved in the attack.

This is on the public record, public in every free country except ours. We, instead, showed films made by paid actors, made up to look somewhat similar to bin Laden, actors who contradicted bin Laden’s very public statements, actors pretending to be bin Laden long after bin Laden's death.

These were done to help justify spending, repressive laws, torture and simple thievery.

For years, we attacked the government of Pakistan for not hunting down someone everyone knew was dead. Bin Laden's death hit the newspapers in Pakistan on December 15, 2001. How do you think our ally felt when they were continually berated for failing to hunt down and turn over someone who didn't exist?

What do you think this did for American credibility in Pakistan and thru the Islamic world? Were we seen as criminals, liars or simply fools? Which one is best? This is also treason.

How does the death of bin Laden and the defeat and dismemberment of Al Qaeda impact the intelligence assessments, partially based on, not only bin Laden but Al Qaeda activity in Iraq that, not only never happened but was now known to have been unable to happen?

How many "Pentagon Pundits," the retired officers who sold their honor to send us to war for what is now known to be domestic political dirty tricks and not national security are culpable in these crimes?

I don't always agree with Col. Pappas on things. I believe his politics overrule his judgement at times. However, we totally agree on bin Laden, simply disagree with what it means. To me lying and sending men to their deaths based on lies is treason.

Falsifying military intelligence and spending billions on unnecessary military operations for political reasons is an abomination. Consider this, giving billions in contracts to GOP friends who fill campaign coffers, and doing so based on falsified intelligence is insane. This was done for years.

We spent 8 years chasing a dead man, spending billions, sending FBI agents, the CIA, Navy Seals, Marine Force Recon, Special Forces, many to their deaths, as part of a political campaign to justify running American into debt, enriching a pack of political cronies and war profiteers and to puff up a pack of Pentagon peacocks and their Whitehouse draft dodging bosses.

How many laws were pushed thru because of a dead man?

How many hundreds were tortured to find a dead man?

How many hundreds died looking for a dead man?

How many billions were spent looking for a dead man?

Every time Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld stood before troops and talked about hunting down the dead bin Laden, it was a dishonor. Lying to men and women who put their lives on the line is not a joke. Who is going to answer to the families of those who died for the politics and profit tied to the Hunt for Bin Laden?

* Gordon Duff is a US Marine combat veteran and regular contributor on political and social issues. He is Senior Editor of “Veterans Today”.

A VISIT BY FREDRICK TOBEN

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:41:00 +0000

Latest photo of Fredrick Toben in Australian prison at Cadell

I was sitting quietly in my study room reflecting on the reasons for the steady decline of the evil American empire. I had on my computer screen a graph showing the diminishing amount of Euros US dollars could buy. Mathematically, the trend showed no respite for those useless green pieces of paper. Their value will continue to decline until they become cheaper than toilet paper. Historically, whenever American economy weakened, Jews who run America created a flimsy reason in order to wage a war in some miserable small country far away from home, while the average American fat nuts continued to patriotically wave their rags of stars and stripes. Political analysts are almost in total agreement that another war is unlikely. I tend to differ, those bastards thrive on war and destruction. They have no regard for human life. The only wars on American soil had to be civil wars, and they are heading for one between the ruling Jewish machine and the rest of the impoverished population who are beginning to realise that their country has been highjacked.

The phone ringing cut my thoughts and the familiar voice of Fredrick Toben at the other end came with a cheerful tone, “Mohammed, I am in Melbourne right now, driving through St. Kilda (Jewsville!), where and when could we have a cuppa?. My home was a suitable venue and ASAP was a suitable time. Fredrick looked amazingly slim and active. I asked him about the delay of his new book to which he answered that he would soon see the publishers in America.

- What? Are you really planning to travel to that God-forsaken piece of shit (pardon my French)?
- Yes.
- I would not go there even if I were offered free passage and free five-star accommodation. I would rather visit Iran and enjoy good manners and sincere modest hospitality. The country oozes culture and moral values. Americans are the descendants of rogue adventurers. They seem to be criminals by nature. They did prove it in their insignificant short history of a few hundred years.
- Mohammed! They are not all that bad. It is only because of the political elite who took over the country.
- Come on Freddie, do they import soldiers from Mars in order to do the killing in Iraq and Afghanistan?
- Thanks Mohammed, I don’t have sugar with my coffee.
- A piece of cake?
- No thanks, I am on diet.

HOW JEWS RUN THE USA

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Mon, 02 Nov 2009 02:58:00 +0000

This scene is not unique. It can happen wherever Jews constitute a majority. They have their own agendas and receive instructions as to how to vote. There is no need to pay attention to any discussion.

House Minority Leader Lawrence F. Cafero Jr., R-Norwalk, pictured standing, far right, speaks while colleagues Rep. Barbara Lambert, D-Milford and Rep. Jack F. Hennessy, D-Bridgeport, play solitaire, as the House convened to vote on a new budget. The guy sitting in the row in front of these jokers is on Facebook, and the guy behind Hennessy is checking out the baseball scores.

These are the Jews who are bringing down the USA to its inevitable demise in the not-so-distant future. It could happen much sooner than expected, while those Jewish yo-yo’s might still be playing solitaire.

REPORT ON FREDRICK TOBEN

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:03:00 +0000

For those who do not know Fredrick Toben, he is an outstanding and outspoken revisionist. His work is dedicated to exposing the fallacy of the mythical so-called “Jewish Holocaust”. The dogmatic assertion by fanatic Jews, that six million of their tribe were gassed and roasted by the Germans, is a sick joke that has been marketed by the Jew-controlled mass media since WW2. Revisionists are out to expose this filthy lie.

Jews have been relying on this lie, in order to milk sympathy and reparations from a gullible world that has been captive to the Jew media until the advent of the Internet. It is this marvellous new medium, the Internet, that enables you to read these humble lines and to exchange messages and opinions in real time. Jews failed to distract serious work on the Internet by their pornography sites. So, they are now trying the legal backdoor in order to shut down sites that expose their activities.

Toben has been recently framed by three Australian Jewish judges, in a high court, and sent to prison on account of a flimsy Jewish allegation of “contempt of court”. The alleged contempt charge emanated from his refusal to stop exposing the Holohoax lie, according to an order from an Australian Jewish judge, in a lower court.

Dr. Fredrick Toben, who committed no crime, was unfairly arrested on 13/08/2009 and taken to a low security prison in a small South Australian country town called “Cadell”, where he is staying for a prison term of three months, until 12/11/2009.

I paid Toben a visit on 10/10/2009, together with our mutual friend Peter Hartung. Peter is the present director of Adelaide Institute, an organisation that is causing Jews much trouble by being on the alert exposing their lies. Peter lives in the city of Adelaide, which is less than 200 km from Cadell. This enabled him to pay frequent visits to Fredrick. On the way, I asked Peter, “How is Fred coping?” He replied, “Fred is in great shape. He is more determined than ever to continue the fight after this minor hiccup.”

We arrived to Cadell at one o’clock. We had to wait until the “prisoner” came to the visitors area. We were allowed to stay for three hours under the indirect surveillance of the prison guards. We had a “picnic lunch” with Fred and discussed our future plans of our long protracted fight against Jewish distortion of history.

Trying to comfort, or probably tease, Fred I commented, “Any change is healthy, even a short spell in prison would be!” Fred spontaneously shouted back, “What? Let the bastards wait until I get out of here. Don’t you worry Mohammed, I understand the mentality of those people.”

To all friends of Fredrick Toben, he is fit and well. In his captivity, he would have had the time to think. I gathered that he would come out with a thunderous new book that would send shock waves down the spine of the cowardly vermin that sent him to prison, on account of expressing his opinions. It all happened because Australian Jews managed to pass unconstitutional laws that infringe upon the right of all Australians to free speech.

BLAIR THE BLATANT HABITUAL LIAR FULLY EXPOSED

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 20:40:00 +0000

Here are some of the key statements made by Blair, as prime minister, about Saddam Hussein's weapons - before and after the war. [Source: BBC archives]

10 April 2002, House of Commons
"Saddam Hussein's regime is despicable, he is developing weapons of mass destruction, and we cannot leave him doing so unchecked.
"He is a threat to his own people and to the region and, if allowed to develop these weapons, a threat to us also."
Full story

24 September 2002, House of Commons
"It [the intelligence service] concludes that Iraq has chemical and biological weapons, that Saddam has continued to produce them, that he has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes, including against his own Shia population; and that he is actively trying to acquire nuclear weapons capability..."
Full story

25 February 2003, House of Commons
"The intelligence is clear: (Saddam) continues to believe his WMD programme is essential both for internal repression and for external aggression.
"The biological agents we believe Iraq can produce include anthrax, botulinum, toxin, aflatoxin and ricin. All eventually result in excruciatingly painful death."
Full story

11 March 2003, MTV debate
"If we don't act now, then we will go back to what has happened before and then of course the whole thing begins again and he carries on developing these weapons and these are dangerous weapons, particularly if they fall into the hands of terrorists who we know want to use these weapons if they can get them."
Full story

18 March 2003, House of Commons
"We are asked now seriously to accept that in the last few years-contrary to all history, contrary to all intelligence-Saddam decided unilaterally to destroy those weapons. I say that such a claim is palpably absurd."
Full story

4 June 2003, House of Commons
"There are literally thousands of sites. As I was told in Iraq, information is coming in the entire time, but it is only now that the Iraq survey group has been put together that a dedicated team of people, which includes former UN inspectors, scientists and experts, will be able to go in and do the job properly.
"As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction."
Full story

8 July 2003, Evidence to Commons liaison committee
"I don't concede it at all that the intelligence at the time was wrong.
"I have absolutely no doubt at all that we will find evidence of weapons of mass destruction programmes."
Full story

16 December 2003, Interview with British Forces Broadcasting Service
"The Iraq Survey Group has already found massive evidence of a huge system of clandestine laboratories, workings by scientists, plans to develop long range ballistic missiles."
Full story

16 December 2003, Interview with BBC Arabic Service
"I don't think it's surprising we will have to look for them. I'm confident that when the Iraq Survey Group has done its work we will find what's happened to those weapons because he had them."
4 January, 2004, Speech to British forces near Basra, Iraq
"Repressive states are developing weapons that could cause destruction on a massive scale."
Full story

11 January 2004 , Interview with BBC Breakfast with Frost
What you can say is that we received that intelligence about Saddam's programmes and about his weapons that we acted on that, it's the case throughout the whole of the conflict.
I remember having conversations with the chief of defence staff and other people were saying well, we think we might have potential WMD find here or there.
Now these things didn't actually come to anything in the end, but I don't know is the answer. And what I do know is that the group of people that are in there now, this Iraq survey group, they produced an interim report."
Full story

25 January 2004, Interview with the Observer newspaper
"I have absolutely no doubt in my mind that the intelligence was genuine.
"It is absurd to say in respect of any intelligence that it is infallible, but if you ask me what I believe, I believe the intelligence was correct, and I think in the end we will have an explanation."
Full story

3 February, 2004, evidence to Commons liaison committee
"What is true about (ex-Iraq Survey Group head) David Kay's evidence, and this is something I have to accept, and is one of the reasons why I think we now need a new inquiry - it is true David Kay is saying we have not found large stockpiles of actual weapons."
Full story

6 June, 2004, BBC Radio 4 Today programme
"What we also know is we haven't found them [weapons of mass destruction] in Iraq - now let the survey group complete its work and give us the report... They will not report that there was no threat from Saddam, I don't believe."
Full story

6 July, 2004, evidence to Commons Liaison Committee
"I have to accept we haven't found them (WMD) and we may never find them, We don't know what has happened to them. "They could have been removed. They could have been hidden. They could have been destroyed."
Full story

14 July, 2004, statement on the Butler report
"We expected, I expected to find actual usable, chemical or biological weapons after we entered Iraq.
"But I have to accept, as the months have passed, it seems increasingly clear that at the time of invasion, Saddam did not have stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons ready to deploy."
Full story

28 September, 2004, keynote Labour conference speeech
"The evidence about Saddam having actual biological and chemical weapons, as opposed to the capability to develop them, has turned out to be wrong. I acknowledge that and accept it. I simply point out, such evidence was agreed by the whole international community, not least because Saddam had used such weapons against his own people and neighbouring countries.
"And the problem is, I can apologise for the information that turned out to be wrong, but I can't, sincerely at least, apologise for removing Saddam.
"The world is a better place with Saddam in prison not in power."
"I can apologise for the information being wrong but I can never apologise, sincerely at least, for removing Saddam. The world is a better place with Saddam in prison."
Full story

29 September speaking on BBC Radio 4's Today programme
The prime minister was asked about UN secretary general Kofi Annan's assertion that the war with Iraq was illegal.
"That is his view - it is not our view," Mr Blair said.
"The view we took at the time and we take it now is that the war was justified legally because he [Saddam Hussein] remained in breach of UN resolutions."

Full story

THE WAR CRIMINAL TO HEAD THE EU

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:17:00 +0000

The Scotsman newspaper
9 October 2009

FORMER prime minister Tony Blair was publicly snubbed by a bereaved father yesterday who accused him of having "blood on his hands" for sending troops to fight in Iraq.

Mr Blair, who has repeatedly defended his decision to lead Britain into the conflict, was rebuked by Peter Brierley, whose son, Lance Corporal Shaun Brierley, 28, was killed in 2003.

The clash came at a reception for guests who had attended a commemoration service marking the end of Operation Telic – the Iraq campaign – and honouring the 179 British personnel who died during the six-year conflict.

Mr Brierley refused to shake Mr Blair's outstretched hand at the event staged at the Guildhall in London and told the politician: "I'm not shaking your hand, you've got blood on it."

The former prime minister was ushered away and afterwards Mr Brierley, from Batley, West Yorkshire, said: "I understand soldiers go to war and die but they have to go to war for a good reason and be properly equipped to fight. I believe Tony Blair is a war criminal. I can't bear to be in the same room as him. I can't believe he's been allowed to come to this reception."I believe he's got the blood of my son and all of the other men and women who died out there on his hands."

His son was a 28-year-old radio systems operator with 212 Signal Squadron when he was killed in a road traffic accident in March 2003 in Kuwait while serving in Operation Telic.

Readers’ Comments:
(1)....that he ( Saddam Hussein) has existing and active military plans for the use of chemical and biological weapons, which could be activated within 45 minutes -24 Sep 2002
"There are literally thousands of sites. As I was told in Iraq
"As I have said throughout, I have no doubt that they will find the clearest possible evidence of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction." - 4 June 2003
"I don't concede it at all that the intelligence at the time was wrong.
"I have absolutely no doubt at all that we will find evidence of weapons of mass destruction programmes." 8 July 2003
"We expected, I expected to find actual usable, chemical or biological weapons after we entered Iraq. 14 July, 2004
"The evidence about Saddam having actual biological and chemical weapons, as opposed to the capability to develop them, has turned out to be wrong. I acknowledge that and accept it.28 September, 2004
"The view we took at the time and we take it now is that the war was justified legally because he [Saddam Hussein] remained in breach of UN resolutions." 29 September 2004
All by Tony Blair from the BBC - http://tinyurl.com/ygf7nrn

(2)Tony Blair heard some home truths at both the service and the reception commemorating the dead of the Iraq war. Rowan Williams said that both policy makers and commentators warbled on about the looming conflict without really measuring the price that was going to be paid by those involved. He suggested that if those in power were to take any lesson from the build-up to the Iraq war, it was the importance of avoiding exaggerated rhetoric. “Perhaps we have learned something, if only that there is a time to keep silence, a time to let go of the satisfyingly overblown language that is so tempting to human beings when war is in the air." Blair learned something else when Peter Brierley, whose son was killed, refused to shake his hand because his son’s blood was on the hands of the former PM. Of course three Blair’s bodyguards sprang into action, ushering him away from reality. Yet almost 200 British soldiers died between the start of the conflict in March 2003 and the withdrawal of British troops in April this year. Brierley later spoke for all service families such as my own when he said, “The truth is that we went to war on the lies told by Tony Blair about the fictional weapons of mass destruction. He sent our fine men and women to fight without proper transport, kit or arms. And as a result of that decision, I have lost my son whereas Blair has made £14million on the back of taking us to war and they are now talking about making him president of the EU.” EAXCTLY!!!!

(3) Comment by Mohammed A Hegazi:
Tony Blair was not the only war criminal. The war on Iraq involved Cheney, Bush, Blair and an Australian shrimp. They all connived and lied in order to wage a war for oil. They all ignored the voice of the people who moved en-masse in unprecedented numbers in order to show their opposition to the war. Yet, we still have Kevin Rudd in Australia, in a typically Jewish manner, dragging his feet about pulling the last Australian soldier out of Iraq.

WHO IS JAMES TRAFICANT

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:02:00 +0000

The word Traficant has nothing to do with traffic. In order to make a name, it has always been a Jewish tradition to select a common word and mutilate it by adding or deleting a few letters. Putting this aside aside, James or Jim Traficant is a US Jewish ex-senator. Being a bit far-sighted, he could see the damage caused to the US as a result of its one-eyed policies in the Middle East and its unlimited support of Israel’s dangerous expansionist policies that destroyed the economy and standing of the US to a point that is now beyond repair.

Traficant raised the alarm seven years ago, when the so called neo-cons were at the helm, steering the US empire to its inevitable end, which came faster than all expectations. His fellow Jews did not like his attitude at the time, so they quickly fabricated or, to be more exact, exposed some of his practices that are common to most US politicians, and fall into the realm of white-collar crimes. He was sent to prison, which is the popular method for Jews to eliminate their political opponents.

Traficant came out of prison only to emerge far more defiant than before. He found his way to the Jew-controlled media via a Jewish backdoor. In a video clip, which might not last for long on Utube, he is being interviewed by Greta Van Susteren , a Jewess who must be at least 20 years past her “use by date”. Both pretended to be discussing the issue of Israel-US relations in a fair manner, but you can sense the typical Jewish methodology of slipping some poison into the honey. The usual cliché of “ain’t you being anti-Semite?” was thrown at the miserable guest, to which he did not reply by, “But I am a Semite myself.”

While Traficant did raise important true and sincere patriotic issues about the fatal error of supporting Israel, he had to stick to common Jewish fallacies such as:

∙ Israel is the only true ally of the US in the middle East.
∙ Arabs export terrorism to the US, a view that supports the common lies about 911.

Anyway, the clip is really worth watching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0scNGzWfv8A

ONLY IN AMERICA

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:57:00 +0000

Would you believe such American passive ignorance? It can happen only in America, where ignorance prevails among those fat tv-bound dummies.3000 Americans died inside the buildings of the World Trade Center in New York City on 9 September 2001. Forget about the millions killed by Americans or Jews, in the wars that followed in Afghanistan, Iraq and Palestine. Just think from a pragmatic American angle:

When a patriotic movement demonstrated requesting proper investigation of what happened, only 300 people took part. If 80 thousand people signed a petition demanding a proper investigation, one would expect a sizeable fraction of them to demonstrate on a Sunday. But this did not happen.

I can now understand why Jews controlled America. The reason is such apathy, laziness, ignorance and sheep mentality. I would not be surprised if most of the herd still believed that Osama Bin Laden planned and executed such horrendous crime.Click on the links below and see for yourself:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkCos-y-WWM

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VptWc4F3wNQ
http://hegazi.blogspot.com/2008/02/911-ultimate-american-deception.html

NYC CAN CANNOT!

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:43:00 +0000

As per previous posts, NYC CAN is a popular movement by more than 80 thousand New York City citizens, not to mention the silent majority they might represnt. The aim of the movement is to investigate the 911 coverup. I totally support the movement, but I also claim myself an expert on matters Jewish. As such, I expect the movement to be totally drowned by the Jews of New York. Below is the latest info release by NYC CAN. I read it differently from many unsuspecting citizens of this world. When I sifted quickly through the lines, I came across the name "Judge Lehner", who is obviously a Jew. Many might say, "So what?". Well, wait and see for yourself. Here is the NYC CAN latest report about their march, which will take place in a few hours:

MARCH FOR ANSWERS

September 27, 2009 2pm Battery Park (State Street) to City Hall

List of Speakers:

Bob McIlvaine - 9/11 Family Member
Manny Badillo - 9/11 Family Member
Daniel Sunjata - Star of FOX's "Rescue Me"
Eileen Coles - 9/11 Survivor and Whistleblower
Major Mike McCormack - 9/11 First Responder
Mark Crispin Miller - Professor of Media Studies at NYU

*Live Feed of March Likely! Check Website Before March!
__________________________________________
Breaking News: Court Referee Recommends Ruling in Favor of City;
NYC CAN To File Motion To Reject Referee's Recommendation
Rather than waiting until the scheduled decision date of Monday, September 28, Referee Louis Crespo issued his "report and recommendations" on Friday, September 25, and recommended that the Court rule in favor of the City.

After reviewing the referee's report, we feel he did not give adequate consideration to the extensive arguments presented in our memorandum of law submitted on Monday, September 21. The report seemed more a cut and paste from the City's original motion papers than a balanced weighing of the arguments. In particular, the referee's report failed to analyze the vast majority of NYC CAN's legal points as to why the City's claims were unfounded and its reliance on certain case law wholly inapplicable.

Officially, Judge Lehner has up to 60 days to either adopt, modify, or reject the referee's report and recommendation, and render a decision. However, with the deadline for inclusion on the ballot fast approaching, NYC CAN lawyers will bring a motion on Monday, September 28 to ask the Court to reconsider the matter immediately, and render a judgment in favor of the Petitioners. We anticipate that the matter will be heard and decided on Tuesday, September 29, or Wednesday, September 30.

Judge Lehner may decide the case on the paperwork submitted, or hear oral arguments as well. If oral arguments are ordered, the proceeding should be open to the public. If so, we will ask everyone who can to attend and help maintain the tidal wave of support that will crescendo with the March For Answers on Sunday.

Only in fighting to the very end will the voices of 80,000 New Yorkers resonate across the country, and those who are still asleep awaken to the mockery of justice in a local government claiming it has no jurisdiction over thousands of its residents being murdered.

The 9/11 Commission Report - a disgrace to any society that considers itself just, democratic and transparent; and a shameless affront to those who died on September 11th - is on its last legs.
Thinkers think and talkers talk. Patriots ACT.

www.NYCCAN.org

NEY YORK CITY DEMANDS PROPER 911 INVESTIGATION

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Thu, 24 Sep 2009 00:29:00 +0000

The following item is a message from NYC CAN requesting celebrities to join a march demanding proper re-investigation of the 911 coverup. Will this endeavour succeed in bringing Cheney and his mafia to justice? Personally, I believe that American democracy is dead, but you never know what could happen if people are united:

MARCH FOR ANSWERS NYC CAN:

An Open Letter to All Celebrities Who Want A New 9/11 Investigation March For AnswersSeptember 27, 2009 2pm Battery Park 80,000 New Yorkers have signed a petition to place a referendum for a new 9/11 investigation on this November’s ballot. Over 100 victims’ family members are leading this call, and are joined by dozens of first responders and survivors.

The city government is now attempting to silence the voice of the people by challenging the legality of the petition. NYC CAN, the sponsoring organization, is not backing down, and a legal battle with the City has unfolded. Click to read NYC CAN's legal memo.

In a truly democratic society, this monumental democratic statement and subsequent attempt to silence the voices of 80,000 voters would be widely reported in the media. In our society, such monumental efforts only register if they have the vocal support of people like you.

Now is our chance. This Sunday, September 27 at 2pm, supporters of this historic initiative will march from Battery Park past Ground Zero and the State Supreme Court all the way to the steps of City Hall.

At this critical moment in the pursuit of truth about 9/11, we ask you to join us as we MARCH FOR ANSWERS. Now is the time to stand UP and stand WITH the 80,000 proud New Yorkers who have courageously said YES, we MUST investigate 9/11!

Your single voice can allow for the voices of 80,000 New Yorkers to be heard, which in turn will bring unprecedented legitimacy to your voice when you call for a new 9/11 investigation. Together, we can take a giant step toward justice and accountability.

Please contact NYC CAN at (917) 627-8467 to be a part of this historic march.

Sincerely,
Donna Marsh O’Connor, Mother of Vanessa Lang Langer
Bob McIlvaine, Father of Bobby McIlvaine
Jean Canavan, Sister-in-Law of Sean Canavan
Manny Badillo, Nephew of Thomas Joseph Sgroi
Janette MacKinlay, Survivor.

_________________________________

Meet Bob McIlvaine
Bob's son Bobby was killed on 9/11. Bob knows that his son's death is the pretext for the wars the US government has waged since 9/11. Bob stood by helplessly as the White House official who wrote the Preemptive War strategy, Philip Zelikow, went on to run the 9/11 Commission's investigation into his son's murder. Is it a conflict of interest that the same Bush insider who wrote the policy of Preemptive War also wrote the pretext justifying that policy? Is his word good in your book? Not in Bob's book.

That's why on Sunday, September 27 Bob will march alongside the 80,000 New Yorkers who have called for a new 9/11 investigation; one that will NOT be run by those who advocate wars. He hopes you will too.

JEWS WAGING BIOLOGICAL WARFARE ON AMERICA AND THE WORLD

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 23:35:00 +0000

The article below sheds much light on the manufactured pandemic scare waged from time to time in the form of red herrings such as swine flu, bird flu and the like:

Len Horowitz - Pandemic Charges Filed With FBI In NYC
Attorney Harold H. Burbank, II

Friends,
The substance of the message below on a false flag h1n1 flu pandemic has been widely discussed on the net for months, but the message indicates the first serious US legal action I have seen on it. I have with the help of many been tracking this issue as it affects states and localities, anticipating the need to file injunction lawsuits v. any government taking steps to compel vaccination. It is presumed by Dr. Horowitz and others that government will attempt to compel vaccination v. h1n1, which is not possible under current law, especially US Constitution and state constitution law for many First Amendment and related privacy and civil rights reasons. I offer the message as a warning as to how serious the talks, research and some of the proposed h1n1 policy state laws under consideration opposing civil rights, especially in ME, MA and OK, have become.

Having read of lawsuits filed against h1n1 in Europe for reasons indicated in the below article, I am convinced that there is considerable reason not to take any new so called h1n1 vaccine, and to prepare for simlilar suits in the US, which I am prepared to do.

To lawyers receiving this message, I welcome your comments on how to prepare clients and friends to defend against unconstitutional h1n1 legislation and acts, and any common effort we might begin in the US.

Harold Burbank
2008 CT Green Party candidate, US House
Release: No. H1N1-15
Date Mailed: Sept. 15, 2009
For Immediate Release
Contact: Rob Potter--(959) 715-1520 or 310-877-5002

LOS ANGELES, CA -- Drug-industry investigators have uncovered documents exposing an international drug ring, operating from New York City, is behind the H1N1 swine flu fright and vaccination preparations.

Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Sherri Kane, an investigative journalist, have released evidence in legal affidavits that leaders of a private global biotechnology "trust" are behind the pandemic flu, including its origin and alleged prevention via vaccinations. Their documents, being sent by attorneys to the FBI this week, evidence industrialists are operating a crime ring within the "Partnership for New York City" (PNYC), and are behind the pandemic's creation, media persuasions, vaccination preparations, and health official promotions.

"David Rockefeller's trust, that engages several powerful partners on Wall Street, including media moguls Ruppert Murdock, Morton Zuckerman, Thomas Glocer, and former Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Jerry Speyer, are implicated in advancing global genocide," Dr. Horowitz wrote to FBI directors.

"This 'partnership' controls biotechnology research and development globally. Health commerce internationally is also controlled virtually entirely by this trust that also exercises near complete control over mainstream media to promote/propagandize its products and services for the drug cartel's organized crime. This trust, in essence, makes or breaks medical and natural healing markets, primarily through the mass media companies and propaganda it wields for social engineering and market building," Dr. Horowitz wrote.

Among the revelations from the Horowitz-Kane research are those linking Larry Silverstein of Silverstein Properties, Inc., and the 9-11 terrorist attacks, to the drug cartel's geopolitical, economic, and population reduction activities. Mr. Silverstein, leaser of the World Trade Center who authorized to have Building-7 "pulled" [detonated] is a chief suspect in the "9-11 truth" investigation. Silverstein is currently landlord and co-partner in the biotechnology trust founded by David Rockefeller and implicated by these new discoveries.

Given the unprecedented nature and urgency of these findings, Dr. Horowitz has posted his affidavit for public review on FLUscam.com, hoping wide spread dissemination will prompt governments worldwide to cease mass vaccination preparations to avoid becoming accessories.

"The last time I contacted the FBI I warned them about the impending anthrax attacks one week before the first mailings were announced in the press," Dr. Horowitz recalled. "It took them 6 months to respond. When they did, they made me a suspect in the mailings. This time I am warning the Justice Department a month before the deadliest genocide in history. I'm praying they'll take kindly to my appeal for a PNYC investigation, and Court-ordered injunction, to stop the vaccinations for public protection."
-End-

Attorney Harold H. Burbank, II
84 N. Mountain Rd.
Canton, CT 06019
860.693.2687
email haroldburbank@comcast.net

FRAUDULENT TALMUDIC CITY CLERK DEFEATED

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 12:44:00 +0000

A fraudulent city clerk tried to obstruct a petition by thousands of New York City residents to have the crime of 911 properly investigated. When the legal noose was tightened around his neck, his lawyer admitted that his client was in error. Thus paving the way for the next stage in the legal battle against NY CITY's Zionist Jews. Below is the full story as related on the website of NYC CAN:

City of New York Concedes 9/11 Coalition Has 30,000 Valid Signatures To Put Referendum For 9/11 Investigation on November Ballot

New York – In a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors, indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures to put the referendum for a new 9/11 investigation before the voters of New York City this November.
In an earlier letter from the City Clerk dated July 24, 2009, the City had claimed only 26,003 signatures were valid, 3,997 short of the requisite 30,000. The City’s concession that over 30,000 of the 52,000 signatures submitted were in fact valid paves the way for lawyers from both sides to argue the legality of petition.
Asked whether he thought NYC CAN could overcome the City’s challenge to the legality of the petition, legal counsel to the petitioners, Dennis McMahon, said, “Absolutely. Although the City has an incredibly successful record of shooting down ballot initiatives, we will be arguing from a fresh perspective that reflects the unprecedented events of 9/11. We believe the courts will see how critical an issue this is, and be persuaded with our legal reasoning and point of view.” A final determination on the legality of the petition will be reached in time for the referendum to be included on the November ballot should the petitioners prevail.
Representatives for NYC CAN, 9/11 family member Manny Badillo and Executive Director Ted Walter, arrived at the Board of Elections on the morning of Wednesday, September 9, to assist the court-appointed referee in commencing a line-by-line review of the disputed signatures, only to learn the referee’s review had been called off due to a last minute concession by the City. Mr. Badillo immediately got on the phone to inform others of the news.
“The City conceded we have 30,000 valid signatures. Big victory.”
The City’s concession comes as a result of the immense effort put forth by 50+ volunteers who gave more than 1,000 hours over a two week period from August 10 to August 25 to identify a total of 7,166 signatures that were wrongly invalidated by the NYC City Clerk and Board of Elections. On August 27, NYC CAN filed the 631-page Bill of Particulars cataloguing each of the 7,166 signatures it contended were in fact valid. NYC CAN submitted another 28,000 signatures on September 4 to guarantee the referendum will go on the ballot if they win the court case, bringing the total signatures submitted to 80,000.
631-page Bill of Particulars Filed on August 27
NYC CAN must deliver its memorandum of law in response to the City’s motion for summary judgment by Monday, September 21. The City will be given an opportunity to reply before the referee’s decision is made on Monday September 28. Fast-track appeals will likely follow no matter who wins. A final decision will have to be made by September 30.
If the referendum passes in November, it would lead to the creation of a local, independent commission with subpoena power that would be tasked with comprehensively reinvestigating the attacks.
http://www.nyccan.org/

Further Comment by M A Hegazi:

This battle between the Jews of New York City and the rest of the city’s decent citizens is indeed significant and crucial. It is symbolic of a raging large scale battle between the citizens of the United States of America and the Jewish minority that highjacked the country. This evil treacherous minority controls the White House, Congress, the Senate and every government department. It is the same minority that dragged America into barbaric wars and gave America the ugly image it has today.

This battle is indeed crucial and of utmost importance, but you will never hear about it in the Jew-controlled mass media. You might hear about rabbis trading in human organs on the black market, but you will never hear about Jews fighting for the coverup of the 911 Zionist crime.

So, please spread the news and follow the fast developments from here to November 2009. More importantly, please donate to this significant and worthy cause. The legal and other cost are hefty. Personally, I am not optimistic because I know how strong is the grip of those evil Jews over public life wherever they existed. I do know that Jews are never loyal to their countries of birth, citizenship or livelihood. Jews are loyal only to their Jewishness and the state of Israel as a symbol of their unworthy existence. However, I do wish the patriotic group NYC CAN success in their battle against the Jews of New York.

WHO ARE THE REAL TERRORISTS?

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sat, 12 Sep 2009 04:06:00 +0000

Throw this question at the average American simpleton and you would get his spontaneous emphatic reply:

The terrorists are those evil Moslems and Arabs.

Why do you get such erroneous absurd reply?

It is because of the continual bombardment of these simple unsophisticated minds by the evil Jewish mass media. In reality, all those Moslems and Arabs that you see wandering in their funny cumbersome garb are simple people who harbour no evil feelings towards others. They are too busy trying to understand the vague metaphoric nuances of their own benign mysterious religion.When extremist Jews or Christians discuss Islam, they pick on the harsh metaphoric stance Moslems are instructed to take against their enemies, when the latter mount a war against them.

As such, media Jews have depicted Moslems as untrustworthy blood-thirsty people. You would find similar harsh statements in the old and new testaments, if you look hard enough, not to mention the evil Talmud, which is an indictment of its own followers.

But who are the real terrorists?

They are those American, British and European Jews who are running the affairs of the US, UK and most of Europe. They are those power-hungry quasi-human beings who mounted devastating wars on innocent people, after advancing fabricated pretexts for war.

After almost a decade since the MOSSAD-CIA-CHENEY gang planned and executed the tragedy of 911, many simple-minded people in this world do still believe that the cave-dweller Osama Bin Laden was the culprit. It is a shame that only about 70 thousand inhabitants of New York are taking legal action to have 911 properly investigated, while all informed people can find the truth about 911 via a simple push of a computer button. Here is one Internet link of hundreds, if not thousands of links that offer you indelible proof that the US government has been, and still is, involved in a massive coverup of the crime of 911.

Why the coverup?

If the crime of 911 is exposed, so would be the crimes of the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq. It is that simple. This is why Obama would never have the guts to re-examine 911, regardless of the striking facts that require re-investigation.

HOLOHOAXING IN GAZA

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:26:00 +0000

They missed their Holohoax class!

VICTIMS OF ISRAELI GENOCIDE OUTRAGED
Hamas slams UN attempt to teach Jewish pseudo-history

'Holocaust classes' in Gaza!
By NIDAL al-MUGHRABI
Reuters Sunday, 30 August 2009 GAZA, Palestine

Hamas condemned the United Nations Sunday, saying it planned to teach Palestinian children in the Gaza Strip about the Holocaust® — but the UN agency which runs schools in the enclave would not confirm any change.

Branding the [alleged] Nazi genocide of the Jews "a lie invented by the Zionists," the Islamist movement which runs the Gaza Strip wrote in an open letter to a senior UN official that he should withdraw plans for a new history book in UN schools.

A spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA), which educates some 200,000 refugee children in Gaza, said the Holocaust® was not on its current curriculum. He would not comment on Hamas's statement that it was about to change.

'We refuse to let our children study a lie'

Palestinians resent the way world powers reacted to the Holocaust® by supporting the establishment of Israel in 1948, a move that left half the Arab population of then British-ruled Palestine as refugees in Gaza, the West Bank and abroad.

Hamas said it believed UNRWA was about to start using a text for 13-year-olds that included a chapter on the Holocaust®.

In an open letter to local UNRWA chief John Ging, the movement's Popular Committees for Refugees said: "We refuse to let our children study a lie invented by the Zionists."

UNRWA spokesman Adnan Abu Hasna said: "There is no mention of the Holocaust® in the current syllabus." Asked if UNRWA planned to change that, he declined to comment.

Israelis upset

In the Israeli-occupied West Bank, run by the Western-backed Palestinian Authority of President Mahmoud Abbas, teachers said there was no official guidance on teaching about the Holocaust®.

Israelis are angered by denial of the Holocaust® among some in the Middle East, notably lately by leaders in Iran, who provide support for Hamas. Abbas, who has engaged in negotiation with Israel, has had to distance himself from his own 1980s doctoral thesis, which cast doubt on the scale of the Holocaust®.

Hamas's official spokesman in Gaza, Sami Abu Zuhri, said he did not want to discuss the history of the Holocaust® but said: "Regardless of the controversy, we oppose forcing the issue of the so-called Holocaust® onto the syllabus, because it aims to reinforce acceptance of the occupation of Palestinian land."
-------------------------------------------------http://www.reuters.com/article/newsMaps/idUSTRE57T1JW20090830 Continuing the fight for a better world —NEW ORDERDept EPO Box 270486Milwaukee WI 53227

THE TOBEN CASE: WELCOME TO TALMUDISTAN

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 16:07:00 +0000

(Photo by: http://www.adelaideinstitute.org)

I went to Adelaide in order to attend the final kangaroo court hearing that dispatched Dr Fredrick toben to prison. Toben was appealing against the decision by a lower court judge to impose on him a three-month jail term for an alleged “contempt of court” offence. The reason given for the allegation was that on numerous occasions Toben did not believe the allegation that Germans gassed jews in the fourties of the twentieth century. The said judge ordered Toben not to insult jews who believed in the Holocaust myth, and to stop “vilifying” them by believing and asserting that those deluded individuals were “of limited intelligence”, an assertion with which many, including my humble self, would totally agree. People do not need to be of super intelligence in order to be able to see that the so called “Jewish Holocaust” was a total fabrication.

Jews in Germany were among many other groups accused of being “enemies of the state”. They were arrested and sent to concentration camps to be used as forced labour for the German war effort during WW2. There is not a shred of real or logical evidence that any Jew had been deliberately killed. The conditions in the camps might have been bad, the food rations might have been inadequate, but the allegation that Jews were mass-killed is totally absurd. Some workers died because of infectious typhus, a disease transmitted by body lice. The corpses of the dead had to be burnt in order to stop the spread of the epidemic. The claim that six million Jews were executed is a blatant lie propagated by demented individuals who survived the war.

Anyway, I delved into the “Adelaide High Court” where a “full court” of three judges sat on the bench. As the hearing progressed, I could clearly see that the judges had made up their minds before walking into the room. As the formalities continued, David Perkins, the defence counsel, opened for the three judges every possible avenue that would have enabled them to reach a sensible decision. He tried to make them understand that the “Anti Discrimination Act” should not override the constitutional right to free speech, but they shunned him and insisted that the whole matter was an ordinary run-of-the-mill simple case of contempt of court that had nothing to do with the Holocaust.

As the legal theatrics progressed, the outcome became apparent to me. Hiding behind this flimsy façade of “contempt of court”, the presiding judge began to read the justification for the forthcoming sentence. My stomach could not take such nonsense. I stood up in protest and walked out of the courtroom before the sentence was announced. At the door of the courtroom, I turned around to face the judges and gave a respectful bow, which is a custom in court procedures. It shows respect for the law, but not necessarily for the judges who failed it.

As I waited outside the door of the courtroom, I reflected sadly on my last forty years as an Australian citizen. Is this really the free country I loved so dearly? Will it continue to be my refuge from the ugly totalitarian system I left back at my birthplace Egypt?

My colleague, the brave fearless Fredrick Toben, walked out a few minutes after. We exchanged a reassuring look and, together with Peter Hartung and several other supporters, walked for a few metres in the direction of a number of Federal Police agents, who were shyly ready to carry out the instructions they previously received. Fredrick bid us goodbye and walked to them with a friendly smile saying, ”Here I am, I am ready and I have nothing to carry with me.” Minutes later, I met David Perkins who, almost talking to himself, remarked, “They gave us no chance!”

Unlike the programmed robots I have seen on the day, David struck me as a very decent strong believer in and advocate of free speech. He probably believed that the law of the land and its custodians would never transform Australia into a member of the Talmudic group of nations. I believe that, on 13 August 2009, he faced his day of reckoning.

NEW YORK CITY CAN'T

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Mon, 03 Aug 2009 03:52:00 +0000

NYC CAN Plaintiffs Take City to Court
July 31, 2009

9/11 Family Members, and Survivor File for Re-validation of Citizens’ Signatures with New York State Supreme Court, following rejection of NYC CAN petition by the City Clerk and Board of Elections

New York City– On Wednesday, several 9/11 victim family members and a survivor took the first step in challenging the City Clerk’s rejection of the NYC CAN petition for a new investigation in New York City. The group filed a Verified Petition/Order to Show Cause with the Supreme Court of the State of New York requesting a review of Board of Election documentation and a ‘special referee’ appointed to re-validate the over 52,000 signatures filed by NYC CAN on June 24th.

The NYC CAN petition was rejected by the City Clerk on Friday, July 24th, a week ago, certifying less than the minimum of 30,000 qualified signatures of electors. This benchmark, according to the Clerk’s office was not met. A ‘qualified elector’ is a registered New York City voter who was eligible to vote in the last election. According to the letter sent by the Clerk to the City Council, the NY Board of Elections validated 26,003 signatures and invalidated 24,664, leaving 1,333 that were not certified.

At a hearing scheduled for Monday, August 3rd, before a Supreme Court Justice, the plaintiffs, representing tens of thousands of concerned New Yorkers who support a new 9/11 investigation, will formally raise their request for an independent review of the Board of Elections findings. If granted by the presiding Justice, a re-validation of the petition signatures by an independent special referee will follow.

In addition to the requirement to reach the threshold of 30,000 qualified electors, the petition itself must comply with New York Municipal Home Rule Law and relevant Election Laws. The City Clerk maintains the Petition fell short in several areas but it should be emphasized that this is the legal opinion of the Corporation Counsel, the City of New York’s top lawyer, and will be challenged in court by lawyers for the five plaintiffs.

Legal advisors to the plaintiffs believe that the legal objections raised by the Corporation Counsel are specious and should be set aside, however considering the political implications and official opposition to the proposed Commission, obtaining approval for placing the referendum question on the ballot itself will be fraught with difficulty and challenge each step of the way.

The fact is historically in New York City, ballot initiatives have not been successful. The last two were denied by the City Clerk. In both cases the petitioners filed a suit and ultimately lost and thus NYC CAN anticipated the response of the Clerk. And though the odds are stacked against us, we are committed to take the next steps available to us.

Regardless of the outcome, the court case will serve to amplify the demand for a new 9/11 investigation and with lessons learned, should serve to strengthen the ability of the people to petition their government for meaningful referendums in the future.

Please donate to this historic court case now:Go to –

http://nyccan.org/donate.php
------------------------------------------------------
NYC CAN is non-partisan organization comprised of 9/11 Families, First Responders, Survivors and proud, concerned citizens committed to bringing about an independent, impartial investigation into the events of September 11.
------------------------------------------------------

Comment by Mohammed A Hegazi

"New York City Can" might eventually prove that New York City Can't. In a quasi democracy with a two-party system, fanatic Jews reign.

What America needs now is a revolution to destroy the rotten system and build a new one. American democracy is now totally and comprehensively dead. America is in need of “regime change” and “creative anarchy”.

NYCCAN has my moral and financial support, but I know very well who owns and runs America, so did THE WAR CRIMINAL ARIEL SHARON before me, when he said, “We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”

FIGHT THE TALMUDIC CITY CLERK

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 16:36:00 +0000

A CALL TO ACTION – FORWARD WIDELY
　
http://www.nyccan.org/
July 27, 2009

9/11 FAMILIES, FIRST RESPONDERS AND SURVIVORS TO TAKE NEW YORK CITY TO COURT OVER NYC CAN PETITION

SEVENTY THOUSAND New Yorkers signed the NYC CAN petition, raising their voices in support of NYC CAN’s demand for accountability. They have chosen to place the decision to create a new 9/11 investigation – a REAL 9/11 investigation – exactly where it belongs: before the voters of New York City this November.

The voices of SEVENTY THOUSAND Americans who believe in democracy and believe that government exists to serve the people – and not the other way around – have been GAGGED by ONE so-called “PUBLIC SERVANT” – The New York City Clerk – who denied the petition and the voice of the people.

Welcome to America. Democracy denied.

Did you REALLY expect those in halls of power to honor the WILL OF THE PEOPLE? Did you expect this demand for accountability to go uncontested by those who have forgotten the very meaning of the word? Perhaps this obstruction of democracy would go unchallenged in THEIR America. Not in OUR America.

9/11 family members, first responders and survivors expected nothing less than business as usual and ARE NOT HAVING IT. They are preparing to take the City of New York to court to challenge the wrongful denial of our right to decide on the creation of a new 9/11 investigation.

Friends, your determination and generosity have brought us to this crucial moment. TRUTH IS AT THE CROSSROADS, DEMOCRACY UNDER FIRE AND THE DEFINING MOMENT IN THE QUEST FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IS UPON US. This is YOUR movement and nothing may bring you closer to attaining truth than NYC CAN. Stand in the light and demand ANSWERS, not in the shadows of those who would deny you such answers.

THE BIG NEWS: the most experienced election lawyer in New York City stands ready to represent the 9/11 families, first responders and survivors in court in an HISTORIC FIGHT FOR DEMOCRACY AND TRUTH. BUT WE DESPERATELY NEED YOUR FINANCIAL SUPPORT TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. This is your chance – your ONE chance – to stand with the 9/11 families, first responders and survivors, and demand accountability. THIS IS WHAT WE HAVE WORKED FOR, AND WHAT WE CAN ACHIEVE IF WE STAND TOGETHER NOW.

Donate over $25 and we’ll mail you a free NYC CAN button. Donate over $50 and you will receive a free NYC CAN button and a well-made NYC CAN t-shirt.
ACT RIGHT NOW. Go to – http://nyccan.org/donate.php – and donate whatever you can to bring the quest for answers to the biggest stage it has ever had: THE NEW YORK CITY BALLOT.
　
http://www.nyccan.org/
　
　　
"The arc of the moral universe is long, but it bends towards justice.” Theodore Parker

Comment by Mohammed A Hegazi:

You don't have to be a a New Yorker to donate. You don't even have to be American to help the American people restore their lost freedom and democracy. If the people of New York cannot defeat one fanatic Shylock, New York's City Clerk, then America and the world will be defeated by fanatic Jews.

Please help yourself and the world. Purge humanity of the Talmudic curse. DONATE FOR THIS CRUCIAL ENDEAVOUR.

VIOLATING TALMUDIC LAW

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Thu, 30 Jul 2009 13:37:00 +0000

Jewish leader declares son 'dead'

for squealing in New Jersey scandal

By KATE SHEEHY

New York Post

Tuesday, 28 July 2009

A lot of people might like to wring his neck, but the sleazy real-estate mogul who ratted out everyone from politicians to rabbis in a massive corruption case is apparently already as good as dead to his father.

Israel Dwek — the father of Solomon "Shlomo" Dwek, who helped the feds nail three New Jersey mayors and several rabbis in Brooklyn last week — plans to sit shiva for his son because he is so disgusted with his turning on other Jews, reported the Web site PolitickerNJ.com.

Shiva is the traditional Jewish mourning period held after a family member dies.

Cites Talmudic law
The father — citing "the Talmudic Law of Moses that prohibits a Jew from informing on another Jew to a non-Jew" — renounced his son from the pulpit at his synagogue in Deal, NJ, on Saturday, the site said.

Israel Dwek is a revered leader of the Sephardic Jewish community in the wealthy enclave. His son, 36, surfaced as the feds' pointman in a widespread probe that brought down 44 people.

Solomon Dwek turned informant after being busted himself in 2006 for trying to rip off $50 million from PNC Bank in a check-kiting scheme. He helped set up stings for the FBI and IRS initially to help expose international money-laundering by rabbis in Brooklyn and Jersey, authorities said.

'Matchmaker' for human organs
During the course of the investigation, he also led the feds to a Brooklyn rabbi, Levy Izhak Rosenbaum, who allegedly boasted that he had been helping to peddle human organs on the black market for a decade.

On tapes, Rosenbaum allegedly refers to himself as a "matchmaker" who could find an Israeli donor for a "schmear," or money — specifically willing to trade a kidney for $160,000. Others nailed by Solomon Dwek's undercover work include the mayors of Hoboken, Secaucus and Ridgefield, as well as the Jersey City council president.

Hoboken Mayor Peter Cammarano was caught on tape bragging, "I could be indicted and still get 85 to 95 percent of the vote," according to officials. Last night, opponents calling for his resignation rallied at City Hall.

Released on $10-million bond
Dwek has been released on $10-million bond in his own swindle case, which is still pending. Because of his family's prominence in the Jewish community, he was considered the perfect "in" into what is typically a very insular world, officials have said.

Dwek "would meet them in parking lots, in luncheonettes, diners, offices, basement boiler rooms and bathrooms, and the politicians willingly put themselves up for sale," said New Jersey acting US Attorney Ralph Marra.

HOLOHOAX SEASON IN BRITAIN

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:41:00 +0000

British schools to prepare for
intensified Holocaust® indoctrination

300 schools to become Holocaust® specialists
HISTORY: All secondary schools to have Holocaust® expert
£1.5m national program to train teacher from every secondary school in England*

By ADI BLOOM
The TES Friday, 10 July 2009

LONDON — Hundreds of schools across the country are to become specialist centers of Holocaust® education under a national scheme launched today. The plan, which will be rolled out in 300 schools, forms part of the new £1.5-million ($2.4-million) Holocaust® education program run by London University’s Institute of Education.

As The TES revealed in November, the Holocaust Education Development Program will provide extensive specialist training for 3,500 teachers — one from every secondary in England.

The first cohort of 150 will attend a one-day workshop in London at the beginning of November and a second workshop three weeks later. This will be followed by similar sessions in Liverpool. The training will then be introduced across the country over the next two years.

Masters degree in Holo 'education'
From these teachers, 300 will be able to follow up their training with a masters degree module in Holocaust® education. Their schools will then become designated beacons of excellence in the subject.

The masters module, which will be delivered online, will be free to participating teachers. The cost will be covered jointly by the Pears Foundation and the Department for Children, Schools and Families.

Stuart Foster, director of the program, said: “Professional development can be quite short-lived. We want it to be a continuous process rather than people going away and forgetting about it.”

The specialist teachers will co-ordinate Holocaust® education in their schools. Often, the subject is discussed during history, English, RE and citizenship, but with little collaboration between staff. “Are those teachers working together?” Dr. Foster said. “Is there a sense of collaboration in schools? Often, planning is a little bit arbitrary. We want schools to think about how they organize their curriculum.”

New teaching materials
The Holocaust® specialists will also pilot new teaching materials and provide feedback and suggestions for improvement. Eventually, they will work with local authorities, bringing coordinated Holocaust® education into all local schools. They will also liaise with teachers across the country as part of an online network supporting the national training program.

Paul Salmons, the program’s head of curriculum and development, said: “One of the greatest assets of the program will be this pool of teachers with classroom expertise, ideas and knowledge. They will really immerse themselves in cutting-edge research into Holocaust® history and education.”

At present the Holocaust forms a compulsory part of the national curriculum, but teachers often find it a difficult subject to teach effectively. “You’re talking about mass murder — some of the worst atrocities humans are capable of,” Mr. Salmons said. “That can be very disorientating and distressing for young people. We’re looking at how to move them, without traumatizing them.

'Want to encourage deep reflection'
“Teachers want to encourage deep reflection about the Holocaust®, but not revulsion, horror and disgust. The key is to enhance learning, not to shock.”

Judith Vandervelde, an educator at the Jewish Museum in London, agrees that there is an urgent need for effective methods of teaching about the Holocaust® in schools. “The understanding that pupils get through face-to-face interaction with Holocaust® survivors is quite incredible,” she said. “But they’re not going to be here forever. “We have to look into how we’re going to continue to have that connection
without survivors speaking to pupils. We need to look ahead a few years and make Holocaust® education tangible and accessible.”

http://www.tes.co.uk/article.aspx?storycode=6017262

* Under this Judeocentric program the suffering, death and extermination of tens of millions of non-Jews is to be ignored as a mere "detail of history."

THE ULTIMATE HOLOCAUST PROOF*

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 02:58:00 +0000

The dormitories at Auschwitz

WHILE Adelaide's "revisionist historian" Dr Fredrick Toben battles to deny the Holocaust, ANDREW HOLMAN visits Auschwitz-Birkenau and presents the reality:

THE thunder does not rumble over Auschwitz. It roars. Angrily. Like a visitation from the ghosts of history. The air, the ground, the leaves on the trees shake, eerily and in unison. Then it is quiet and still. Until the next violent clap.

A small white fragment reflects from the ground in the fading light. "A bone", says our guide. "The white pieces in the dirt are not stones, they're bits of bones."

You move your feet quickly, trying not to step on the remnants of people's remains. You glance at a small pond and see the reflection of your face. Then your guide says the pond is lined with the ashes of men, women and children who never stood a chance in the Nazi killing machine.

You move again. You notice the dust and ashes on your shoes. You try to shake it off. Everywhere you look, the skeletons of death remain. The thunder roars again but the rain does not come.

The wind blows and you can hear six million voices screaming in your ears, “I never wanted to die, the sun is shining, the flowers are in full bloom casting their bright colours across the blue sky outside the walls of the camp.” You look around you in disbelief. Everything seems so quiet, but you can still hear the faint gasping of all the women and children inside the sixty hundred thousand gas chambers. All of a sudden, you can hear the loud screaming of the guards, “We are running out of gas … we are running out of gas.”

* Please note that the part in black is a cut-and-paste job from an Adelaide newspaper, while the addendum in red is only an improvisation by M A Hegazi, in order to help the writer with his ingenious historic proof that the Holohoax did take place outside the memories and fancies of demented liars.

MUBARAK OF EGYPT COMMITS HIGH TREASON

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:45:00 +0000

Israeli sub enters Suez Canal
DEBKAfile / Special Report Friday, 3 July 2009

TEL AVIV — The Dolphin-class attack submarine is reported to be
the first Israeli naval vessel to transit the Suez Canal in four years on its way from Haifa to Eilat last month.

According to DEBKAfile's military sources, the move indicates a
strengthening of the informal Israel-Egyptian-Saudi pact forged in
recent months against Iran and first revealed by our sources. The three Middle East nations have opted for an Iran policy which is separate from the track pursued by US president Barack Obama.

According to foreign military sources, the Israeli Dolphins are stationed in the Mediterranean, the Arabian Sea and the Indian Ocean opposite Iran's shores. They are said to be armed with torpedo tubes capable of launching nuclear-capable cruise missiles.

OK by Cairo

To transit the Suez Canal, the armed submarine would have required Egyptian permission at the highest level, possibly even President Hosni Mubarak. An official in Cairo told Reuters that its passage would not be problematic as Egypt and Israel are not at war.

This noncommittal response indicates that Egypt has no objection to Israeli military craft passing through the canal on their way to the Red Sea and on to the Persian Gulf in case of a decision to strike Iran. The alternative would be a voyage of weeks around the Horn of Africa.

Our military sources report that since the Israel Navy lost the Dakar submarine near Greece in 1968, all Israeli subs are armed when they move out of harbor. Disclosure of the Israeli sub's passage through the Suez Canal last month is rated by our sources as of high regional significance, over and above the Middle East diplomatic moves afoot.Left: Isaac Rabin; right: The Imbecile-in-Charge of Egypt

====================================
Comment by M A Hegazi

The treachery of the Saudi ruling family has been common knowledge since the US aggression on Iraq and the subsequent occupation. The incompetent Egyptian dictator played a more subtle role, until the time of the Gaza holocaust, when he was stripped of the fig leaf.

Collusion with the Israelis in a possible ill-fated venture against Iran is the ultimate treason. This mad senile dictator deserves a bullet in the head. I am certain that a young Egyptian army zealot would soon finish him off. He crossed all the red lines in his collaboration with Egypt's enemies

I cannot find English adjectives strong enough to describe Hosny Mubarak. Therefore, I can only do him justice in Arabic by calling him "khawal ibn sharmootah".

HAS OBAMA BEEN TRAPPED BY HIS ZIONIST ADVISERS?

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 05:14:00 +0000

The Wall Street Journal joined the rest of the Zionist spin media drumming up US campaign against peaceful Iran. On Sept. 20, 2002, it echoed the voice of doom and had the arch-Zionist Benjamin Netanyaho beat the drum for preventive strike, such that Americans would not wake up to “a mushroom cloud over an American city”.

The sneaky evil Zionist once said during the period of preparation for the assault on Iraq :

“This is a dictator who is … feverishly trying to acquire nuclear weapons.”

"Saddam’s nuclear program has changed. He no longer needs one large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country — and Iraq is a very big country. Even free and unfettered inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites of mass death.”

“ If action is not taken now, we will all be threatened by a much greater peril … no gas mask and no vaccine can protect against nuclear weapons.”

This kind of false diatribe gushed in abundance out of many other Zionist dirty mouths, such as that of Richard Perle and all the Zionists surrounding the clumsy occupant of the White House at the time.

Perle produced a man of the name “Kadir Hamza”, who was claimed to be and introduced as “Saddam’s Bomb Maker”. Hamza said, “After the Osirak reactor was destroyed by Israel in 1981, Saddam began to build uranium enrichment facilities, many facilities, and we built 400 of them, and they’re all over the country. Some of them look like farmhouses, some of them look like classrooms, some of them look like warehouses. You’ll never find them. They don’t turn out much, but every day they turn out a little bit of nuclear materials.” According to this manufactured evidence, Perle warned, “It’s simply a matter of time before he acquires nuclear weapons.”

Gullible Americans swallowed this nonsense and the Zionist war mongers had it their way. America waged an unjustifiable criminal war against a nation that had no intention to do America any harm whatsoever. America occupied Iraq, killed its people and claimed to have achieved the noble ideal of "democracy and freedom" for the people of Iraq!

To commit such war crime in Iraq is unforgivable. However, the Zionist criminals are working hard in order to get America to commit the same crime in Iran. They are repeating the same tactics with no significant improvisation. They know that average Americans not only do have bird brains, but they also have fish memories.

Obama may just have committed himself to take the same stupid course of action against Iran that his half-brained predecessor took against Iraq. He agreed to a December deadline for progress in talks with Iran, in return for an empty promise by Netanyaho to merely sit with the Palestinians, but not to stop usurping the little left of their country. Obama would not dare make a mention of Israel's 200 or so nuclear warheads. After all, Israel is claimed to be the only "ally" of the US in the Mid-East. If the talks with Iran are not fruitful by then, America will escalate its rhetoric and possibly attack Iran. Such unwarranted aggression has been declared by Obama as an open option when he said, “I’ve been very clear that I don’t take any options off the table with respect to Iran.”

Obama has thus given the green light to Israel, and its American surrogates, to provoke collision with Iran within the next six months until December. The Government of Iran are a group of cool-headed bunch of true representatives of their people. They will continue exactly on the same path. Under the shrewd leadership of Ahmadinejad, there will be no room for error or compromise. No foreign country will dictate to Iran. You can sense this resolve in the way they reacted to the UK embassy in Tehran. The embassy covertly acted to foment public unrest in the aftermath of the recent decisively clean elections.

The false claims against Iraq are now being reiterated against Iran. The same provocative actions are underway. Israel continually threatens Iran via cross-border attacks from Kurdistan. Israel has been practising bombing runs to Greece and Gibraltar, which are equidistant to Tehran. Iran is not passively watching. It has improved its long-range missile system, both in quality and, much more importantly, in quantity.

Israel claims Iran is trucking weapons into Gaza via Sudan. The claim is ridiculous. For these weapons to reach destination, they have to pass through Egypt, cross the Red Sea and Sinai, then pass through Israeli and Egyptian checkpoints. Knowing that the inept Egyptian dictator is essentially a Zionist agent, such mission becomes impossible. This is not to detract from the fact that Iran has the right to help the Palestinians in any manner they see fit.

Hillary Clinton is Zionist to the core. She never missed a chance to glorify Jewish stealing of Palestine. However, since she aspired to become vice president, she has tempered her tone a little. She called an Iranian nuclear capability an “extraordinary threat” and said the U.S. goal is “to persuade the Iranian regime that they will actually be less secure if they proceed with their nuclear weapons program.” Her forked tongue does not answer the basic question: What nuclear weapons program?

According to the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007 , American intelligence reports state that Iran halted its weapons program in 2003. There are no reports of the diversion of Iran’s industrial-grade uranium from Natanz or evidence of any secret centrifuge cascade to enrich it to weapons grade. This is reminiscent of Scott Ritter’s reports about Iraq and his repeated declarations that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction.

The final conclusion is that Iran represents no threat to the United States that would justify a war. However, if you are a US president surrounding yourself with a carefully selected bunch of rabid Zionists, any mad decisions are likely to eventuate. Barack Obama should learn that the crowd manipulating him into war with Iran, especially his vice Joe Biden, has the interest of Zionist Israel in mind. Unluckily, such twisted interest is neither the true interest of the United States nor that of humanity at large.

IS AMERICAN DEMOCRACY FOR REAL?

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:55:00 +0000

"New York City voters have the power to legally mandate the formation of a new investigation with subpoena power by petitioning to place a referendum on the ballot in the November 2009 General Election. In September 2008, the petition reached a milestone of 30,000 signatures, the minimum number required to submit the petition to New York City Council for its approval. By June 2009, NYCCAN will eclipse the 45,000 signatures required to bypass City Council, ensuring its placement on the ballot. With the passage of this referendum New York City will take the first giant step towards truth and justice. "

The above extract appears on the site of "NYC Coalition For Accountability Now".

Is this for real?

In other words, will American quasi democracy repair itself?

Are we going to see the likes of Cheney and Bush behind bars?

Will the world know that 911 was an inside job by a gang of Zionists in the administration?

I find it too hard to believe.

November 2009 is not too far away. We will wait and see.

P. S.:

From: Ted Walter, NYCCAN
On Wednesday, June 24, 2009, we filed the petition with 52,000 signatures. 9/11 Family Members Maureen Hunt and Manny Badillo, and First Responders Charlie Giles of the Feal Good Foundation and Bill Gleason of the World Trade Center Rescuers Foundation, arrived at the City Clerk’s office to deliver the petition and speak on behalf of all the proud and concerned citizens who deserve an unbiased, nonpolitical investigation of the tragedy that has affected us so deeply.

Thank you for getting us this far. City Council now has until August 24 to approve the placement of the referendum on the November 3 ballot. As hundreds more family members, first responders and survivors join our campaign and lobby their council members to support the petition, our chances grow. In the unlikely event City Council does not approve the placement of the referendum on the ballot, we will be prepared to deliver an additional 30,000 signatures on August 24 to guarantee it gets on the ballot. Already we have 8,000 of the additional 30,000.

Sincerely,

Ted Walter

IRAN: THE ELECTORAL FRAUD HOAX

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:34:00 +0000

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad: The choice of Iran's masses

“Change for the poor means food and jobs, not a relaxed dress code or mixed recreation... Politics in Iran is a lot more about class war than religion.”
Financial Times Editorial
June 15, 2009

By: James Petras*

Introduction
There is hardly any election, in which the White House has a significant stake, where the electoral defeat of the pro-US candidate is not denounced as illegitimate by the entire political and mass media elite.

In the most recent period, the White House and its camp followers cried foul following the free (and monitored) elections in Venezuela and Gaza, while joyously fabricating an ‘electoral success’ in Lebanon despite the fact that the Hezbollah-led coalition received over 53% of the vote.

The recently concluded, June 12, 2009 elections in Iran are a classic case: The incumbent nationalist-populist President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (MA) received 63.3% of the vote (or 24.5 million votes), while the leading Western-backed liberal opposition candidate Hossein Mousavi (HM) received 34.2% or (3.2 million votes). Iran’s presidential election drew a record turnout of more than 80% of the electorate, including an unprecedented overseas vote of 234,812, in which HM won 111,792 to MA’s 78,300.

The opposition led by HM did not accept their defeat and organized a series of mass demonstrations that turned violent, resulting in the burning and destruction of automobiles, banks, public building and armed confrontations with the police and other authorities. Almost the entire spectrum of Western opinion makers, including all the major electronic and print media, the major liberal, radical, libertarian and conservative web-sites, echoed the opposition’s claim of rampant election fraud. Neo-conservatives, libertarian conservatives and Trotskyites joined the Zionists in hailing the opposition protestors as the advance guard of a democratic revolution. Democrats and Republicans condemned the incumbent regime, refused to recognize the result of the vote and praised the demonstrators’ efforts to overturn the electoral outcome. The New York Times, CNN, Washington Post, the Israeli Foreign Office and the entire leadership of the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations called for harsher sanctions against Iran and announced Obama’s proposed dialogue with Iran as ‘dead in the water’.

The Electoral Fraud Hoax
Western leaders rejected the results because they ‘knew’ that their reformist candidate could not lose…For months they published daily interviews, editorials and reports from the field ‘detailing’ the failures of Ahmadinejad’s administration; they cited the support from clerics, former officials, merchants in the bazaar and above all women and young urbanites fluent in English, to prove that Mousavi was headed for a landslide victory. A victory for Mousavi was described as a victory for the ‘voices of moderation’, at least the White House’s version of that vacuous cliché.

Prominent liberal academics deduced the vote count was fraudulent because the opposition candidate, Mousavi, lost in his own ethnic enclave among the Azeris. Other academics claimed that the ‘youth vote’ – based on their interviews with upper and middle-class university students from the neighborhoods of Northern Tehran were overwhelmingly for the ‘reformist’ candidate.

What is astonishing about the West’s universal condemnation of the electoral outcome as fraudulent is that not a single shred of evidence in either written or observational form has been presented either before or a week after the vote count. During the entire electoral campaign, no credible (or even dubious) charge of voter tampering was raised. As long as the Western media believed their own propaganda of an immanent victory for their candidate, the electoral process was described as highly competitive, with heated public debates and unprecedented levels of public activity and unhindered by public proselytizing.

The belief in a free and open election was so strong that the Western leaders and mass media believed that their favored candidate would win. The Western media relied on its reporters covering the mass demonstrations of opposition supporters, ignoring and downplaying the huge turnout for Ahmadinejad. Worse still, the Western media ignored the class composition of the competing demonstrations – the fact that the incumbent candidate was drawing his support from the far more numerous poor working class, peasant, artisan and public employee sectors while the bulk of the opposition demonstrators was drawn from the upper and middle class students, business and professional class. Moreover, most Western opinion leaders and reporters based in Tehran extrapolated their projections from their observations in the capital – few venture into the provinces, small and medium size cities and villages where Ahmadinejad has his mass base of support. Moreover the opposition’s supporters were an activist minority of students easily mobilized for street activities, while Ahmadinejad’s support drew on the majority of working youth and household women workers who would express their views at the ballot box and had little time or inclination to engage in street politics.

A number of newspaper pundits, including Gideon Rachman of the Financial Times, claim as evidence of electoral fraud the fact that Ahmadinejad won 63% of the vote in an Azeri-speaking province against his opponent, Mousavi, an ethnic Azeri. The simplistic assumption is that ethnic identity or belonging to a linguistic group is the only possible explanation of voting behavior rather than other social or class interests. A closer look at the voting pattern in the East-Azerbaijan region of Iran reveals that Mousavi won only in the city of Shabestar among the upper and the middle classes (and only by a small margin), whereas he was soundly defeated in the larger rural areas, where the re-distributive policies of the Ahmadinejad government had helped the ethnic Azeris write off debt, obtain cheap credits and easy loans for the farmers. Mousavi did win in the West-Azerbaijan region, using his ethnic ties to win over the urban voters. In the highly populated Tehran province, Mousavi beat Ahmadinejad in the urban centers of Tehran and Shemiranat by gaining the vote of the middle and upper class districts, whereas he lost badly in the adjoining working class suburbs, small towns and rural areas.

The careless and distorted emphasis on ‘ethnic voting’ cited by writers from the Financial Times and New York Times to justify calling Ahmadinejad ‘s victory a ‘stolen vote’ is matched by the media’s willful and deliberate refusal to acknowledge a rigorous nationwide public opinion poll conducted by two US experts just three weeks before the vote, which showed Ahmadinejad leading by a more than 2 to 1 margin – even larger than his electoral victory on June 12. This poll revealed that among ethnic Azeris, Ahmadinejad was favored by a 2 to 1 margin over Mousavi, demonstrating how class interests represented by one candidate can overcome the ethnic identity of the other candidate (Washington Post June 15, 2009). The poll also demonstrated how class issues, within age groups, were more influential in shaping political preferences than ‘generational life style’. According to this poll, over two-thirds of Iranian youth were too poor to have access to a computer and the 18-24 year olds “comprised the strongest voting bloc for Ahmadinejad of all groups” (Washington Porst June 15, 2009).

The only group, which consistently favored Mousavi, was the university students and graduates, business owners and the upper middle class. The ‘youth vote’, which the Western media praised as ‘pro-reformist’, was a clear minority of less than 30% but came from a highly privileged, vocal and largely English speaking group with a monopoly on the Western media. Their overwhelming presence in the Western news reports created what has been referred to as the ‘North Tehran Syndrome’, for the comfortable upper class enclave from which many of these students come. While they may be articulate, well dressed and fluent in English, they were soundly out-voted in the secrecy of the ballot box.

In general, Ahmadinejad did very well in the oil and chemical producing provinces. This may have be a reflection of the oil workers’ opposition to the ‘reformist’ program, which included proposals to ‘privatize’ public enterprises. Likewise, the incumbent did very well along the border provinces because of his emphasis on strengthening national security from US and Israeli threats in light of an escalation of US-sponsored cross-border terrorist attacks from Pakistan and Israeli-backed incursions from Iraqi Kurdistan, which have killed scores of Iranian citizens. Sponsorship and massive funding of the groups behind these attacks is an official policy of the US from the Bush Administration, which has not been repudiated by President Obama; in fact it has escalated in the lead-up to the elections.

What Western commentators and their Iranian protégés have ignored is the powerful impact which the devastating US wars and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan had on Iranian public opinion: Ahmadinejad’s strong position on defense matters contrasted with the pro-Western and weak defense posture of many of the campaign propagandists of the opposition. The great majority of voters for the incumbent probably felt that national security interests, the integrity of the country and the social welfare system, with all of its faults and excesses, could be better defended and improved with Ahmadinejad than with upper-class technocrats supported by Western-oriented privileged youth who prize individual life styles over community values and solidarity.

The demography of voting reveals a real class polarization pitting high income, free market oriented, capitalist individualists against working class, low income, community based supporters of a ‘moral economy’ in which usury and profiteering are limited by religious precepts. The open attacks by opposition economists of the government welfare spending, easy credit and heavy subsidies of basic food staples did little to ingratiate them with the majority of Iranians benefiting from those programs. The state was seen as the protector and benefactor of the poor workers against the ‘market’, which represented wealth, power, privilege and corruption.

The Opposition’s attack on the regime’s ‘intransigent’ foreign policy and positions ‘alienating’ the West only resonated with the liberal university students and import-export business groups. To many Iranians, the regime’s military buildup was seen as having prevented a US or Israeli attack. The scale of the opposition’s electoral deficit should tell us is how out of touch it is with its own people’s vital concerns. It should remind them that by moving closer to Western opinion, they removed themselves from the everyday interests of security, housing, jobs and subsidized food prices that make life tolerable for those living below the middle class and outside the privileged gates of Tehran University.

Amhadinejad’s electoral success, seen in historical comparative perspective should not be a surprise. In similar electoral contests between nationalist-populists against pro-Western liberals, the populists have won. Past examples include Peron in Argentina and, most recently, Chavez of Venezuela, Evo Morales in Bolivia and even Lula da Silva in Brazil, all of whom have demonstrated an ability to secure close to or even greater than 60% of the vote in free elections. The voting majorities in these countries prefer social welfare over unrestrained markets, national security over alignments with military empires.

The consequences of the electoral victory of Ahmadinejad are open to debate. The US may conclude that continuing to back a vocal, but badly defeated, minority has few prospects for securing concessions on nuclear enrichment and an abandonment of Iran’s support for Hezbollah and Hamas. A realistic approach would be to open a wide-ranging discussion with Iran, and acknowledging, as Senator Kerry recently pointed out, that enriching uranium is not an existential threat to anyone. This approach would sharply differ from the approach of American Zionists, embedded in the Obama regime, who follow Israel’s lead of pushing for a preemptive war with Iran and use the specious argument that no negotiations are possible with an ‘illegitimate’ government in Tehran which ‘stole an election’.

Recent events suggest that political leaders in Europe, and even some in Washington, do not accept the Zionist-mass media line of ‘stolen elections’. The White House has not suspended its offer of negotiations with the newly re-elected government but has focused rather on the repression of the opposition protesters (and not the vote count). Likewise, the 27 nation European Union expressed ‘serious concern about violence’ and called for the “aspirations of the Iranian people to be achieved through peaceful means and that freedom of expression be respected” (Financial Times June 16, 2009 p.4).

Except for Sarkozy of France, no EU leader has questioned the outcome of the voting. The wild card in the aftermath of the elections is the Israeli response: Netanyahu has signaled to his American Zionist followers that they should use the hoax of ‘electoral fraud’ to exert maximum pressure on the Obama regime to end all plans to meet with the newly re-elected Ahmadinejad regime. Paradoxically, US commentators (left, right and center) who bought into the electoral fraud hoax are inadvertently providing Netanyahu and his American followers with the arguments and fabrications: Where they see religious wars, we see class wars; where they see electoral fraud, we see imperial destabilization.

* James Petras is a frequent contributor to Global Research.

WHAT TURMOIL IN IRAN?

noreply@blogger.com (Mohammed A. Hegazi) — Sun, 21 Jun 2009 00:35:00 +0000

I believe that the alleged turmoil in Iran is just a storm in a teacup. It has been fanned by the Zionist media in the US and Europe. The reality is that the CIA sponsored the losing candidate, who thought he would win and was shocked by the ineptness of his sponsors.

The CIA will never be effective inside Iran. It is very hard to penetrate a country with such strong dedicated national secret service. For decades, the people of Iran had a justifiable innate hatred of the US. There are a few rotten apples among the Iranian population, who fell victim to Zionist propaganda, but they are quickly identified and dealt with.

Iran has an ideal democratic system, with the clergy playing the role of a senate or an upper house. The president does not have as much power as his counterpart in a quasi democracy, such as that of the US or the UK. Iran has poweful institutions that virtually dictate to the president when it comes to matters of defence or foreign policy. There is no room in Iran's politics for the likes of Blair, Bush, or whatshisface who was the premier of Australia at the time of the ill-fated Iraq invasion in 2003.

The article below sheds more light on CIA attempt to destabilise Iran, which is an almost impossible task:

IRAN ELECTION TURMOIL FINANCED BY CIA

TRN Staff
Friday, 19 June 2009

Tehran, Iran (TRN) -- The ongoing turmoil throughout Iran is a result of deliberate destabilization efforts conducted by the US Central Intelligence Agency.

Operating under an operation code named "Restore a Shah" the CIA has been quietly funneling tens of millions of dollars to activists throughout Iran in order to intentionally foment the tumultuous protests being seen in that country since their recent national election.

For more than two years, tens of millions of dollars in U.S. cash has been covertly smuggled into Iran by U.S. troops operating in Iraq. Sources inside the Pentagon have told TRN that much of that cash was recovered from former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. The source went on to say that the funds were never reported to U.S. civilian leaders in order that the CIA could make use of that cash as it deemed appropriate, without congressional oversight.

Iran has long been on the radar screen of U.S. Intelligence agencies after the Iranian Revolution toppled the former Shah of Iran who was useful to the U.S. During that Revolution,

Iranians laid siege to the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, occupying it and holding Embassy staff hostage for 444 days. One of the Iranian students who participated in that Embassy Siege was none other than Iran's current President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

In the photo at right, taken by the CIA outside the U.S. Embassy in Tehran during the Iranian Hostage Crisis, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad can be clearly seen holding onto a blindfolded American citizen who was a hostage from the U.S. Embassy in Tehran.

Those hostages were physically abused, deprived of food and water, prevented form getting medical attention. It was only after Ronald Reagan was elected U.S. President in 1980, that the Iranians realized they had to let the hostages go.

Sources in the Reagan White House made known to reporters at the time that before his inauguration, Reagan passed a message to Iran telling them that unless the American Hostages were freed before he was sworn-in as President, his first official act would be to order carpet bombing of Tehran by U.S. military strikes.

Unlike former President Jimmy Carter who seemed paralyzed and unable to use force to free his own citizens, Reagan suffered no such fear. Minutes prior to Reagan's inauguration, Iran released all the U.S. Hostages, bringing the crisis to an end.

When US Intelligence agencies realized who the Iranian President was, and that he was personally one of the henchmen who held Americans captive in the late 1970's it was decided to undertake any and every effort to destroy his Presidency. But with no formal relations with Iran since the Embassy crisis, it was difficult for US Intelligence operatives to enter Iran and to establish contacts. During the second war with Iraq, many U.S. operatives were able to successfully cross into Iran and bring with them tons of U.S. cash. That began laying the foundations for the present day turmoil in Iran.

The goal of the CIA: Topple the Iranian government and install another government which will be more secular and friendly to the U.S.